UK Honeymoon Couple Attacked in S.A.

[anonymous-user]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Yes

[Colonial]

stitched said:

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Bing o said:

Jimbeaux said:

Bing o said:

TonyToniTone said:

Jimbeaux said:

Used to be such a nice place I hear.

Jimbeaux said:

IIRC, it certainly was far from a sthole then; what changed?.....oh, yea.

People like you lost power that's what happened.

Jim just misses people calling him "Masser" of a morning.

I think it's all our fault for not keeping the darkies in their place, what ho!

Big assumption on your part. Even ironic seeing as my wife is a racial minority.

Does she wear a white pinny and call you masser Jim?

Only if he asks nicely

Not even then. I find it telling, that you al like to label me neatly as a racist and then, upon finding my wife is a minority, resort to calling her some sort of subserveant. I would die for that woman without a minutes hesitation. ETA: If I am ever at a BT&P event, see to it that I don't see you two. If you think that's a bluff, then all the better for me.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 02:22

WTF, I might have banged heads a couple of times with Jim ( because he's an ignorant yank) but I never would have sunk to attacking his family.
Keep it clean peeps.
ETA: Never comment when halfway through a thread, though the sentiment remains the same.

Edited by stitched on Wednesday 17th November 20:41

Come on, it’s been dealt with. And if someone brings up something like that, in the context of a thread, then it’s fair game to make a joke about it in the same thread. Well, that’s my position on the matter anyway.

You don't want something talked about, don't bring it up online.

[Ayahuasca]

Mirpuris?

Reminds me of the old Spanish joke (not sure if it translates) - A tourist in Africa overheard two foreign hunters bragging about the game they had shot. One said - I shot two elephants, a lion, a giraffe and twenty minoplies.

The other - Well I shot three elephants, a gorilla, two leopards and twenty-eight minoplies.

Tourist says - I hope you don't mind, but I overheard your conversation. I know what elephants and leopards, etc are, but what the hell is a minoply?

The hunters look at him and one of them says - We aren't too sure to be honest, but they are small dark things and when you point the rifle at them they run very fast and cry out 'mi no plees'!




important legal caveat - this is a rubbish joke not a racist joke because it is at the expense of the ignorant foreign hunters, not at the so-called 'minoply' who is indeed the innocent victim of the scenario and who may or may not be a member of a racial minority, as may the hunter for that matter, so no getting of undergarments into a froth alright. Thank you.

[stitched]

Colonial said:

stitched said:

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Bing o said:

Jimbeaux said:

Bing o said:

TonyToniTone said:

Jimbeaux said:

Used to be such a nice place I hear.

Jimbeaux said:

IIRC, it certainly was far from a sthole then; what changed?.....oh, yea.

People like you lost power that's what happened.

Jim just misses people calling him "Masser" of a morning.

I think it's all our fault for not keeping the darkies in their place, what ho!

Big assumption on your part. Even ironic seeing as my wife is a racial minority.

Does she wear a white pinny and call you masser Jim?

Only if he asks nicely

Not even then. I find it telling, that you al like to label me neatly as a racist and then, upon finding my wife is a minority, resort to calling her some sort of subserveant. I would die for that woman without a minutes hesitation. ETA: If I am ever at a BT&P event, see to it that I don't see you two. If you think that's a bluff, then all the better for me.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 02:22

WTF, I might have banged heads a couple of times with Jim ( because he's an ignorant yank) but I never would have sunk to attacking his family.
Keep it clean peeps.
ETA: Never comment when halfway through a thread, though the sentiment remains the same.

Edited by stitched on Wednesday 17th November 20:41

Come on, it’s been dealt with. And if someone brings up something like that, in the context of a thread, then it’s fair game to make a joke about it in the same thread. Well, that’s my position on the matter anyway.

You don't want something talked about, don't bring it up online.

I realised that as I went through, just caught me halfway as OTT.
Hence the edit.

[Colonial]

stitched said:

Colonial said:

stitched said:

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Bing o said:

Jimbeaux said:

Bing o said:

TonyToniTone said:

Jimbeaux said:

Used to be such a nice place I hear.

Jimbeaux said:

IIRC, it certainly was far from a sthole then; what changed?.....oh, yea.

People like you lost power that's what happened.

Jim just misses people calling him "Masser" of a morning.

I think it's all our fault for not keeping the darkies in their place, what ho!

Big assumption on your part. Even ironic seeing as my wife is a racial minority.

Does she wear a white pinny and call you masser Jim?

