Chaytor sent down
Discussion
Yes but ..
What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
Why is Udin not checking into Holloway round about now along with Barbara Follett, Margaret Moran and the appalling Jacqui Smith?
What about Duck House Man?
Can't help thinking this fakir has been made a sacrificial lamb.
The system stinks.
What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
Why is Udin not checking into Holloway round about now along with Barbara Follett, Margaret Moran and the appalling Jacqui Smith?
What about Duck House Man?
Can't help thinking this fakir has been made a sacrificial lamb.
The system stinks.
audidoody said:
Yes but ..
What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
Why is Udin not checking into Holloway round about now along with Barbara Follett, Margaret Moran and the appalling Jacqui Smith?
What about Duck House Man?
Can't help thinking this fakir has been made a sacrificial lamb.
The system stinks.
Yeah, but one is a start.What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
Why is Udin not checking into Holloway round about now along with Barbara Follett, Margaret Moran and the appalling Jacqui Smith?
What about Duck House Man?
Can't help thinking this fakir has been made a sacrificial lamb.
The system stinks.
off_again said:
18 months and he pleaded guilty - get in.... I was expecting some 6 months, suspended for 12 months or something equally as daft. Get in....!
Made my rather dull and miserable day.
To be honest I was expecting a suspended.Made my rather dull and miserable day.
So was he probably.
He'll have a ringpiece like an onion ring when he gets out.
voicey said:
18 months is a result given the relatively low sum involved, the early guilty plea and his previous good character. No doubt he'll be appealing the sentence but at the very least he'll do a few days in the clink.
EFS
I bet the ones who are pleading not guilty are bricking it nowEFS
Edited by voicey on Friday 7th January 14:57
Soovy said:
voicey said:
18 months is a result given the relatively low sum involved, the early guilty plea and his previous good character. No doubt he'll be appealing the sentence but at the very least he'll do a few days in the clink.
EFS
I bet the ones who are pleading not guilty are bricking it nowEFS
Edited by voicey on Friday 7th January 14:57
Soovy said:
I bet the ones who are pleading not guilty are bricking it now
I was just saying the same thing in the office. What is it these days for an early guilty plea? 50%?!The best thing is that he'll be sent immediately to a remand prison before being categorised which are typically a category B. Take it from someone who knows - they're not a nice place to spend time. 23 hours a day lock up sharing a tiny cell.
The other funny thing is that he'll be categorised D and would have been sent to Ford.... if it hadn't been burnt down over new year....
Edited by voicey on Friday 7th January 15:05
audidoody said:
What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
What about Bliar, he who 'accidentally' shredded his expenses, expenses that it seems there were no other copies or records of?We all know that if a MOP did the same with an important financial document that it would be assumed by the powers that be that we were guilty of something.
Also any of them that are found guilty for cheating/lying/fiddling should have the 'proceeds of the crime' ie any and all earnings related to their employment confiscated and in Bliar's case (or Brown's if applicable) used to help repay the defecit...
catso said:
audidoody said:
What about ALL THE OTHER troughers from Brown down?
What about Bliar, he who 'accidentally' shredded his expenses, expenses that it seems there were no other copies or records of?We all know that if a MOP did the same with an important financial document that it would be assumed by the powers that be that we were guilty of something.
Also any of them that are found guilty for cheating/lying/fiddling should have the 'proceeds of the crime' ie any and all earnings related to their employment confiscated and in Bliar's case (or Brown's if applicable) used to help repay the defecit...
I know that we'd be fked over if we 'shredded' our receipts
voicey said:
18 months is a result given the relatively low sum involved, the early guilty plea and his previous good character. No doubt he'll be appealing the sentence but at the very least he'll do a few days in the clink.
EFS
All the anti-Labour crap here, plenty of Tories were at it too.EFS
I bet Lord Hanningfield – the Tory peer accused of theft by false accounting – on the question of privilege did not pursue a supreme court challenge like the 3 Labour dicks, might be colouring his pants now.
Chaytor gets 18 months for fiddling a few thousand quid. Hanningfield - do I remember he claimed 100grand for ONE overnight stay? (can that be right? can he be that stupid?).
Anyway, still stinks. All those who fiddled (sorry, claimed ), and that includes Cameron, Broon and Cleggie carry on regardless.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff