Billionaire to Build Titanic II

Billionaire to Build Titanic II

Author
Discussion

crofty1984

15,934 posts

206 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Article said:
Asked if his replica would sink he said: "Yeah, if you put a big hole in it!"
I like him.

Disastrous

10,094 posts

219 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Very Clive cussleresque. I predict a disaster at sea and Dirk Pitt saving the day.

0a

23,906 posts

196 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all


Haha!

Zwolf

25,867 posts

208 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
0a said:


Haha!
hehe

Pagey

1,372 posts

236 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Kays vRS said:
This isn't going to go down well ...
If they design it incorrectly it just might.......

TheTurbonator

2,792 posts

153 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all


I think it'd be great if it was just a replica as a museum piece but as for a fully operational ship then surley it'll be a PR disaster?

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

233 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
0a said:


Haha!
Telling, isn't it? hehe

Zwolf

25,867 posts

208 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
TheTurbonator said:


I think it'd be great if it was just a replica as a museum piece but as for a fully operational ship then surley it'll be a PR disaster?
Fail. Titanic was White Star Line, that ship has a Cunard front and look suspiciously like "The Queen Mary II".

TheTurbonator

2,792 posts

153 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Zwolf said:
TheTurbonator said:


I think it'd be great if it was just a replica as a museum piece but as for a fully operational ship then surley it'll be a PR disaster?
Fail. Titanic was White Star Line, that ship has a Cunard front and look suspiciously like "The Queen Mary II".
It's only a crappy B-Movie.

Wikipedia said:
For the film, the RMS Queen Mary was used as a stand-in for the SS Titanic II during the departure scenes and some of its interiors .

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

244 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Zwolf said:
Fail. Titanic was White Star Line, that ship has a Cunard front and look suspiciously like "The Queen Mary II".
Try having sex with a girl sometime.

DrTre

12,955 posts

234 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Zwolf said:
Fail. Titanic was White Star Line, that ship has a Cunard front and look suspiciously like "The Queen Mary II".
Try having sex with a girl sometime.
Z: "Alright darlin, fancy coming back to my place. I'll give you a treat you'll never forget, I'm a bit gifted you see cos I go down like the Titanic I do. Hahaha"

Lady: "Hahahahah!! OK, that sounds like fun, let's go"

Z: "Awe.some. Get in! Let's go. The Titanic was run by White Star Line, don't you know, yeah, sister ship of Olympic and Britannic. Some people get really confused between the White Star Line front end and the Cunard front end, or bow as it's known to us nautical folk. How you can confuse them is beyond me, it really is, one's got the bevelled plimsoll line while the other has it concave!! Where are you going? Come back. Hey. Come back. I've not even told you of the contra rotating propellor drive they were thinking of installing"

Pixel Pusher

10,197 posts

161 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
DrTre said:
Z: "Awe.some. Get in! Let's go. The Titanic was run by White Star Line, don't you know, yeah, sister ship of Olympic and Britannic. Some people get really confused between the White Star Line front end and the Cunard front end, or bow as it's known to us nautical folk. How you can confuse them is beyond me, it really is, one's got the bevelled plimsoll line while the other has it concave!! Where are you going? Come back. Hey. Come back. I've not even told you of the contra rotating propellor drive they were thinking of installing"
Wow. Zwolf really know his stuff doesn't he?

yes

DrTre

12,955 posts

234 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Pixel Pusher said:
Wow. Zwolf really know his stuff doesn't he?

yes
I fell for it. Silver tongue charmer that he is...

Pixel Pusher

10,197 posts

161 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
He had me at "Awe.some".


Zwolf

25,867 posts

208 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Try having sex with a girl sometime.
No thanks, I prefer women. tongue out

Here is where we are free to geek out as you can't do it in real life with real people about. You'd never get laid. This as I understand it is the primary function of the internet generally and forums in particular.

nerd

I shall remember this next time you assert that an old donkey is wearing the wrong wing mirrors or wheels.

LukeSi

5,753 posts

163 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Zwolf said:
Who in their right mind would ever buy a ticket for its maiden voyage? hehe

I love the idea of it though, although I'd rather see a faithful recreation, steam engines and all. An aquatic Orient Express experience, a slice of Edwardian luxury - even if it is slower and less efficient than modern cruise liners that by comparison mostly look ghastly.

I eagerly await a follow up with a (sort of) sister ship named Poseidon.
Actually Titanic was faster than modern cruise liners hehe

RDMcG

19,238 posts

209 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Are the tickets one-way or return?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
RDMcG said:
Are the tickets one-way or return?
Part way.

davepoth

29,395 posts

201 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
LukeSi said:
Actually Titanic was faster than modern cruise liners hehe
QM2 can go a fair bit quicker - 30kts vs. Titanic's 24. By the end of the Atlantic liner period they were doing some pretty daft speeds - SS United States averaged the transatlantic crossing at 35.59kts, which is around 40mph.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Back in the day an ocean liner was a means to get from A-B and not somewhere just to be.

Titanic is tiny vs the big cruise ships now.