Only if he asks nicely

Not even then. I find it telling, that you al like to label me neatly as a racist and then, upon finding my wife is a minority, resort to calling her some sort of subserveant. I would die for that woman without a minutes hesitation. ETA: If I am ever at a BT&P event, see to it that I don't see you two. If you think that's a bluff, then all the better for me.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 02:22

WTF, I might have banged heads a couple of times with Jim ( because he's an ignorant yank) but I never would have sunk to attacking his family.
Keep it clean peeps.
ETA: Never comment when halfway through a thread, though the sentiment remains the same.

Edited by stitched on Wednesday 17th November 20:41

Come on, it’s been dealt with. And if someone brings up something like that, in the context of a thread, then it’s fair game to make a joke about it in the same thread. Well, that’s my position on the matter anyway.

You don't want something talked about, don't bring it up online.

I realised that as I went through, just caught me halfway as OTT.
Hence the edit.

Reread your post and I see the edit now.

I think we all need to take some anti skim reading classes

[DonkeyApple]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Doesn't your prejudice mean you now have to buy a BMW or your car v bigot formulae is at risk of breaking down.

Would I be right in guessing that they haven't accepted a Punjabi marrying one of theirs?

[anonymous-user]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I've been through 3 BMWs and i might just end up getting another...

And 'yes' they initially had a problem but now occasionally they see sunlight coming from my bum and accept me fine, only wish it could be the other way round

[Jimbeaux]

Colonial said:

stitched said:

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Bing o said:

Jimbeaux said:

Bing o said:

TonyToniTone said:

Jimbeaux said:

Used to be such a nice place I hear.

Jimbeaux said:

IIRC, it certainly was far from a sthole then; what changed?.....oh, yea.

People like you lost power that's what happened.

Jim just misses people calling him "Masser" of a morning.

I think it's all our fault for not keeping the darkies in their place, what ho!

Big assumption on your part. Even ironic seeing as my wife is a racial minority.

Does she wear a white pinny and call you masser Jim?

Only if he asks nicely

Not even then. I find it telling, that you al like to label me neatly as a racist and then, upon finding my wife is a minority, resort to calling her some sort of subserveant. I would die for that woman without a minutes hesitation. ETA: If I am ever at a BT&P event, see to it that I don't see you two. If you think that's a bluff, then all the better for me.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 02:22

WTF, I might have banged heads a couple of times with Jim ( because he's an ignorant yank) but I never would have sunk to attacking his family.
Keep it clean peeps.
ETA: Never comment when halfway through a thread, though the sentiment remains the same.

Edited by stitched on Wednesday 17th November 20:41

Come on, it’s been dealt with. And if someone brings up something like that, in the context of a thread, then it’s fair game to make a joke about it in the same thread. Well, that’s my position on the matter anyway.

You don't want something talked about, don't bring it up online.

Bringing up that my wife is a minority does not invite people calling me her "masser", etc. But as you say, that was yesterday; longer in PH years.

[Jimbeaux]

Colonial said:

stitched said:

Colonial said:

stitched said:

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Bing o said:

Jimbeaux said:

Bing o said:

TonyToniTone said:

Jimbeaux said:

Used to be such a nice place I hear.

Jimbeaux said:

IIRC, it certainly was far from a sthole then; what changed?.....oh, yea.

People like you lost power that's what happened.

Jim just misses people calling him "Masser" of a morning.

I think it's all our fault for not keeping the darkies in their place, what ho!

Big assumption on your part. Even ironic seeing as my wife is a racial minority.

Does she wear a white pinny and call you masser Jim?

Only if he asks nicely

Not even then. I find it telling, that you al like to label me neatly as a racist and then, upon finding my wife is a minority, resort to calling her some sort of subserveant. I would die for that woman without a minutes hesitation. ETA: If I am ever at a BT&P event, see to it that I don't see you two. If you think that's a bluff, then all the better for me.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 02:22

WTF, I might have banged heads a couple of times with Jim ( because he's an ignorant yank) but I never would have sunk to attacking his family.
Keep it clean peeps.
ETA: Never comment when halfway through a thread, though the sentiment remains the same.

Edited by stitched on Wednesday 17th November 20:41

Come on, it’s been dealt with. And if someone brings up something like that, in the context of a thread, then it’s fair game to make a joke about it in the same thread. Well, that’s my position on the matter anyway.

You don't want something talked about, don't bring it up online.

I realised that as I went through, just caught me halfway as OTT.
Hence the edit.

Reread your post and I see the edit now.

I think we all need to take some anti skim reading classes

You are probably right about that.

[Jimbeaux]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

What, you accepting them you mean? Think of it as making her feel better and you may have more reason.

[Pints]

Jimbeaux said:

DonkeyApple said:

Jasandjules said:

Pints said:

The savagery of Africa has existed long before they learned to hate the white colonial, and will continue to thrive long after they have wiped the white invaders from their continent. These are the savages of Africa and the power, violence and cruelty they possess, in all its forms, on the continent they call home, is beyond the ken of you or I.

Actually, it was exactly this train of thought which led me to immediately be suspicious that the driver and the husband escaped unharmed.

Violence being such a way of life for some and of course they do murder the lady, let yet two blokes go? Especially if one is somewhat wealthy and might well have been able to give them more money etc..

As for the "suspect" - I might be a tad cynical here but it's very convenient for tourism that someone has been caught so quickly when so many crimes go unchecked....

You need to understand that you are dealing with very binary, low functioning creatures at this point.

They had taken everything from the husband, the driver had nothing. The woman had something left to give.

Think as well that in societies like the townships women are treated differently from men, they are a rung below socially.

Low functioning animals do not think or plan ahead and operate for the moment and what is on the table at that instance.

It really is as simple as that. You are looking at this from Western eyes, but trundle down to one of our worst estates and you will see the same sub human actions and processing.

So instinct trumps reason.....like say, the way it does in animals?

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 20:56

Quite. Which is pretty much my point. We reason, that doesn't mean they do.
And our biggest flaw as modern Westerners is that we expect them to.
Our ancestors weren't that naive.

[Jimbeaux]

Pints said:

Jimbeaux said:

DonkeyApple said:

Jasandjules said:

Pints said:

The savagery of Africa has existed long before they learned to hate the white colonial, and will continue to thrive long after they have wiped the white invaders from their continent. These are the savages of Africa and the power, violence and cruelty they possess, in all its forms, on the continent they call home, is beyond the ken of you or I.

Actually, it was exactly this train of thought which led me to immediately be suspicious that the driver and the husband escaped unharmed.

Violence being such a way of life for some and of course they do murder the lady, let yet two blokes go? Especially if one is somewhat wealthy and might well have been able to give them more money etc..

As for the "suspect" - I might be a tad cynical here but it's very convenient for tourism that someone has been caught so quickly when so many crimes go unchecked....

You need to understand that you are dealing with very binary, low functioning creatures at this point.

They had taken everything from the husband, the driver had nothing. The woman had something left to give.

Think as well that in societies like the townships women are treated differently from men, they are a rung below socially.

Low functioning animals do not think or plan ahead and operate for the moment and what is on the table at that instance.

It really is as simple as that. You are looking at this from Western eyes, but trundle down to one of our worst estates and you will see the same sub human actions and processing.

So instinct trumps reason.....like say, the way it does in animals?

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 20:56

Quite. Which is pretty much my point. We reason, that doesn't mean they do.
And our biggest flaw as modern Westerners is that we expect them to.
Our ancestors weren't that naive.

And there it is, the next hard point! PCers and hand ringers today paint our ancestors as savages and idiots. Perhaps they did indeed know better.

[Colonial]

Jimbeaux said:

Pints said:

Jimbeaux said:

DonkeyApple said:

Jasandjules said:

Pints said:

The savagery of Africa has existed long before they learned to hate the white colonial, and will continue to thrive long after they have wiped the white invaders from their continent. These are the savages of Africa and the power, violence and cruelty they possess, in all its forms, on the continent they call home, is beyond the ken of you or I.

Actually, it was exactly this train of thought which led me to immediately be suspicious that the driver and the husband escaped unharmed.

Violence being such a way of life for some and of course they do murder the lady, let yet two blokes go? Especially if one is somewhat wealthy and might well have been able to give them more money etc..

As for the "suspect" - I might be a tad cynical here but it's very convenient for tourism that someone has been caught so quickly when so many crimes go unchecked....

You need to understand that you are dealing with very binary, low functioning creatures at this point.

They had taken everything from the husband, the driver had nothing. The woman had something left to give.

Think as well that in societies like the townships women are treated differently from men, they are a rung below socially.

Low functioning animals do not think or plan ahead and operate for the moment and what is on the table at that instance.

It really is as simple as that. You are looking at this from Western eyes, but trundle down to one of our worst estates and you will see the same sub human actions and processing.

So instinct trumps reason.....like say, the way it does in animals?

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 20:56

Quite. Which is pretty much my point. We reason, that doesn't mean they do.
And our biggest flaw as modern Westerners is that we expect them to.
Our ancestors weren't that naive.

And there it is, the next hard point! PCers and hand ringers today paint our ancestors as savages and idiots. Perhaps they did indeed know better.

Yeah those darkies were much happier and better off when they knew their place a-pickin cotton and a-cleanin our houses

[Pints]

Colonial said:

Yeah those darkies were much happier and better off when they knew their place a-pickin cotton and a-cleanin our houses

Of course not. They're obviously much happier murdering and raping our women, given the alarming frequency with which they do it.

I don't suppose anyone here is suggesting the days of slavery were better, but our ancestors certainly knew better than to let them run a country. Times, they have a changed and now look at the state of almost every country which is under black rule. And please don't think I'm alone in thinking this; have you watched the youtube I posted earlier in the thread?

Quite simply, they have not shown to have the capacity, as a people, to successfully run a civilised country.

[thinfourth2]

Pints said:

Quite simply, they have not shown to have the capacity, as a people, to successfully run a civilised country.

But what about America they have a black running the country.

Oh sorry I didn't see the civilized country bit.

[Colonial]

thinfourth2 said:

Pints said:

Quite simply, they have not shown to have the capacity, as a people, to successfully run a civilised country.

But what about America they have a black running the country.

Oh sorry I didn't see the civilized country bit.

Yeah, but he's half white so he obviously must be only half as bad as the rest of them

[Pints]

Colonial said:

thinfourth2 said:

Pints said:

Quite simply, they have not shown to have the capacity, as a people, to successfully run a civilised country.

But what about America they have a black running the country.

Oh sorry I didn't see the civilized country bit.

Yeah, but he's half white so he obviously must be only half as bad as the rest of them

A black president does not mean a black government. But rather than banging your head (don't worry, I feel that way too sometimes) do feel free to explain why Africa is doing such a cracking job running things. Under white rule, SA did a reasonable job economically given the sanctions imposed on it. All sanctions lifted and under black rule SA is destroying itself (much like the rest of Africa).

Bear in mind that what you see in the OP is only what makes it onto the international news. Local stories of rape, murder and tragedy are even more dire, and on a daily basis. Why? The government just don't care. Don't believe me? See the other youtube clip I linked earlier in the thread.

Edited by Pints on Friday 19th November 08:57

[anonymous-user]

Bottom line is that under white rule SA was a success, same thing with India really. I now technically blame India and Pakistans troubles on the Brits. You should have never left us! Same logic can be applied to Saddam and Iraq.

Maybe they needed the iron fist approach in order to keep the peace. Food for thought.

[Jimbeaux]

Colonial said:

Jimbeaux said:

Pints said:

Jimbeaux said:

DonkeyApple said:

Jasandjules said:

Pints said:

The savagery of Africa has existed long before they learned to hate the white colonial, and will continue to thrive long after they have wiped the white invaders from their continent. These are the savages of Africa and the power, violence and cruelty they possess, in all its forms, on the continent they call home, is beyond the ken of you or I.

Actually, it was exactly this train of thought which led me to immediately be suspicious that the driver and the husband escaped unharmed.

Violence being such a way of life for some and of course they do murder the lady, let yet two blokes go? Especially if one is somewhat wealthy and might well have been able to give them more money etc..

As for the "suspect" - I might be a tad cynical here but it's very convenient for tourism that someone has been caught so quickly when so many crimes go unchecked....

You need to understand that you are dealing with very binary, low functioning creatures at this point.

They had taken everything from the husband, the driver had nothing. The woman had something left to give.

Think as well that in societies like the townships women are treated differently from men, they are a rung below socially.

Low functioning animals do not think or plan ahead and operate for the moment and what is on the table at that instance.

It really is as simple as that. You are looking at this from Western eyes, but trundle down to one of our worst estates and you will see the same sub human actions and processing.

So instinct trumps reason.....like say, the way it does in animals?

Edited by Jimbeaux on Wednesday 17th November 20:56

Quite. Which is pretty much my point. We reason, that doesn't mean they do.
And our biggest flaw as modern Westerners is that we expect them to.
Our ancestors weren't that naive.

And there it is, the next hard point! PCers and hand ringers today paint our ancestors as savages and idiots. Perhaps they did indeed know better.

Yeah those darkies were much happier and better off when they knew their place a-pickin cotton and a-cleanin our houses

Probably so compared to the 600% increase in black on black death that is ocurring today.

[Pints]

Jimbeaux said:

Colonial said:

Yeah those darkies were much happier and better off when they knew their place a-pickin cotton and a-cleanin our houses

Probably so compared to the 600% increase in black on black death that is ocurring today.

Don't be daft. With such talk, how will us white folk be able to show guilt and remorse for the actions of our ancestors?