Andrea Leadsom
Discussion
Countdown said:
Do they have a bad back or are they lying? If the former then yes, if the latter then they're not "legally" claiming disability benefits.
There are plenty of people pretending they are unable to work, but are legally claiming disbuty benefit. The same as many who are 'legally' avoiding tax. To pretend otherwise is nonsense. Elroy Blue said:
There are plenty of people pretending they are unable to work, but are legally claiming disbuty benefit. The same as many who are 'legally' avoiding tax. To pretend otherwise is nonsense.
If they're lying then I can't see how their claim is "legal". Has Andrea Leadsom lied about anything?Countdown said:
Elroy Blue said:
There are plenty of people pretending they are unable to work, but are legally claiming disbuty benefit. The same as many who are 'legally' avoiding tax. To pretend otherwise is nonsense.
If they're lying then I can't see how their claim is "legal". Has Andrea Leadsom lied about anything?Is there such a thing as a 'tax avoidance scam'? If schemes are deemed scams then they are surely tax evasion scams?
This topic ties in with the other "rich/poor gap topic.
When Laws are framed so loosely or are absent it is only in the nature of some to use this for their own advantage,is that "right" ,well morally no,but legally yes.
Blame the lawmakers,it is their job to provide the legal framework by which we are all equal under the law,not when those with wealth have access to that which is not available to "lesser mortals".
When Laws are framed so loosely or are absent it is only in the nature of some to use this for their own advantage,is that "right" ,well morally no,but legally yes.
Blame the lawmakers,it is their job to provide the legal framework by which we are all equal under the law,not when those with wealth have access to that which is not available to "lesser mortals".
jbudgie said:
Eric Mc said:
jbudgie said:
Eric Mc said:
Never heard of her.
Should I?
Page 5 of the current issue of Private Eye.Should I?
Personally, I think the one with the Camerons on hols is funnier ie 'Nice pair of loafers' and 'Bit harsh'.
http://www.private-eye.co.uk/
But, why buy, when you can view most of it online, like the story about Andrea?
http://www.private-eye.co.uk/sections.php?section_...
Los Endos said:
Slightly different angle.....
Takes a massive pay cut to be an MP, which is a ste job, maybe she just to make a difference ?
Also, she has done a proper job, not like the majority of Politicians from all sides of the House.
It isn't about the money, it's about the influence that it buys and the ability to steer government policy that suits your interests outside of government.Takes a massive pay cut to be an MP, which is a ste job, maybe she just to make a difference ?
Also, she has done a proper job, not like the majority of Politicians from all sides of the House.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff