Hillary Clintons Health

[Byker28i]

HughiusMaximus said:

Just refuses to accept that she lost the election because she was a candidate who was hard to like who focused too much identity politics and didnt spend enough time on the ground in historic blue states.

by effectively 80,000 votes in 3 crucial states that just happen to have had the electoral roll/voting register hacked, denying some voters the right to vote? By having Comey reveal she was back under investigation for her emails 10 days before the election, yet not mentioning that trump was even then under investigation for russian interference/collusion.

[RumbleOfThunder]

Remember when the Democratic party rigged their leadership elections to install that crooked, haggard nightmare as the candidate? Mental.

[amusingduck]

RumbleOfThunder said:

Remember when the Democratic party rigged their leadership elections to install that crooked, haggard nightmare as the candidate? Mental.

It was Her Turn though

[smn159]

Predictable series of ad-homs from the usual zealots.

She does have a point about Johnson not publishing that report though - what could he possibly want to hide?

[Countdown]

RumbleOfThunder said:

Remember when the Democratic party rigged their leadership elections to install that crooked, haggard nightmare as the candidate? Mental.

They chose the most sensible candidate they had. Bernie was basically a Jewish Jeremy Corbyn

Out of interest why is she "crooked", "haggard", or a "nightmare"?

[Digga]

Countdown said:

RumbleOfThunder said:

Remember when the Democratic party rigged their leadership elections to install that crooked, haggard nightmare as the candidate? Mental.

They chose the most sensible candidate they had. Bernie was basically a Jewish Jeremy Corbyn

Out of interest why is she "crooked", "haggard", or a "nightmare"?

Well.. marrying an adulterous and publicly disgraced husband can do that to a woman, no matter what she has personally achieved in her life.

[JagLover]

Countdown said:

They chose the most sensible candidate they had. Bernie was basically a Jewish Jeremy Corbyn

Out of interest why is she "crooked", "haggard", or a "nightmare"?

Bernie might be a bit too left wing for American voters but he seems a decent enough sort, so not sure why you are lumping him in with a creature like Corbyn.

[hidetheelephants]

smn159 said:

Lotobear said:

...as yet unproven Ruskie interference in UK politics....mmmmm

If only there were some sort of report available to clarify this

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

[smn159]

hidetheelephants said:

smn159 said:

Lotobear said:

...as yet unproven Ruskie interference in UK politics....mmmmm

If only there were some sort of report available to clarify this

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

Who says they can't release it?

[turbobloke]

smn159 said:

hidetheelephants said:

smn159 said:

Lotobear said:

...as yet unproven Ruskie interference in UK politics....mmmmm

If only there were some sort of report available to clarify this

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

Who says they can't release it?

Not Kevin Bacon.

[hidetheelephants]

smn159 said:

hidetheelephants said:

smn159 said:

Lotobear said:

...as yet unproven Ruskie interference in UK politics....mmmmm

If only there were some sort of report available to clarify this

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

Who says they can't release it?

wiki said:

Purdah (/ˈpɜːrdə/) is the pre-election period in the United Kingdom, specifically the time between the announcement of an election and the formation of the new elected government. It affects civil servants, who must be politically impartial,[1] preventing central and local government from making announcements about any new or controversial government initiatives (such as modernisation initiatives or administrative and legislative changes) that could be seen to be advantageous to any candidates or parties in the forthcoming election. Purdah does not apply to candidates for political office. Where a court determines that actual advantage has been given to a candidate, this may amount to a breach of Section 2 of the Local Government Act 1986.

[p1stonhead]

smn159 said:

hidetheelephants said:

smn159 said:

Lotobear said:

...as yet unproven Ruskie interference in UK politics....mmmmm

If only there were some sort of report available to clarify this

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

Who says they can't release it?

The government I expect

[paulguitar]

Pesty said:

I’m predicting three suicides

Nice knowing you, we will remember.

?

[bitchstewie]

hidetheelephants said:

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

I think if it was purdah they would, when asked, have said so.

All I've heard is "mumble mumble mumble" when ministers or anyone in Government were asked.

Nobody seems to have a particularly good reason why it wasn't released before the break up of Parliament.

[p1stonhead]

bhstewie said:

hidetheelephants said:

Yes, there is a report but the government cannot release it in election purdah. This is basic stuff.

I think if it was purdah they would, when asked, have said so.

All I've heard is "mumble mumble mumble" when ministers or anyone in Government were asked.

Nobody seems to have a particularly good reason why it wasn't released before the break up of Parliament.

Your honour I object!

Why?

Because it’s devastating to my case election!

Edited by p1stonhead on Tuesday 12th November 18:44

[anonymous-user]

Trump will win again, the Dems haven't learnt a damn thing in the last 4 years.

[paulguitar]

jsf said:

Trump will win again, the Dems haven't learnt a damn thing in the last 4 years.

We don't even know who is going to be the nominee yet.

[vaud]

jsf said:

Trump will win again, the Dems haven't learnt a damn thing in the last 4 years.

Inclined to agree. Too old or too left wing or both. No "hope" candidate. Bloomberg MIGHT be a rally point but I am skeptical.

[bitchstewie]

Said on other threads, there's some weird st going on in the USA when all the candidates seem to be so old.

Their entire political system seems based on septuagenarians.

It's weird.

[Pesty]

jsf said:

Trump will win again, the Dems haven't learnt a damn thing in the last 4 years.

Oh they have. Illegals are being given driving licences left right and center the faithful will be voting for their dead great grandmothers etc.

Trumps biggest mistake was not bringing in voter ID