What porno was Jacqui's hubby watching?
Discussion
CedGTV said:
To be fair, if I were married to that ditch donkey, then I'd have to be knocking one out rather than making the beast with two backs with her.
What's the betting on my front door being kicked in by Special Branch at 3am tomorrow then ?
NO BACK or front doors were smashed in last night, thank God.What's the betting on my front door being kicked in by Special Branch at 3am tomorrow then ?
aclivity said:
Maldini35 said:
Sorry if I'm late on this but does anybody know the exact films he watched?
Would love to know if it was a 'specialist' title.
The Video on Demand available on Virgin Media is 18 rated content only, the broadcasting rules do not allow for 18R content to be played on demand. There was talk about rules being relaxed to allow it (so the on demand system copes with two PINs, for example) but nothing was done, that was about 3 years ago now.Would love to know if it was a 'specialist' title.
So nothing too "specialist" is available, I'm afraid.
©The late great W. Hicks esq.
zooooom said:
It was being discussed on a day time tv show this morning.
So it's simply an allegation, that they have worked out by looking at the schedules, and seeing what was on at the time. The whole point of "on demand" is that it starts when you want it to, there are no schedules.
"Knowing" is a strong word, suspecting is more accurate.
aclivity said:
zooooom said:
It was being discussed on a day time tv show this morning.
So it's simply an allegation, that they have worked out by looking at the schedules, and seeing what was on at the time. The whole point of "on demand" is that it starts when you want it to, there are no schedules.
"Knowing" is a strong word, suspecting is more accurate.
I am not saying she is wrong, the system is wrong to allow such things to be claimed in the first place, lets face it, if you could claim someghing back from your employer, even a daily paper, I am sure most would.
Vipers said:
I am not saying she is wrong, the system is wrong to allow such things to be claimed in the first place, lets face it, if you could claim someghing back from your employer, even a daily paper, I am sure most would.
Well you should be (saying she is wrong). Her husband may hace watched his jazz movies, but she submitted the dodgy expenses claim. She is required to vet her claims before submission. She made a dodgy claim in contravention of the rules - either she failed to vet, or saw it and stuck it in anyway. Either way, she is wrong.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff