Egypt Air flight MS804 missing!

Egypt Air flight MS804 missing!

Author
Discussion

ApOrbital

9,989 posts

119 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Could it have been one or more of the batteries exploding in the undercarriage?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egy...

EgyptAir flight MS804: Pilot spoke with air traffic control 'for several minutes before crash'


MarkRSi

5,782 posts

219 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
If true, it would explain why pilots don't bother contacting ATC with distress calls then...

J4CKO

41,729 posts

201 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
There used to be a RAF Flight Safety poster that stated: "In an Emergency, FLY THE AIRCRAFT".

I'll repeat that, just so the hard of thinking get it. "FLY THE AIRCRAFT".

If you forget this piece of sage advice you end up like Air France 447, or British Midland 92.

The next thing you do is deal with the Emergency. I can tell you from personal experience that no emergency is ever exactly like you what have practiced in the Sim (or, indeed, practiced airborne). Thus, despite how well trained you are, an emergency can be quite (brain) capacity sapping. Again, I can tell you this from personal experience.

Once you've done that, then you think about telling someone. Telling someone early, when you haven't got a handle on what's going on is guaranteed to mean you won't have given them enough infomation and it is guaranteed that they will come back with all sorts of Qs just when you are busy trying to action your Red Card drills (or whatever). Thereby sapping your capacity to cope further.

That is the way you do it. That is the only way you do it.

Now, those Microsoft Flight Sim Qualified Armchair Experts on this thread can chose to believe me (an ex RAF Multi-Engined Pilot and Qualified Flying Instructor), can chose to believe those qualified Airline pilots on this thread such as pushthebutton, el stovey, et al or, alternatively, you can continue to insist you know better about our profession than we do.

In which case, gentlemen, you are fking idiots.






Edited by Ginetta G15 Girl on Saturday 21st May 23:37
Oh, you were/are a pilot, funny that you have never mentioned it.....

Its a thread on a motoring website, it isnt an AAIB report, people are allowed an opinion and perhaps to be wrong without being called a "fking Idiot".





s3fella

10,524 posts

188 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
There used to be a RAF Flight Safety poster that stated: "In an Emergency, FLY THE AIRCRAFT".

I'll repeat that, just so the hard of thinking get it. "FLY THE AIRCRAFT".

If you forget this piece of sage advice you end up like Air France 447, or British Midland 92.

The next thing you do is deal with the Emergency. I can tell you from personal experience that no emergency is ever exactly like you what have practiced in the Sim (or, indeed, practiced airborne). Thus, despite how well trained you are, an emergency can be quite (brain) capacity sapping. Again, I can tell you this from personal experience.

Once you've done that, then you think about telling someone. Telling someone early, when you haven't got a handle on what's going on is guaranteed to mean you won't have given them enough infomation and it is guaranteed that they will come back with all sorts of Qs just when you are busy trying to action your Red Card drills (or whatever). Thereby sapping your capacity to cope further.

That is the way you do it. That is the only way you do it.

Now, those Microsoft Flight Sim Qualified Armchair Experts on this thread can chose to believe me (an ex RAF Multi-Engined Pilot and Qualified Flying Instructor), can chose to believe those qualified Airline pilots on this thread such as pushthebutton, el stovey, et al or, alternatively, you can continue to insist you know better about our profession than we do.

In which case, gentlemen, you are fking idiots.






Edited by Ginetta G15 Girl on Saturday 21st May 23:37
Oh, you were/are a pilot, funny that you have never mentioned it.....

Its a thread on a motoring website, it isnt an AAIB report, people are allowed an opinion and perhaps to be wrong without being called a "fking Idiot".
What she says may be true, but she is forgetting that "emergencies" don't always present themselves as "emergencies" straight away, they more often present themselves as some incident or unusual event, that often will mean pilot will talk to ATC. And if you believe some reports in media they may well have done so.
Something like a descent due to smoke is something worth asking about if you can, so as not to turn one event into something else, ie nice to know you're cleared down, helps you concentrate on what you need to.

Truth is, there are no hard and fast rules, only principles and ways of approaching whatever you may have going on. And interestingly, in commercial circles, often the first port of call for an incident or potential incident will be the Company's own ops centre if they're in range on company frequency. They don't always like to "advertise" an issue.

red_slr

17,363 posts

190 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Radio comms is generally rubbish anyway, ATC sometimes don't understand whats going on, have to repeat stuff etc. Just wastes time.
Listen to the ATC for the "Hudson" incident and it took ATC several goes to actually compute what the pilot was saying which is, we have no engines!
That just did not make sense to them. Then the info coming back was very simple. Cant. Wont. We will be in the Hudson. Etc. Minimal info. That's all at <3000' with normal cabin pressure, no smoke, noise etc.


anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
s3fella said:
And interestingly, in commercial circles, often the first port of call for an incident or potential incident will be the Company's own ops centre if they're in range on company frequency. They don't always like to "advertise" an issue.
How old school. hehe

mondeoman

11,430 posts

267 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egy...

EgyptAir flight MS804: Pilot spoke with air traffic control 'for several minutes before crash'
Why would the Egyptians lie about this? Doesn't make any sense, it's all recorded and will come out anyway.

MrBarry123

6,030 posts

122 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
What kind of idiots do you reckon they're fking?
Ones that don't know how to pilot an aircraft presumably?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
The Spruce goose said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egy...

EgyptAir flight MS804: Pilot spoke with air traffic control 'for several minutes before crash'
Why would the Egyptians lie about this? Doesn't make any sense, it's all recorded and will come out anyway.
I expect that any such news story will have conflicting information especially in the age of the Internet and press releases from multiple sources.

The only certainty is waiting for the full investigation.

I turn off the news now when the experts are wheeled out and interviews by wannabe reporters reading auto queue.

rohrl

8,754 posts

146 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
...gentlemen, you are fking idiots.
And there's that legendary charm of PH's most pointlessly argumentative member once again.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
mondeoman said:
The Spruce goose said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egy...

EgyptAir flight MS804: Pilot spoke with air traffic control 'for several minutes before crash'
Why would the Egyptians lie about this? Doesn't make any sense, it's all recorded and will come out anyway.
I expect that any such news story will have conflicting information especially in the age of the Internet and press releases from multiple sources.

The only certainty is waiting for the full investigation.

I turn off the news now when the experts are wheeled out and interviews by wannabe reporters reading auto queue.
I even saw travel corespondant Simon Calder giving his technical analysis the other day. hehe

He'd clearly just gone on some web forums and made some glib statements about "airline procedures" etc without actually saying anything.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Yeah, dodged that one as well.

News editors must have been a bit slow to get the "experts" for the news slot or the satellite truck was not at the experts house yet.

s3fella

10,524 posts

188 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
If this turns out to be a lipo battery fire, and that is a big "if", the implications for air travel are huge aren't they? It's interesting that on some airlines, if you need to put a bag in the hold when actually boarded, eg not enough room in overhead lockers, they make you take a laptop or tablet out and keep it with you because of the battery! And yet surely the hold already has such items anyway?

Configuration wise, if smoke developed in the front of the a/c could this be from the hold? Does it go that far forward?

LambShank

14,717 posts

190 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
I may have missed this, what with skim reading past the bickering...

But are there no fire suppressants in the hold on aircraft?

Lefty

16,186 posts

203 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
rohrl said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
...gentlemen, you are fking idiots.
And there's that legendary charm of PH's most pointlessly argumentative member once again.
Taken in full context, she has a valid point and, it has to be said, a qualified opinion:

"Now, those Microsoft Flight Sim Qualified Armchair Experts on this thread can chose to believe me (an ex RAF Multi-Engined Pilot and Qualified Flying Instructor), can chose to believe those qualified Airline pilots on this thread such as pushthebutton, el stovey, et al or, alternatively, you can continue to insist you know better about our profession than we do.

In which case, gentlemen, you are fking idiots."

TheJimi

25,046 posts

244 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
I'm with Ginetta on this one.

What you're seeing in GG's post is a manifestation of exasperation.

PositronicRay

27,102 posts

184 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
Lefty said:
rohrl said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
...gentlemen, you are fking idiots.
And there's that legendary charm of PH's most pointlessly argumentative member once again.
Taken in full context, she has a valid point and, it has to be said, a qualified opinion:

"Now, those Microsoft Flight Sim Qualified Armchair Experts on this thread can chose to believe me (an ex RAF Multi-Engined Pilot and Qualified Flying Instructor), can chose to believe those qualified Airline pilots on this thread such as pushthebutton, el stovey, et al or, alternatively, you can continue to insist you know better about our profession than we do.

In which case, gentlemen, you are fking idiots."
clap

HarryW

15,161 posts

270 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
I suppose you could say both camps have opinions; One corner have just that, opinions. The other camp has informed opinions.
One thing you will not be able to reconcile though will be the thought that Allah willed it, the rest is just debate.

98elise

26,784 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd May 2016
quotequote all
TheJimi said:
I'm with Ginetta on this one.

What you're seeing in GG's post is a manifestation of exasperation.
I've only read a few pages back and I can understand why.

Somone qualified explains why something is like it is. Its not their opinion, its rules and procedure based on decades of experience and investigations from the manufacturers, operators and regulators.

Someone else with no qualification or experience argues that they are all wrong!!!!!