Superinjunction threads

[anonymous-user]

Free speech update: Reynolds defence reaffirmed by Supreme Court in Flood v Times. Public interest defence still available to responsible journalists.

[DanDC5]

Breadvan72 said:

In the latest case, the schleb asserts that the film is a lie, and objecting to a lie is not bending the law.

Edited by Breadvan72 on Wednesday 21st March 19:39

Is it just I who finds it amusing, after all the protest and legal threats she then posts a video on YouTube to admit that actually it is her.

[anonymous-user]

Amusing, yes, but now she ought to pay costs and damages.

[Halb]

jbudgie said:

It's celebrities and other rich people using their money to bend the rules ( i.e. use the law) in a way that ordinary people wouldn't have the means to.

Or politicians, like that foul creature Caroline Spelman.

[Halb]

roadmap said:

I agree the lucky jammy bds

Aren't we all rich and famous here?

[thinfourth2]

i'm not