Cash for sterilisation...

Author
Discussion

dreamz

Original Poster:

5,265 posts

194 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
bbc said:
Drug addicts across the UK are being offered money to be sterilised by an American charity.

Project Prevention is offering to pay £200 to any drug user in London, Glasgow, Bristol, Leicester and parts of Wales who agrees to be operated on.

The first person in the UK to accept the cash is drug addict "John" from Leicester who says he "should never be a father".

The move has been criticised by some drug charities who work with addicts.

Drug treatment charity Addaction estimates one million children in the UK are living with parents who abuse drugs.

Pregnant addicts can pass on dependency to the unborn child, leading to organ and brain damage.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519

devious or not i think its along the right lines. though saying that it is assuming that addicts will never break the cycle.

xr287

874 posts

181 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Good idea if instead of sterilising them they just replace the anesthetic with something suitably lethal.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Usual lefties on the radio banging on about human rights of the addicts but bugger all mentioned about the rights of children being born into abusive situations.

I think I might donate to this charity.

supersingle

3,205 posts

220 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
It's been very successful in the US.

How do I donate?

Mazda Baiter

37,068 posts

189 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Almost a shame it doesn't go a bit further in who it will operate on.

Puggit

48,526 posts

249 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Why should someone have to pay? It should be a condition of receiving benefits...

andy_s

19,421 posts

260 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
My wife suggested they put contraceptives in Methadone, which sounded eminently sensible to me.

Martin Keene

9,485 posts

226 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Mazda Baiter said:
Almost a shame it doesn't go a bit further in who it will operate on.
Indeed. Junkies and alcoholics should only be the top layer. Sadly I'm a firm believer that certain groups of people in this day and age need to be removed from the gene pool...

Mazda Baiter

37,068 posts

189 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
andy_s said:
My wife suggested they put contraceptives in Methadone, which sounded eminently sensible to me.
Or spray-tan.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Scary path to start down.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Scary path to start down.
But our current path of assuming that everyone is capable of bringing up children in a safe and proper enviroment really isn't working

ZOLLAR

19,908 posts

174 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
jmorgan said:
Scary path to start down.
But our current path of assuming that everyone is capable of bringing up children in a safe and proper enviroment really isn't working
You both have made good points there.

oOTomOo

594 posts

192 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
thinfourth2 said:
jmorgan said:
Scary path to start down.
But our current path of assuming that everyone is capable of bringing up children in a safe and proper enviroment really isn't working
You both have made good points there.
Which one is best? - There's only one way to find out...

ZOLLAR

19,908 posts

174 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
oOTomOo said:
ZOLLAR said:
thinfourth2 said:
jmorgan said:
Scary path to start down.
But our current path of assuming that everyone is capable of bringing up children in a safe and proper enviroment really isn't working
You both have made good points there.
Which one is best? - There's only one way to find out...
Indeed, hopefully we'll choose the right one.

fido

16,850 posts

256 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Can they extend this to non-drug users as well .. perhaps a one-off benefits payment, or a lifetime subscription to Sky?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Can they extend this to non-drug users as well .. a lifetime subscription to Sky?
Thats harsh not everyone that subscribes to Sky needs sterilised

Just most of them

ZOLLAR

19,908 posts

174 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Can they extend this to non-drug users as well .. perhaps a one-off benefits payment, or a lifetime subscription to Sky?
I'll do it for lifetime sub to sky...... I've already had 2 children and don't want more hehe

sjg

7,464 posts

266 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Usual lefties on the radio banging on about human rights of the addicts but bugger all mentioned about the rights of children being born into abusive situations.

I think I might donate to this charity.
Yes, let's eliminate the risk of bad parenting and grow children in jars instead.

supersingle

3,205 posts

220 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
sjg said:
Yes, let's eliminate the risk of bad parenting and grow children in jars instead.
I often wonder if people who quote Huxley have actually read Brave New World. The book is ambiguous about enlightenment and authoritarianism. The savage gets caught between two worlds and despairs at both. Try reading it again.

Anyway, drug addicts volunteering for sterilisation is GREAT news.

Cookie172

856 posts

212 months

Monday 18th October 2010
quotequote all
Could extend this to anyone that appears on Jeremy Kyle's show too