Tax Avoidance = Immoral

Author
Discussion

turbobloke

104,434 posts

262 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
turbobloke said:
What Labour did, in summary, was to screw up the country at such a great price that our children will be paying for years.
Nothing like some biased hyperbole is there?
No, whereas my post is simply reality.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/reality-check-w...


martin84

5,366 posts

155 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
Well you're a cheery soul aren't you?

turbobloke

104,434 posts

262 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
Well you're a cheery soul aren't you?
Sure.

We were indeed poorly placed to weather the storm when it blew in. Our children will for sure be paying.

Bliar and Clown arranged it, The Guardian reported on it, I linked to it.

Reasons to be cheerful smile

Steffan

10,362 posts

230 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
turbobloke said:
What Labour did, in summary, was to screw up the country at such a great price that our children will be paying for years.
Nothing like some biased hyperbole is there?
Without being drawn into a haranguing match, may I respectfully ask a question.

Do you accept that the New Labour administrations from 1997 till the caolition took over, committed to a level of government spending and therefore borrowing, that was well beyond the actual level that the UK economy could actually afford or support from taxation receipts alone?

My own view is that they clearly did: that the consequences are very significant debts that will take years and years to repay, and that during those many years, they will cost the UK huge sums in interest paid on the loans.

My view is that this tendency of modern politicians to spend more than the country can earn, or generate in taxation receipts, is the prime reason why so many countries across the financial world are in such difficulty.

Clearly you have views. I am interested to understand the method behind the approach.

johnfm

13,668 posts

252 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
Steffan said:
I actually agree with you on this the Laffer curve is the key. There is undoubtedly a diminishing return when taxation is perceived to be excessive by the taxpayer.
General school of thought is that curve - in regards to the top rate of income tax - is about 40%. Gordon Brown delivered 11 budgets to the house of commons and in none of them did he bring in a higher top rate of income tax because even he knew that was the level where you get the most out of the rich.
That would be great if the 40% was the only tax.

sadly, it is merely the headline rate income tax. There is NI to pay, SDLT when you buy a house, VAT of 20% on most consumption, duties on fuel and alcohol, road tax, import taxes...

I cannot for the life of me figure out why there is an incentive to minimise one's tax burden...


..especially when it is used so well for education, policing, health and translating pointless documents into 30 obscure languages...

Steffan

10,362 posts

230 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
coyft said:
In that case who is immoral? The tax avoider or the politicians for enslaving future taxpayers?
Both. Politicians enslave the taxpayer by spending and borrowing mire than the taxpayer can afford, in the taxpayers name. Tax avoider's seek to avoid taxes, by using devices and artificial mechanisms, that do not for m=part of an underlying business transaction, that are therefore dropped onto the shoulders of all the other taxpayers, who again pick up the tab.

Of the two Politicians are far more dangerous. Both are wrong

turbobloke

104,434 posts

262 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
coyft said:
Steffan said:
coyft said:
In that case who is immoral? The tax avoider or the politicians for enslaving future taxpayers?
Both. Politicians enslave the taxpayer by spending and borrowing mire than the taxpayer can afford, in the taxpayers name. Tax avoider's seek to avoid taxes, by using devices and artificial mechanisms, that do not for m=part of an underlying business transaction, that are therefore dropped onto the shoulders of all the other taxpayers, who again pick up the tab.

Of the two Politicians are far more dangerous. Both are wrong
Given that Politicians will use tax payers money for immoral purposes and our tax system is soley about compliance, why is it the duty of a citizen to consider morality when calculating their tax return?

Politicians could introduce a top rate of tax of 90%, morally I may not agree with it, but I would be obliged to comply with it.

In my opinion a citizens duty is to ensure that they comply with the law and pay the correct amount of tax.
Agreed, the notion of paying more tax than you have to as morally superior or even desirable is simplistic collectivist twaddle. I've yet to read a substantiated account of voluntary additional monies being handed over by a tax-me-more-and-vip-me-harder-Brunhilde masochist. A USA state apparently set up a scheme where this can be done and allegedly a thousand dollars extra was received but there was no clue as to whether the chief tax collector had set an example wink

Paying a penny more tax than you have to is silly not savvy.

Shay HTFC

3,588 posts

191 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Agreed, the notion of paying more tax than you have to as morally superior or even desirable is simplistic collectivist twaddle. I've yet to read a substantiated account of voluntary additional monies being handed over by a tax-me-more-and-vip-me-harder-Brunhilde masochist. A USA state apparently set up a scheme where this can be done and allegedly a thousand dollars extra was received but there was no clue as to whether the chief tax collector had set an example wink

Paying a penny more tax than you have to is silly not savvy.
Thats true, but there comes a point where you know you are taking advantage of various loopholes and going against social 'etiquette' for lack of a better word.
Don't get me wrong, if I had the choice of using K2 then I would probably use it, but I wouldn't have a moral leg to stand on if I got found out by the general public... thats just life.

Its like queue jumping. There's no law against it, but don't be surprised when people get miffed at you doing it.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

206 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
"There is no such thing as the 'spirit of the rules', only 'the rules'."

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Saturday 23rd June 2012
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
"There is no such thing as the 'spirit of the rules', only 'the rules'."
Quite. Of course the reason why our politicians have not closed all the dodgy Jersey loopholes is because they and their mates are themselves enjoying all the Jersey loopholes.

The whole existence of Jersey, Isle Of Man etc under the umbrella of UK military protection etc is completely inexcusable.

It's a sad fact we have to rely on the Americans clamping down on tax havens to achieve anything at all. Meanwhile there are still plenty of places for dodgy Russians, dodgy Arabs and dodgy Africans to hide their money - in the sense of "hide in full view". Switzerland? I wouldn't cross the road for it.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
It's a sad fact we have to rely on the Americans clamping down on tax havens to achieve anything at all.
seriously? delaware llc. tax free, no kyc or aml, no reporting, legally protected ownership secrecy, 100 miles from NY. costs about 250 quid. you take away tax competition guess what that leaves the politicians to do...

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/55991000/gif...


Edited by fbrs on Sunday 24th June 04:47

Eric Mc

122,294 posts

267 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I think he meant to say "That leaves the Americans to clamp down on everybody elses's tax havens".

Murph7355

37,879 posts

258 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I think he meant to say "That leaves the Americans to clamp down on everybody elses's tax havens".
Exactly.

People moan about a comedian's "hypocrisy", we moan about the "morality" of tax avoidance. These things are small beer in the overall scheme of things and only serve to deflect attention from where it should be. Your average man in the street is so easily distracted it's untrue.

Let the leaders of these countries lead by example and sort their own houses out first. Then maybe people will listen to them. Stop profligate waste on what the money is spent on, and then maybe there (a) won't be as much need for such punitive taxation and (b) would be less people inclined to take measures to avoid.

Eric Mc

122,294 posts

267 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I'm beginning to feel sorry for Carr now.

Sort the tax law out.

NorthernBoy

12,642 posts

259 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Are you a genuine "low earner" or have you overlooked,

  • VAT 20% (paid out of taxed income)
  • Council Tax (paid out of taxed income)
  • Stamp Duty (paid out of taxed income)
  • Fuel duty (paid out of taxed income and itself subject to VAT)
  • Airport tax (paid out of taxed income)
I'd wager the government takes at least two thirds of a high earner's income these days.

  • Oh, I forgot the 40% Inheritance Tax payable at the end, if you've got anything left....
52% marginal rate on income.

mercGLowner

1,668 posts

186 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Not sure if this has been mentioned before in this thread, but one of the actions I would take if I were Osborne, would be that EVERYONE who is on the public payroll should be on PAYE. That should include the BBC, quangos and anyone who is paid out of public coffers. There should be absolutely no exclusions from this; no BBC news presenters being paid into a private company account, no dodgy CEs of Quangos being paid gross into their dodgy company accounts.

This may not solve the whole issue of immoral tax avoidance, but at least the public sector would be setting an example.

Steffan

10,362 posts

230 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
The BBC are suggesting Carr has improved his ratings see:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-18569...

No such thing as bad publicity.

TTmonkey

20,911 posts

249 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
There would be no immoral tax avoidance if it wasn't for those evil accountants....

They're all immoral tax avoiding mosters. I blame eric.

AstonZagato

12,777 posts

212 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
NorthernBoy said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
Are you a genuine "low earner" or have you overlooked,

  • VAT 20% (paid out of taxed income)
  • Council Tax (paid out of taxed income)
  • Stamp Duty (paid out of taxed income)
  • Fuel duty (paid out of taxed income and itself subject to VAT)
  • Airport tax (paid out of taxed income)
I'd wager the government takes at least two thirds of a high earner's income these days.

  • Oh, I forgot the 40% Inheritance Tax payable at the end, if you've got anything left....
52% marginal rate on income.
The effective tax rate at £100k is 62% (40% plus loss of personal allowance plus NI)

Eric Mc

122,294 posts

267 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
TTmonkey said:
There would be no immoral tax avoidance if it wasn't for those evil accountants....

They're all immoral tax avoiding mosters. I blame eric.
I hope you've been reading my posts.