The truth about immigration

Author
Discussion

Sgt Bilko

1,929 posts

217 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Attempt to arrive in the UK without a visa and the following are likely to happen:

1. Airline refuse to allow you to board as they face a fine for bringing you to the UK (carriers liability, due to go up to £7,000 per PAX)
2. You will be stopped at control
3. You will be interviewed at length
4. The granting of Leave to Enter is discretionary and only authorised at a management level and only then for discretionary purposes, such as a seriously ill relative/funeral - and these will be checked before admittance is granted
5. Likely that the passport will be held onto if leave to enter is refused, but temporary admission granted (few days pending confirmation of checks) and if they fail to return or the checks don't pan out, the file will be passed to the enforcement teams and they will spool up an early morning visit to check the strength of the door.

4v6

1,098 posts

128 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
Foppo said:
Racism can be very subtle,you don't have to shout it from the rooftop.
+1 Racism/xenophobia within the Tories and especially lunatic Kippers is thinly veiled and their narrow minded supporters lap it up. If as a country/separate countries (hopefully) we do not massively encourage large scale immigration over the next 50 years......we are ALL fked..... http://niesr.ac.uk/press/can-ageing-scotland-affor...
Wow you really hate the british dont you?

Youre one of them prima nocta types, breeding out the undesirables, how very uncle adolf.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

219 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
Wow you really hate the british dont you?
What is it to be British, if not to find a few short branches down the family tree an immigrant landed from foreign shores? You might argue our (and our allies in the US) fighting spirit and ability to punch above our weight comes from our collective positions in history as being those who faught for or against and left where we originally came from.

Being British is not about which plot of land you landed on when you fell out of your mother.

4v6

1,098 posts

128 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
4v6 said:
Wow you really hate the british dont you?
What is it to be British, if not to find a few short branches down the family tree an immigrant landed from foreign shores? You might argue our (and our allies in the US) fighting spirit and ability to punch above our weight comes from our collective positions in history as being those who faught for or against and left where we originally came from.

Being British is not about which plot of land you landed on when you fell out of your mother.
Whys it being argued that far from needing less immigration we need more..... needing them for what I ask?
To dilute british identity like a homeopathic remedy perhaps?



10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

219 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
To dilute british identity like a homeopathic remedy perhaps?
What do you define as 'British Identity'?

Do you understand the history of this country?

I totally agree with any analysis that worries over the available space and resources in this country to deal with a large influx of people without a corresponding outgoing. However to claim that an influx is bad on the grounds that the people coming in aren't British seems a bit glib.

HonestIago

1,719 posts

188 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
What is it to be British, if not to find a few short branches down the family tree an immigrant landed from foreign shores? You might argue our (and our allies in the US) fighting spirit and ability to punch above our weight comes from our collective positions in history as being those who faught for or against and left where we originally came from.

Being British is not about which plot of land you landed on when you fell out of your mother.
What a load of twaddle. Our fighting spirit (us not the US) came from an intense loyalty to our great little island nation which gave a sense of belonging to something great. We used to lead the world you know, despite the fact leftist apologists would rather British achievements were expunged from history. Filling our country with the dross of the third world who ACTIVELY DESPISE our culture and heritage (they follow the religion of peace!) is the ruination of our nation...they are NOT British!

vonuber

17,868 posts

167 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
If you met me in the street you would think I was as British as they come. And yet none of my family were here 60 years ago. So what does that mean for Britishness?

IrateNinja

767 posts

180 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
It really grates me about this politicians vanity project ('free movement of people and labour' is a nice tag line) is when I go back to my home town and speak to people I know who used to be in the building trade. These guys' families have been hit so hard by their being priced out of the market. These families are great people but because of the changes to the local economy, racism and xenophobia is gaining a foothold in what would otherwise be a healthy liberal environment. And you can't blame any Polish father or Romanian mother coming to the UK, because if they know they'll get 4 times the wage to raise their children than they would in their home state why wouldn't they give it a shot in Britain?

HonestIago

1,719 posts

188 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
vonuber said:
If you met me in the street you would think I was as British as they come. And yet none of my family were here 60 years ago. So what does that mean for Britishness?
You are British! It's no slight on the idea of "Britishness". Its not JUST about where your origins lie it is about your attitude to the country that provides you with a home and how much you see yourself as "one of us".

Demanding a ban on alcohol or women in short skirts whilst pushing for Sharia Law is not a British thing to do, do you see the difference?

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Mrr T said:
The worst I have driven in is actually Bucharest.
Bucharest.....worse than London? It must have got hellishly worse in the last 5 years. I used to think it was a nice drive from there to Braila on the banks of the Danube compared to driving in London.

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
HonestIago said:
Of course it is a known fact that immigrants do not age... You are completely warped..you WANT MORE mass immigration? You want the country of our grandparents to be COMPLETELY unrecognisable?

What is it that drives your hatred of your nation and yourself such that you view a desire not to be swamped by the third world as xenophobia? You must really hate the likes of Australia and Canada...

Of course we have problems with our aging population but mass immigration is NOT the answer and most sane people agree. I am a Scot but feel more of a Brit simply because I detest the socialist politics of Scotland. I would HATE for Scotland to suffer the sort of mass uncontrolled immigration that folks down south have had forced upon them. Yet this is exactly what Salmond will do if we vote Yes, yet many do not realise this. You, however, seem to welcome it... confused
Most immigrants prefer to go home after a few years....we tend to get a cycle of fresh blood all the time. You are missing the point it doesn't have to be done over night....see link for figures on annual requirements for next 50 years.

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
pcvdriver said:
Foppo said:
Racism can be very subtle,you don't have to shout it from the rooftop.
+1 Racism/xenophobia within the Tories and especially lunatic Kippers is thinly veiled and their narrow minded supporters lap it up. If as a country/separate countries (hopefully) we do not massively encourage large scale immigration over the next 50 years......we are ALL fked..... http://niesr.ac.uk/press/can-ageing-scotland-affor...
Wow you really hate the british dont you?

Youre one of them prima nocta types, breeding out the undesirables, how very uncle adolf.
You have spectacularly failed to grasp the point. We have not bred fast enough to keep abreast of supporting our aging population. I do not in any way, shape or form support a policy of prima nocta. Merely to allow for unfettered immigration. I do not hate the British, merely had enough of the aholes in Westminster.

HonestIago

1,719 posts

188 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
HonestIago said:
Of course it is a known fact that immigrants do not age... You are completely warped..you WANT MORE mass immigration? You want the country of our grandparents to be COMPLETELY unrecognisable?

What is it that drives your hatred of your nation and yourself such that you view a desire not to be swamped by the third world as xenophobia? You must really hate the likes of Australia and Canada...

Of course we have problems with our aging population but mass immigration is NOT the answer and most sane people agree. I am a Scot but feel more of a Brit simply because I detest the socialist politics of Scotland. I would HATE for Scotland to suffer the sort of mass uncontrolled immigration that folks down south have had forced upon them. Yet this is exactly what Salmond will do if we vote Yes, yet many do not realise this. You, however, seem to welcome it... confused
Most immigrants prefer to go home after a few years....we tend to get a cycle of fresh blood all the time. You are missing the point it doesn't have to be done over night....see link for figures on annual requirements for next 50 years.
Yes I am sure all the Pakistanis and Somalis can't wait to return to the hellhole they came from when they have free healthcare and access to the welfare state here. It is NOT just EU migrants that we have to concern ourselves with (unlike what the BBC seem to think)!

einsign

5,497 posts

248 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
annual requirements for next 50 years.
Annual requirements to do what exactly?

Mrr T

12,394 posts

267 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
Bucharest.....worse than London? It must have got hellishly worse in the last 5 years. I used to think it was a nice drive from there to Braila on the banks of the Danube compared to driving in London.
I have been there on a regular basis for last 7 years. It has got steadily worst. Its now a nightmare at rush hour. Some bits of the beltway have been improved but still some major problems where it reverts to 2 lanes only. Once you get outside the beltway then the traffic is of cause less but that true in the UK. I would say since they have opens the Motorway from Bucharest to Constanta that journey has gone from nightmare to easy.

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
HonestIago said:
Of course it is a known fact that immigrants do not age... You are completely warped..you WANT MORE mass immigration? You want the country of our grandparents to be COMPLETELY unrecognisable?

What is it that drives your hatred of your nation and yourself such that you view a desire not to be swamped by the third world as xenophobia? You must really hate the likes of Australia and Canada...

Of course we have problems with our aging population but mass immigration is NOT the answer and most sane people agree. I am a Scot but feel more of a Brit simply because I detest the socialist politics of Scotland. I would HATE for Scotland to suffer the sort of mass uncontrolled immigration that folks down south have had forced upon them. Yet this is exactly what Salmond will do if we vote Yes, yet many do not realise this. You, however, seem to welcome it... confused
How do you think America got from being a wilderness on the outskirts of civilisation to a world superpower in under 100 years? The answer is massive amounts of unrestricted immigration.
There was a time in the 1940's, when right wing policies were necessary - desirable even. But these times are gone. Any forward thinking person has to put aside any petty prejudices they may personally feel for the better of the country as a whole. Don't like people of a different skin colour/different accent to you? fking tough - we as a country need them to help support us, our children and grandchildren in years to come.

HonestIago

1,719 posts

188 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
HonestIago said:
Of course it is a known fact that immigrants do not age... You are completely warped..you WANT MORE mass immigration? You want the country of our grandparents to be COMPLETELY unrecognisable?

What is it that drives your hatred of your nation and yourself such that you view a desire not to be swamped by the third world as xenophobia? You must really hate the likes of Australia and Canada...

Of course we have problems with our aging population but mass immigration is NOT the answer and most sane people agree. I am a Scot but feel more of a Brit simply because I detest the socialist politics of Scotland. I would HATE for Scotland to suffer the sort of mass uncontrolled immigration that folks down south have had forced upon them. Yet this is exactly what Salmond will do if we vote Yes, yet many do not realise this. You, however, seem to welcome it... confused
How do you think America got from being a wilderness on the outskirts of civilisation to a world superpower in under 100 years? The answer is massive amounts of unrestricted immigration.
There was a time in the 1940's, when right wing policies were necessary - desirable even. But these times are gone. Any forward thinking person has to put aside any petty prejudices they may personally feel for the better of the country as a whole. Don't like people of a different skin colour/different accent to you? fking tough - we as a country need them to help support us, our children and grandchildren in years to come.
Genuine question: Do you think America would have achieved as much were its "massive amounts of unrestricted immigration" all third world followers of the religion of peace?

It was WHO come to America (largely white Christian Europeans)that made it what it is...not the mere fact it had immigration...see the difference?

I have no problem with anyone of any skin colour...so long as they are good citizens and benefit the country. A LARGE proportion of our immigrants do NOT benefit the country. However, I do NOT blame immigrants themselves, I blame our corrupt politicians who have set out to completely change the fabric of society WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
Whys it being argued that far from needing less immigration we need more..... needing them for what I ask?
To dilute british identity like a homeopathic remedy perhaps?
I used to think you had some intellingence....but with that last remark- any credibility went out of the window. We in Britain over the last 2000 or so years have a populace made up from inhabitants from all over Europe, from the Romans onwards. Or do yoou think we are an Aryan super race once favoured by a certain Austrian chap?

HonestIago

1,719 posts

188 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
pcvdriver said:
4v6 said:
Whys it being argued that far from needing less immigration we need more..... needing them for what I ask?
To dilute british identity like a homeopathic remedy perhaps?
I used to think you had some intellingence....but with that last remark- any credibility went out of the window. We in Britain over the last 2000 or so years have a populace made up from inhabitants from all over Europe, from the Romans onwards. Or do yoou think we are an Aryan super race once favoured by a certain Austrian chap?
So are you saying that no country can have an identity if it has had an immigrant at any point in recorded history? You are totally off your rocker as well as having a hatred of Britain.

pcvdriver

1,819 posts

201 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
HonestIago said:
Genuine question: Do you think America would have achieved as much were its "massive amounts of unrestricted immigration" all third world followers of the religion of peace?

It was WHO come to America (largely white Christian Europeans)that made it what it is...not the mere fact it had immigration...see the difference?

I have no problem with anyone of any skin colour...so long as they are good citizens and benefit the country. A LARGE proportion of our immigrants do NOT benefit the country. However, I do NOT blame immigrants themselves, I blame our corrupt politicians who have set out to completely change the fabric of society WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!
Without the amount of immigration they've had they would still be a backwater wilderness. Without a populace you do not have a base for taxation/financial growth, because there would be noone to buy stuff or pay tax.Fankly it matters not one jot what their skin colour is. To suggest otherwise is simply repugnant.