The Next Conservative Budget

Author
Discussion

Camoradi

4,300 posts

258 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
jonah35 said:
Thanks for clarification.

It would be interesting to see some examples.
I think this might be somewhere close, although I'm sure Eric or others could clarify if not.

Example Single Person Ltd Co. T/O £60k taking tax free allowance as salary and dividends up to basic rate limit with some profit retained in business. Rough numbers

Pre budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £10,000 (no tax)
profit £40,000
corp tax at 20% - £8000
dividend £30,000
tax on dividend £0

total tax take £8000

Post budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £11,000 (no tax)
profit £39,000
corp tax at 18% - £7020
dividend £29,000
taxable dividend £24,000
tax on dividend at 7.5% - £1800

total tax take £8820

Eric Mc

122,327 posts

267 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Seems OK to me - although you've ignored the NI implications of the salary amounts shown in both examples.

over_the_hill

3,194 posts

248 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Cap on charges imposed by claims management companies and an increase in insurance premium tax to 9.5% from November

Camoradi

4,300 posts

258 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Seems OK to me - although you've ignored the NI implications of the salary amounts shown in both examples.
Too difficult for me, Eric. Thanks though thumbup

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

214 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all


A couple of thoughts:

On Pre-Budget...the net divi is £32k, which you need to gross up to £35k to find that you've hit the higher rate threshold, so more tax due.
On Post-Budget...the divi is £32k (which added to the £10k salary is under standard rate - this bit needs clarifying), so 7.5% on £27k

Zoon

6,731 posts

123 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Camoradi said:
I think this might be somewhere close, although I'm sure Eric or others could clarify if not.

Example Single Person Ltd Co. T/O £60k taking tax free allowance as salary and dividends up to basic rate limit with some profit retained in business. Rough numbers

Pre budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £10,000 (no tax)
profit £40,000
corp tax at 20% - £8000
dividend £30,000
tax on dividend £0

total tax take £8000

Post budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £11,000 (no tax)
profit £39,000
corp tax at 18% - £7020
dividend £29,000
taxable dividend £24,000
tax on dividend at 7.5% - £1800

total tax take £8820
Sounds rather rubbish if that's right.

bobbylondonuk

2,199 posts

192 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Zoon said:
Camoradi said:
I think this might be somewhere close, although I'm sure Eric or others could clarify if not.

Example Single Person Ltd Co. T/O £60k taking tax free allowance as salary and dividends up to basic rate limit with some profit retained in business. Rough numbers

Pre budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £10,000 (no tax)
profit £40,000
corp tax at 20% - £8000
dividend £30,000
tax on dividend £0

total tax take £8000

Post budget
turnover £60,000
expenses £10,000
salary £11,000 (no tax)
profit £39,000
corp tax at 18% - £7020
dividend £29,000
taxable dividend £24,000
tax on dividend at 7.5% - £1800

total tax take £8820
Sounds rather rubbish if that's right.
Why?

Pegscratch

1,872 posts

110 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
bobbylondonuk said:
Why?
Because they want to stop the poor scrounging and working the system, but don't want to stop working the system themselves. The tax man is catching up on the current loopholes, and their gravy train is looking a little worse for wear.

That they're still £5k better off than they would be on PAYE and paying it all as salary doesn't compute. They're worse off now that their (legal) fiddle is being clamped down on, and that's all that matters.

Because we're all in it together means stopping the poor getting handouts, not stopping them avoiding paying.

Edited by Pegscratch on Wednesday 8th July 14:59

worsy

5,836 posts

177 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
A couple of thoughts:

On Pre-Budget...the net divi is £32k, which you need to gross up to £35k to find that you've hit the higher rate threshold, so more tax due.
On Post-Budget...the divi is £32k (which added to the £10k salary is under standard rate - this bit needs clarifying), 5k tax free dividends so so 7.5% on £27k-5k = 22k
Edited as i understand it

otolith

56,738 posts

206 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Interesting changes to limit tax credits and benefits to the first two children.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

214 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
worsy said:
Edited as i understand it
no, the divi is £32k of which £5k is tax free so you're taxed on £27k.

Eric Mc

122,327 posts

267 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
He mentioned in the speech that the 10% Notional Tax Credit will be abolished.

Under the current system, a person who receives (say) a £10,000 dividend payment into their hand, is DEEMED to have received a Grossed Up dividend of £11,111.11 on which £1,111.11 tax has been deducted. It is the £11,111.11 amount that is used when working out the person's gross income for tax assessment purposes i.e. it's the Gross Dividend of £11,111.11 that will be added to their overall income to see if their income has exceeded the Higher Rate Tax threshold.

With the abolition of the 10% Notional Tax Credit, this grossing up exercise on dividends will not be required.

0000

13,812 posts

193 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
They'd take about £1750 less from a contractor on around £115k with £5k expenses under the new rules, using those other numbers above, by my reckoning. Although, they'd be paying significantly more than £8k in tax anyway.

130R

6,815 posts

208 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Not keen on the VED changes (the 'premium' band sounds like it is going to be very expensive), the rest of it is decent though.

toohangry

416 posts

111 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Pegscratch said:
Because they want to stop the poor scrounging and working the system, but don't want to stop working the system themselves. The tax man is catching up on the current loopholes, and their gravy train is looking a little worse for wear.

That they're still £5k better off than they would be on PAYE and paying it all as salary doesn't compute. They're worse off now that their (legal) fiddle is being clamped down on, and that's all that matters.

Because we're all in it together means stopping the poor getting handouts, not stopping them avoiding paying.

Edited by Pegscratch on Wednesday 8th July 14:59
rofl Bitter much at his failings?

So I risk my house, my pension and my savings in order to run my business and create a lot of jobs and yet you resent the way I'm taxed?

emicen

8,609 posts

220 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Pegscratch said:
bobbylondonuk said:
Why?
Because they want to stop the poor scrounging and working the system, but don't want to stop working the system themselves. The tax man is catching up on the current loopholes, and their gravy train is looking a little worse for wear.

That they're still £5k better off than they would be on PAYE and paying it all as salary doesn't compute. They're worse off now that their (legal) fiddle is being clamped down on, and that's all that matters.

Because we're all in it together means stopping the poor getting handouts, not stopping them avoiding paying.

Edited by Pegscratch on Wednesday 8th July 14:59
Show your working, then tell us what an acceptable reward for effectively zero job security is (working optional for the latter).

JagLover

42,710 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Overall a decent budget I thought

The planned cuts in departmental spending were curtailed, as they needed to be.

The combined affect of the minimum wage hike and welfare reductions is that the government will start to scale back on the state paying for a low wage economy and also paying for people's lifestyle choices.


R8VXF

6,788 posts

117 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
130R said:
Not keen on the VED changes (the 'premium' band sounds like it is going to be very expensive), the rest of it is decent though.
Still works out cheaper in year 2 and beyond than the highest rate currently. Think it was circa £450 inclusive of the premium tax

Elroy Blue

8,693 posts

194 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
Some typical creative accounting to make headlines. Defence 2%, let's all cheer.
Actually, it's currently 2.1% (so a cut) and the 2% will include money from the 'aid' budget and Counter Terrorism that is currently not included.
Great!

130R

6,815 posts

208 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
R8VXF said:
Still works out cheaper in year 2 and beyond than the highest rate currently. Think it was circa £450 inclusive of the premium tax
That's assuming you are paying the additional £310 for years 2-6 of ownership on top of the "average cost" of £140 though unless I am missing something. If your car costs over £40K and is in the "premium" band I assume you pay £310 on top of whatever the "premium" band is going to cost.