Scottish Politics / Independence - Vol 12

Scottish Politics / Independence - Vol 12

Author
Discussion

Mammasaid

3,924 posts

99 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
alangla said:
TheJimi said:
Yep, Sturgeon absolutely exploited the "bastirt toaree" effect in a way that no FM before her did.

Humza was going down the exact same toxic path.
I think the picture on the front page of the Herald and Scotsman today unfortunately sums up the past, present and near future of politics in Scotland. Nothing’s likely to change and the same individual appears to still be in charge https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxe81my5d2yo
From the Telegraph


irc

7,500 posts

138 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Trouble ahead. The leader of the Scottish BMA on Radio Scotland this morning asked how the NHS could be sorted out. Higher pay was the gist of the reply. To which the presenter said "but you got 12.5% last year". The reply being "and an agreement to negotiate in future years. So last year's higher than rUK solution presented as Scotland being better was a 1 year only solution.

Edited by irc on Wednesday 8th May 12:23

Klippie

3,223 posts

147 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Everyone has seen pictures of Sturgeon when she first arrived in politics, and to be truthful not the prettiest bairn in the world, with some women looks is a big thing, I think this has been a factor of her hatred, wake up in the morning look in the mirror and have a bit of a rage.

Cruel yes…but probably true.??

Evercross

6,082 posts

66 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
irc said:
Trouble ahead. The leader of the Scottish BMA on Radio Scotland this morning asked how the NHS could be sorted out. Higher pay was the gist of the reply. To which the presenter said "but you got 12.5% last year". The reply being "and an agreement to negotiate in future years. So last year's higher than rUK solution presented as Scotland being better was a 1 year only solution.
Here's a 'you heard it here first' moment, so mark the date.

Rumours rumbling along that a fundamental change in the Scottish schooling system is being seriously considered - shortening the primary school years from seven to six. This is being floated as "bringing Scotland into line with other nations" where children start school later, but in reality it is on the table because drastic cuts are required in Scotland's public services wage bills and this is seen as a way to make them palatable in the education sector.

The ground was already prepared for this in how CfE has been implemented, in particular with regards to Interdisciplinary Learning in the early secondary years Broad General Education (or the Primarification of the Secondary Curriculum as I have been calling it amongst my colleagues for a decade now). In practice this means having (IMO substandard) generic lessons that can be delivered by non-subject specialists to Secondary 1 and Secondary 2 pupils, thus allowing Primary qualified teachers who are surplus to requirements in the shrunken Primary sector to be transferred to posts in Secondary schools to fill the gaps left by retiring secondary teachers.

They will no doubt attempt to spin it as a positive thing, avoiding/denying all accusations that it is yet another step in the downgrading of the quality of the Scottish Education system, necessitated by financial constraints caused by profligacy and wastage and the lack of accountability of the public sector as a result of two decades of incompetent, neglectful SNP oversight coming home to roost.

Edited by Evercross on Wednesday 8th May 17:46

Master Of Puppets

3,299 posts

64 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Klippie said:
Everyone has seen pictures of Sturgeon when she first arrived in politics, and to be truthful not the prettiest bairn in the world, with some women looks is a big thing, I think this has been a factor of her hatred, wake up in the morning look in the mirror and have a bit of a rage.

Cruel yes…but probably true.??
You're probably right Klippie, she never looks comfortable any time she has ever had to stand next a stunner. Probably why there
are no lookers in the party, well none that I've seen anyway, beauty is in the eye of the beholder however and there is likely
to be one or two that think she is gorgeous, Stevie Wonder maybe. hehe

cuprabob

14,809 posts

216 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Master Of Puppets said:
...and there is likely
to be one or two that think she is gorgeous,
I believe some in France do smile

alangla

4,905 posts

183 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
I can see some of the (entirely financial) logic in this, but presumably it would have to be balanced by kids staying in nursery until the start of P2. If that’s the case, then a) where are all these extra places going to come from given the councils seem to have most of theirs filled and the private sector appears to be on its backside b) if the commitment to 30? hours a week nursery education from age 3 remains then surely that’ll eliminate a lot of the saving? c) would that also leave the Scottish Government on the hook for funding nursery places over the summer between what’s now P1 & P2 where parents are currently having to make their own arrangements?

Sounds like another ill thought through policy, so it’ll no doubt be about to happen.

alangla

4,905 posts

183 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all

Evercross

6,082 posts

66 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
alangla said:
Well, colour me (not in the slightest bit) surprised. She was never going to get the health or education briefs as that would have put her in conflict with the Greens Marxists. It had to be either finance or DFM.

Hereward

4,214 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Master Of Puppets said:
Klippie said:
Everyone has seen pictures of Sturgeon when she first arrived in politics, and to be truthful not the prettiest bairn in the world, with some women looks is a big thing, I think this has been a factor of her hatred, wake up in the morning look in the mirror and have a bit of a rage.

Cruel yes…but probably true.??
You're probably right Klippie, she never looks comfortable any time she has ever had to stand next a stunner. Probably why there
are no lookers in the party, well none that I've seen anyway, beauty is in the eye of the beholder however and there is likely
to be one or two that think she is gorgeous, Stevie Wonder maybe. hehe
I would be interested to read anonymoususer's thoughts on this matter.

cuprabob

14,809 posts

216 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Evercross said:
alangla said:
Well, colour me (not in the slightest bit) surprised. She was never going to get the health or education briefs as that would have put her in conflict with the Greens Marxists. It had to be either finance or DFM.
She can slot right in to the FM role when Swinney retires the day after the election.

sherman

13,442 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
cuprabob said:
Evercross said:
alangla said:
Well, colour me (not in the slightest bit) surprised. She was never going to get the health or education briefs as that would have put her in conflict with the Greens Marxists. It had to be either finance or DFM.
She can slot right in to the FM role when Swinney retires the day after the election.
She had already done Finance so anything less than Deputy FM eould be a step down.
Im guessing trans stuff will be binned now with those 2 in charge.

Roderick Spode

3,170 posts

51 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
cuprabob said:
Evercross said:
alangla said:
Well, colour me (not in the slightest bit) surprised. She was never going to get the health or education briefs as that would have put her in conflict with the Greens Marxists. It had to be either finance or DFM.
She can slot right in to the FM role when Swinney retires the day after the election.
My thoughts precisely. Honest John takes the fall for the impending election crises (hopefully) coming, he retires having endured one last ignominious bus accident, Kate breezes in as his natural successor. Peewee and Big Bird will be fizzing at her appointment, as she will be a dissenter to their insane policies.

A.J.M

7,947 posts

188 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
So how many buses have ran over dishonest John now?

Got to be a big one waiting on the hard shoulder ready to run him down this time.

Olivera

7,250 posts

241 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
One thing I don't quite understand - what's in it for Swinney to return, but then get trounced at the next general election, then the Scottish parliament election, and then to stand down? All just to head off immediate infighting (more socially conservative vs woke crackpottery factions) in the SNP if Forbes was leader?

alangla

4,905 posts

183 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Olivera said:
One thing I don't quite understand - what's in it for Swinney to return, but then get trounced at the next general election, then the Scottish parliament election, and then to stand down? All just to head off immediate infighting (more socially conservative vs woke crackpottery factions) in the SNP if Forbes was leader?
Couple of years of more cash, marginally better pension, the prestige of having a framed photo on the staircase in Bute House and more money on the corporate speaker circuit after retirement?

Error_404_Username_not_found

2,307 posts

53 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Olivera said:
One thing I don't quite understand - what's in it for Swinney to return, but then get trounced at the next general election, then the Scottish parliament election, and then to stand down? All just to head off immediate infighting (more socially conservative vs woke crackpottery factions) in the SNP if Forbes was leader?
Fat public funded salary followed by retirement on a fat public funded pension? Can't think of another upside for him.

malks222

1,867 posts

141 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
alangla said:
I can see some of the (entirely financial) logic in this, but presumably it would have to be balanced by kids staying in nursery until the start of P2. If that’s the case, then a) where are all these extra places going to come from given the councils seem to have most of theirs filled and the private sector appears to be on its backside b) if the commitment to 30? hours a week nursery education from age 3 remains then surely that’ll eliminate a lot of the saving? c) would that also leave the Scottish Government on the hook for funding nursery places over the summer between what’s now P1 & P2 where parents are currently having to make their own arrangements?

Sounds like another ill thought through policy, so it’ll no doubt be about to happen.
just change the funding model for nurseries, move it forward a year. the funded 30hrs kicks in when your child turns 3, basically roll that forward to 4 and should solve part of the problem.

sherman

13,442 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Olivera said:
One thing I don't quite understand - what's in it for Swinney to return, but then get trounced at the next general election, then the Scottish parliament election, and then to stand down? All just to head off immediate infighting (more socially conservative vs woke crackpottery factions) in the SNP if Forbes was leader?
Pension pot.
He doesnt care about legacy.

NRS

22,263 posts

203 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Error_404_Username_not_found said:
Olivera said:
One thing I don't quite understand - what's in it for Swinney to return, but then get trounced at the next general election, then the Scottish parliament election, and then to stand down? All just to head off immediate infighting (more socially conservative vs woke crackpottery factions) in the SNP if Forbes was leader?
Fat public funded salary followed by retirement on a fat public funded pension? Can't think of another upside for him.
Possibly he also thinks it is best for the SNP anyway and takes one for the team? A lot of them are in it for the money, but some of them are also blind believers in Independence too. If he stood aside now and one of the "better" prospects in future has to lead the part into a bad election so that person is fired it means there's less chance of someone good taking over, rebuilding and delivering the dream post-election drubbing.

Master Of Puppets said:
Klippie said:
Everyone has seen pictures of Sturgeon when she first arrived in politics, and to be truthful not the prettiest bairn in the world, with some women looks is a big thing, I think this has been a factor of her hatred, wake up in the morning look in the mirror and have a bit of a rage.

Cruel yes…but probably true.??
You're probably right Klippie, she never looks comfortable any time she has ever had to stand next a stunner. Probably why there
are no lookers in the party, well none that I've seen anyway, beauty is in the eye of the beholder however and there is likely
to be one or two that think she is gorgeous, Stevie Wonder maybe. hehe
Just sounds a bit misogynistic to me. You'd likely not say the same if it was an ugly man in power.