Home Secretary greenlights police to use new Taser 'within w
Discussion
Borroxs said:
alfie2244 said:
IMO they seemed unable to control & take charge of the situation and lacked the stature / skills / confidence in their own abilities hence they took the easy option and tasered him.
The male copper does look oddly 'sheepish/clueless' doesn't he? When I was a fair bit younger, I was stopped by the police, very politely, just for driving my own car - a Range Rover at the time, since we're on PH. I was quite happy to give ID and the officer was almost apologetic, but I said (and genuinely meant it) that I'd rather they pull me over and make sure my car isn't stolen than allow it to be. Sometimes, people lose sight of the fact the police are just doing their job and sometimes you might be able to help by not wasting their time.
Murph7355 said:
SystemParanoia said:
Looks like the people will have to defend themselves against the oppressors....
You've been watching too much TV. "Oppressors" my arse. People with your attitude are the reason why the police end up with tasers in the first place. If people could wind their necks in a bit more, perhaps things like this wouldn't happen.
I believe in "Innocent until proven guilty"
I believe in being able to freely go about my business without risk of being tasers and assaulted just because i dont want to give my name
I believe that when the police get it wrong, the officers involve should face the courts, should be named and should have their faces put on public record.
SystemParanoia said:
a ) I have not witnessed a crime, and i cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that this is who i'm after.
everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
Exactly how do you establish the bloke isn't the one wanted if he is evasive and tries to depart?everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
You are coming across as very free man on the land.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4139478/Po...
I thought when using force police were supposed to weigh up the risks of violenece and escape?
Another of the world's finest police officers that graduated the Cartman School of Policing.
Hazel is more of a Land Whale than a Land Shark?
I thought when using force police were supposed to weigh up the risks of violenece and escape?
Another of the world's finest police officers that graduated the Cartman School of Policing.
Hazel is more of a Land Whale than a Land Shark?
eldar said:
SystemParanoia said:
a ) I have not witnessed a crime, and i cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that this is who i'm after.
everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
Exactly how do you establish the bloke isn't the one wanted if he is evasive and tries to depart?everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
You are coming across as very free man on the land.
Digga said:
Borroxs said:
alfie2244 said:
IMO they seemed unable to control & take charge of the situation and lacked the stature / skills / confidence in their own abilities hence they took the easy option and tasered him.
The male copper does look oddly 'sheepish/clueless' doesn't he? When I was a fair bit younger, I was stopped by the police, very politely, just for driving my own car - a Range Rover at the time, since we're on PH. I was quite happy to give ID and the officer was almost apologetic, but I said (and genuinely meant it) that I'd rather they pull me over and make sure my car isn't stolen than allow it to be. Sometimes, people lose sight of the fact the police are just doing their job and sometimes you might be able to help by not wasting their time.
They just didn't seem, to me, to be very confident in their own skins as police officers
Hypothetical I know but could they not have asked the neighbour(guy filming) do you know who this man is?
SystemParanoia said:
of course not, ill just shoot him in the fking face because.. you know why not
I really don't know how to get through to you, you seem to demand that you are treated as though you live in some liberal utopia with rainbows and childrens smiles beaming from every street corner.The police ultimately are just like you and I, treat them with respect and appreciation for their job and you will be treated the same. Adopt a tumblrina victim mentality and stamp your feet when someone in a uniform has the audacity to ask who you are and you are going to be met with suspicion at a bare minimum because guess what......all the 'real' criminals will act up protesting their innocence and stating their 'rights' in exactly the same way.
SystemParanoia said:
...my "Attitude" ?
...
The way you post on here (this thread and others) suggests you have more chip than Harry Ramsden....
If you're even 10% like that in real life I would not bet against you getting tasered at some point!
SystemParanoia said:
I believe in "Innocent until proven guilty"
....
Totally agree with you. Though we have to let our police do their job and if they suspect you of doing something (or being someone who has), then comply with their requests.....
SystemParanoia said:
I believe in being able to freely go about my business without risk of being tasers and assaulted just because i dont want to give my name
...
Now the grey comes in....there was no risk of being tasered/assaulted, until he got chippy/physical. What possible harm is there in answering the questions of a policeman?...
Not long after I passed my test I was stopped regularly by the police. I could kind of understand why (it was often when driving late at night with a car full of friends - driving was preferred to drinking for a short amount of time), but either way I saw no issue in answering questions. Even blowing in the bag. I knew I'd done nothing wrong, but 5mins being compliant and proving it seemed a minor inconvenience.
My guess is, from the way you post, that you'd have gone all gangsta and started bleating about your rights...
SystemParanoia said:
...
I believe that when the police get it wrong, the officers involve should face the courts, should be named and should have their faces put on public record.
Totally agree with you. I believe that when the police get it wrong, the officers involve should face the courts, should be named and should have their faces put on public record.
I'm not convinced they did anything fundamentally wrong here. Maybe the policewoman didn't use the taser properly...I don't know. Maybe there was preamble that would prove it was the police that unnecessarily escalated the situation. I don't know. But from what was on that video I wouldn't be punishing them.
Approaching people in the streets as they have to these days is not something I would relish. And I think we all need to be careful using too much hindsight when being judgemental.
SystemParanoia said:
eldar said:
SystemParanoia said:
a ) I have not witnessed a crime, and i cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that this is who i'm after.
everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
Exactly how do you establish the bloke isn't the one wanted if he is evasive and tries to depart?everyone walks away alive and un-assulted
You are coming across as very free man on the land.
I happened to see a man who fitted the description of Mr X ( the wanted Puppy Kicker )on Nickem St this morning,
However when I asked his name he refused to tell me so I let him go,
I hope this helps with your investigation. "
pinchmeimdreamin said:
"Helo mr Detective just a quick note,
I happened to see a man who fitted the description of Mr X ( the wanted Puppy Kicker )on Nickem St this morning,
However when I asked his name he refused to tell me so I let him go,
I hope this helps with your investigation. "
Job done, its now the detectives problemI happened to see a man who fitted the description of Mr X ( the wanted Puppy Kicker )on Nickem St this morning,
However when I asked his name he refused to tell me so I let him go,
I hope this helps with your investigation. "
pinchmeimdreamin said:
carinaman said:
They risked blinding someone for refusing to give his name, when he wasn't required to?
What happened during the missing bit of the Video ?SystemParanoia said:
Job done, its now the detectives problem
Two months later at an IPCC hearing.......IPCC investigator to PC Dobbin........as you know PC Dobbin the gentleman who you let walk away after refusing to give you his name subsequently went up into his flat and murdered his wife and her pet tortoise with a knife he had just stolen from the local Ikea. The theft from Ikea was reported along with a description of the individual which was why you stopped the gentleman originally was it not?
PC Dobbin....yes, that is correct, according to the 2017 System Paranoia Free Man on the Land ACT I couldn't detain him once he said 'No, I've done nuffink'. I duly passed a hand written note to CID to investigate further.
IPCC investigator......quite right, quite right, good job Dobbin. We can't afford to see people's rights trampled! The complaint from the wife's family is dismissed, in fact I think we should actually discipline PC Dobbin here for angering the gentleman by asking such impertinent questions and clearly causing his wife's untimely demise.
Grunt Futtock said:
SystemParanoia said:
Job done, its now the detectives problem
Two months later at an IPCC hearing.......IPCC investigator to PC Dobbin........as you know PC Dobbin the gentleman who you let walk away after refusing to give you his name subsequently went up into his flat and murdered his wife and her pet tortoise with a knife he had just stolen from the local Ikea. The theft from Ikea was reported along with a description of the individual which was why you stopped the gentleman originally was it not?
PC Dobbin....yes, that is correct, according to the 2017 System Paranoia Free Man on the Land ACT I couldn't detain him once he said 'No, I've done nuffink'. I duly passed a hand written note to CID to investigate further.
IPCC investigator......quite right, quite right, good job Dobbin. We can't afford to see people's rights trampled! The complaint from the wife's family is dismissed, in fact I think we should actually discipline PC Dobbin here for angering the gentleman by asking such impertinent questions and clearly causing his wife's untimely demise.
not leave it to the green horn plodding around the screets in uniform
SystemParanoia said:
Grunt Futtock said:
SystemParanoia said:
Job done, its now the detectives problem
Two months later at an IPCC hearing.......IPCC investigator to PC Dobbin........as you know PC Dobbin the gentleman who you let walk away after refusing to give you his name subsequently went up into his flat and murdered his wife and her pet tortoise with a knife he had just stolen from the local Ikea. The theft from Ikea was reported along with a description of the individual which was why you stopped the gentleman originally was it not?
PC Dobbin....yes, that is correct, according to the 2017 System Paranoia Free Man on the Land ACT I couldn't detain him once he said 'No, I've done nuffink'. I duly passed a hand written note to CID to investigate further.
IPCC investigator......quite right, quite right, good job Dobbin. We can't afford to see people's rights trampled! The complaint from the wife's family is dismissed, in fact I think we should actually discipline PC Dobbin here for angering the gentleman by asking such impertinent questions and clearly causing his wife's untimely demise.
not leave it to the green horn plodding around the screets in uniform
Koofler said:
Jesus Christ. You're a fking idiot. What planet do you live on? You sound like an utterly cowardly turd on every thread you pop up on.
Cowardly ? how so, im openly voicing how i feel about situations as i see them.You seem to expect me to "go with the crowd" and cheer the police on no matter what because "their job is hard"... Doing THAT would be cowardly, and helps nobody.
Ill give praise where praise is due
ill make my voice heard when I see wrong in their actions
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff