Peaches Geldof found dead.
Discussion
ali_kat said:
I was replying to you.
I was agreeing with you that there was no need for the poster you had quoted post. If I hadn't quoted you it would have made no sense what so ever.
I haven't said you are wrong, again I was replying to you to say that.
People do reply to other people & then add other thoughts too, it doesn't mean it is all aimed at the same person.
You are getting reacting unnecessarily. I don't have a beef with anyone, just think that particular other poster is rather pathetic in his actions last night.
Crikey this is getting derailed, sorry everyone.I was agreeing with you that there was no need for the poster you had quoted post. If I hadn't quoted you it would have made no sense what so ever.
I haven't said you are wrong, again I was replying to you to say that.
People do reply to other people & then add other thoughts too, it doesn't mean it is all aimed at the same person.
You are getting reacting unnecessarily. I don't have a beef with anyone, just think that particular other poster is rather pathetic in his actions last night.
As I'm sure you're well aware, if you want to be precise in your responses then you need to take the time to edit them properly. I've gone back and looked and your responses are to me, even though you've now back-pedalled somewhat and said they weren't. You are reacting unnecessarily instead of just leaving it. You don't have a beef with anyone of course - except the poster you have a beef with
I'm going to bed.
Enjoy your sleep rxtx
I'm not awake because I'm sat at my laptop at my desk not having yet gone to my bed, I'm awake in a cold & lonely hotel room due to the f
king awful reoccurring nightmares about my mother screaming in pain during her last night in this world, so I'm a little grumpy. I'm also posting from my phone so don't have the ability to dissect every nested quote to individually reply.
You have not said anything in your original post that could even be considered as me then saying you need to admit you are wrong?
as to why your knickers are so twisted.
not quite the right response there 
I'm not awake because I'm sat at my laptop at my desk not having yet gone to my bed, I'm awake in a cold & lonely hotel room due to the f
king awful reoccurring nightmares about my mother screaming in pain during her last night in this world, so I'm a little grumpy. I'm also posting from my phone so don't have the ability to dissect every nested quote to individually reply. You have not said anything in your original post that could even be considered as me then saying you need to admit you are wrong?
as to why your knickers are so twisted.rxtx said:
Kinky said:
I think some knickers need to be untwisted.
Get changed not quite the right response there Edited by ali_kat on Thursday 1st May 05:27
ali_kat said:
I'm amazed at the results to be honest. Either a huge cover up by her family or they really had no idea, & whoever cleared up afterwards must have done a damn good job not to arouse the suspicions of the Police or Coroner. The one who found the body would have been searched, so if they removed the evidence they left her & the baby alone after finding her, or someone would have seen them surely?
That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
Quite a few I'd imagine once he gets on the smack. That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
MajorProblem said:
ali_kat said:
I'm amazed at the results to be honest. Either a huge cover up by her family or they really had no idea, & whoever cleared up afterwards must have done a damn good job not to arouse the suspicions of the Police or Coroner. The one who found the body would have been searched, so if they removed the evidence they left her & the baby alone after finding her, or someone would have seen them surely?
That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
Quite a few I'd imagine once he gets on the smack. That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
MajorProblem said:
ali_kat said:
I'm amazed at the results to be honest. Either a huge cover up by her family or they really had no idea, & whoever cleared up afterwards must have done a damn good job not to arouse the suspicions of the Police or Coroner. The one who found the body would have been searched, so if they removed the evidence they left her & the baby alone after finding her, or someone would have seen them surely?
That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
Quite a few I'd imagine once he gets on the smack. That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
FiF said:
May I most sincerely apologise to the entire PH community for starting this thread. If there had been the slightest inkling of just what woodlice would come creeping out from the forum skirting boards then the thread would not have been started.
I am out.
Not your fault. But it lowers still further my opinion of some of the contributors.I am out.
If only there was an 'ignore' button.
longblackcoat said:
MajorProblem said:
ali_kat said:
I'm amazed at the results to be honest. Either a huge cover up by her family or they really had no idea, & whoever cleared up afterwards must have done a damn good job not to arouse the suspicions of the Police or Coroner. The one who found the body would have been searched, so if they removed the evidence they left her & the baby alone after finding her, or someone would have seen them surely?
That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
Quite a few I'd imagine once he gets on the smack. That poor little boy was witness, I wonder what scars he's going to have as a result
The cycle of doom has repeated itself once, happen it may again.
A sad, but not unexpected outcome.
ali_kat said:
I'm amazed at the results to be honest. Either a huge cover up by her family or they really had no idea, & whoever cleared up afterwards must have done a damn good job not to arouse the suspicions of the Police or Coroner. The one who found the body would have been searched, so if they removed the evidence they left her & the baby alone after finding her, or someone would have seen them surely?
A) How do you know the police / coroner didn't have a good idea prior to the toxicology results? I imagine the former had a reasonable idea quite quickly. B) Do you need to take the heroin at the place where you overdose on it? There also doesn't need to be much paraphernalia, and that can be disposed of by the user quite quickly. Although to be fair, she'd have to be fast! 10 Pence Short said:
Sadly looks like a selfish act. I only hope her kids grow up and come to understand their mother was a fook up rather than a martyr.
The mods delete button will be self destructing at that one !It's not the usual "see the other persons point of view type" post you usually post.
happens to be what a lot will be thinking though
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff