Foster Children removed from couple for UKIP membership
Discussion
purplepolarbear said:
No, but UKIP would, I presume, send its members a newsletter. The kids may for example pick up the post and see this and realise the parents subscribe to it. I don't think it would be possible for the parents to hide this completely.
Right, so are you in support of removing children from their parents if the parents vote for the BNP? After all, these parents might receive BNP literature in the post and this might cause these children to become racist.XCP said:
Perhaps UKIP should make their policy clearer if people can get it that wrong. The removal of any possible doubt would seem to be a good thing.
Oh and does anyone else find Farages membership of the European Parliament a bit odd?
The problem comes down to the last few local electionsOh and does anyone else find Farages membership of the European Parliament a bit odd?
Where lots of Labour accusations of them being Racist, mainly due to them being really the opposition in almost all seats.
BOR said:
The social workers are "damned if they do, damned if they don't"
They are responsible for the safety of the kids they place, and, with the best will in the world, a lot of UKIP members have a tendency to the sendemback.
The majority might not be racist, but they sure don't like The Foreign.
Is it worth the risk ?
They are responsible for the safety of the kids they place, and, with the best will in the world, a lot of UKIP members have a tendency to the sendemback.
The majority might not be racist, but they sure don't like The Foreign.
Is it worth the risk ?
...or works for Rotherham Council.
odyssey2200 said:
Why is UKIPs policy so unacceptable?
Because in modern Britain, if you even question immigration or the colour of people involved in gang warfare you are immediately branded a racist. That way the problem can be brushed under the carpet rather than addressed.Would not surprise me if someone fires a paedo round at UKIP next in order to discredit them now the racist accusation has flopped.
Mr_B said:
Once again the UK wets itself that it might be seen to be racist, panics and rushes in with a dumb decision to prove its not.
I think Rotherham has much more pressing issues of actual failed child care with racial overtones that have been buried to worry about
Indeed, utterly spot on.I think Rotherham has much more pressing issues of actual failed child care with racial overtones that have been buried to worry about
Apologies for quoting myself from the "Rape Gang thread" but I just want to show how seriously the situation in Rotherham stinks.
FiF said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
FiF said:
Look, some of these officials have a lot to answer for. Rotherham council offered one girl who had been abused from the age of 12, lessons in Urdu and Punjabi to help her "understand."
A 13 year old girl was found drunk in a derelict house at 3am with a large group of adult males who had given her vodka. The girl was arrested for a public order offence, the men walked.
Speechless. Something stinks here.
if that's true it really is breathtakingA 13 year old girl was found drunk in a derelict house at 3am with a large group of adult males who had given her vodka. The girl was arrested for a public order offence, the men walked.
Speechless. Something stinks here.
who are the 'officials'? social services or police?
Laura Wilson was murdered for exposing the men who were abusing her and so she had brought shame on their families. Council officials had known for 6 years that she was at risk.
A 2010 report from the Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board said the crimes had ‘cultural characteristics ... which are locally sensitive in terms of diversity’, but warned of ‘sensitivities of ethnicity with potential to endanger the harmony of community relationships’.
I'm ashamed that we, as a society, have allowed this to happen. To be honest I think that if society taken in the widest context had known this was going on then things would have been acted upon.
I heard this on the radio this morning. I am lost for words. Is this what happens in our country now? Or have I been teleported 50 years back in time and moved to East Germany? or some other fascist police state? Do the child snatchers in question walk with a limp and wear long black leather coats?
Disgusting.. 100% no other way to describe this. I prey these child snatchers come to a painful end.. Something similar to a mash up of a final destination/human centipede movie will do nicely.
Disgusting.. 100% no other way to describe this. I prey these child snatchers come to a painful end.. Something similar to a mash up of a final destination/human centipede movie will do nicely.
Grenoble said:
Not really, it's a perfect model of democracy that someone who is "anti" - and wants to fundamentally change an institution can stand on that platform and be elected.
I'd find it stranger if he stood on a pro-Europe platform and then tried to challenge and change it.
He is an MEP, who, if he had his way, would not be elected. That is odd to me.I'd find it stranger if he stood on a pro-Europe platform and then tried to challenge and change it.
odyssey2200 said:
purplepolarbear said:
Oakey said:
purplepolarbear said:
I'm sure they wouldn't do so deliberately, but it would be difficult to hide it from the kids and the kids would have some understanding, maybe misinformed, that UKIP isn't a good thing for people from their country in the UK. Hence they wouldn't trust the foster parents and feel loved by them.
Do you have material from whatever political party you support littered all over your house?What about a Tory one?
Why is UKIPs policy so unacceptable?
However, here, the main thing is the kids grow up in an environment where they feel loved and secure.
The party is not racist, but there is a perception that it is supported by people hostile to foreigners, especially Eastern Europeans. The kids might think the parents don't like people from their country if they know they are members of the party. They may therefore think, wrongly, the parents don't like them.
XCP said:
He is an MEP, who, if he had his way, would not be elected. That is odd to me.
What is odd about that. In order for a party to exert influence, it must elect its members to the parliaments where decisions are made. Or would yopu rather he just tried the revolutionary method of political change?Borghetto said:
What is odd about that. In order for a party to exert influence, it must elect its members to the parliaments where decisions are made. Or would yopu rather he just tried the revolutionary method of political change?
Decisions about our membership of the EU are made in Westminster. I would have thought it better to start there.XCP said:
Borghetto said:
What is odd about that. In order for a party to exert influence, it must elect its members to the parliaments where decisions are made. Or would yopu rather he just tried the revolutionary method of political change?
Decisions about our membership of the EU are made in Westminster. I would have thought it better to start there.XCP said:
Borghetto said:
What is odd about that. In order for a party to exert influence, it must elect its members to the parliaments where decisions are made. Or would yopu rather he just tried the revolutionary method of political change?
Decisions about our membership of the EU are made in Westminster. I would have thought it better to start there.The change in politics in Westminster is not something that happens quickly.
By having a platform as MEPs works well for them to build a party.
BOR said:
MX7 said:
There is an explanation as to what's happened there. Joyce Thacker even says that she believes that UKIP has a policy of "ending multiculturalism". It doesn't, and she's a f
king moron.
king moron.UKIP-Manifesto said:
End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies.
Seems like it does to me.MX7 said:
BOR said:
MX7 said:
There is an explanation as to what's happened there. Joyce Thacker even says that she believes that UKIP has a policy of "ending multiculturalism". It doesn't, and she's a fking moron.
king moron.UKIP-Manifesto said:
End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies.
Seems like it does to me.The discredited, unfettered immigration without integration is still, apparently, strong with Labour diehards.
MX7 said:
What makes you believe that UKIP wants to end multiculturalism?
There might be a clue in the policies set out on their website,http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/1499-imm...
"End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies".
Ozzie Osmond said:
MX7 said:
What makes you believe that UKIP wants to end multiculturalism?
There might be a clue in the policies set out on their website,http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/1499-imm...
"End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies".
Bearing in mind most people I know in UKIP couldn't be more multicultural.
Going by this stupid ruling the Minigland bros should have been removed from circulation as their parents are/were rampant commies. But the daft lefties wouldn't accept that......
Britain is no longer a democracy, it's ruled by daft lefties and greenslime. Time for a revolution methinks!!!
Britain is no longer a democracy, it's ruled by daft lefties and greenslime. Time for a revolution methinks!!!
JMGS4 said:
Going by this stupid ruling the Minigland bros should have been removed from circulation as their parents are/were rampant commies. But the daft lefties wouldn't accept that......
Britain is no longer a democracy, it's ruled by daft lefties and greenslime. Time for a revolution methinks!!!
Britain is no longer a democracy, it's ruled by daft lefties and greenslime. Time for a revolution methinks!!!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff