Can Sir Keir Starmer revive the Labour Party? (Vol. 2)
Discussion
bhstewie said:
AmyRichardson said:
Read that early this AM; I can feel for Starmer, he must want to shake these people whilst shouting "2019! 2019!! Is your memory that f*&£ing short!"
Pretty much this.That said the last time I saw a union jack it was hung from a bridge over a dual carriageway with "Britain First" written all over it.
I think it's a reasonable article if you look past the headline and read and think about some of the points made.
S600BSB said:
Wombat3 said:
Doesn't tell you anything that we didn't already know about large chunks of the Labour movement. Nothing new to see either & why is anyone surprised by this?
As always people have short memories, but Leopards don't change their spots.
You certainly seem the type to have a flag in your garden Wombat. As always people have short memories, but Leopards don't change their spots.
119 said:
bhstewie said:
AmyRichardson said:
Read that early this AM; I can feel for Starmer, he must want to shake these people whilst shouting "2019! 2019!! Is your memory that f*&£ing short!"
Pretty much this.That said the last time I saw a union jack it was hung from a bridge over a dual carriageway with "Britain First" written all over it.
I think it's a reasonable article if you look past the headline and read and think about some of the points made.
119 said:
bhstewie said:
AmyRichardson said:
Read that early this AM; I can feel for Starmer, he must want to shake these people whilst shouting "2019! 2019!! Is your memory that f*&£ing short!"
Pretty much this.That said the last time I saw a union jack it was hung from a bridge over a dual carriageway with "Britain First" written all over it.
I think it's a reasonable article if you look past the headline and read and think about some of the points made.
borcy said:
119 said:
bhstewie said:
AmyRichardson said:
Read that early this AM; I can feel for Starmer, he must want to shake these people whilst shouting "2019! 2019!! Is your memory that f*&£ing short!"
Pretty much this.That said the last time I saw a union jack it was hung from a bridge over a dual carriageway with "Britain First" written all over it.
I think it's a reasonable article if you look past the headline and read and think about some of the points made.
Wombat3 said:
borcy said:
119 said:
bhstewie said:
AmyRichardson said:
Read that early this AM; I can feel for Starmer, he must want to shake these people whilst shouting "2019! 2019!! Is your memory that f*&£ing short!"
Pretty much this.That said the last time I saw a union jack it was hung from a bridge over a dual carriageway with "Britain First" written all over it.
I think it's a reasonable article if you look past the headline and read and think about some of the points made.
119 said:
It’s interesting in a way as there are many BAME people are British but may not neccessarily accept the flag.
I'm not sure it's a case of not accepting it so much as whether it's a priority for them.I've no problem at all with our flag but I'm more concerned with who's going to fix NHS waiting lists than I am with whose leaflet has the most red white and blue on it.
I don't quite get the obsession with flags if I'm honest.
768 said:
The argument that Labour's anti-union flag sentiment is anti all flags doesn't wash. They're obsessed with flags if it's the right one.
Is anyone suggesting Labour is anti Union flag or anti all flags? It seems some people don't like the Union Flag. Starmer, and I can't abide him, spoke quite passionately about the English flag through the week didn't he? It's this kind of sweeping generalisation that is so indicative of the binary positions many seem desperate to cling to these days.
bhstewie said:
There was a point where every single time you'd see a Conservative MP or Minister on TV they'd have a union jack flag behind them.
I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
You mean supporting the nation you reside in? Why wouldn’t you? I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
carlo996 said:
bhstewie said:
There was a point where every single time you'd see a Conservative MP or Minister on TV they'd have a union jack flag behind them.
I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
You mean supporting the nation you reside in? Why wouldn’t you? I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
Personally I'd much rather support a party that embodied what I see as British values and wanted to do what I think would make Britain a better place to live and a place to be proud of and had zero Union Jack imagery rather than support one that plastered and draped itself in the red white and blue while pissing all over our supposed values and institutions and apparently aiming to make the nation more tawdry, ramshackle, venal and unpleasant.
As a Labour MP quoted in the article put it "You don’t need to prove your patriotism by wrapping yourself in the Union Jack."
No one mentioned in the article is recoiling from the Jack on sight like vampires before garlic. No one is quoted as saying anything dismissive about it or its general symbolism.
All the article raises is questions of branding - that the leaflets it looks too much like Conservative material and don't have impactful Labour imagery that is usually associated with the Party (red colour, rose symbol) and that certain demographics are mostly familiar with Union Jack-themed pamphlets coming through their letterboxes or bring thrust at them on street corners as being from the BNP or BF, not the Labour Party.
Given the Union Jack's history I'm sure there are some Labour members and voters who consider it a 'butcher's apron'. In fact I know there are because I've met them. But that's not what is being discussed in the article.
Edited by 2xChevrons on Saturday 30th March 12:52
carlo996 said:
bhstewie said:
There was a point where every single time you'd see a Conservative MP or Minister on TV they'd have a union jack flag behind them.
I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
You mean supporting the nation you reside in? Why wouldn’t you? I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
2xChevrons said:
carlo996 said:
bhstewie said:
There was a point where every single time you'd see a Conservative MP or Minister on TV they'd have a union jack flag behind them.
I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
You mean supporting the nation you reside in? Why wouldn’t you? I think Starmer is trying to appeal to the people who consider that kind of thing important.
As a Labour MP quoted in the article put it "You don’t need to prove your patriotism by wrapping yourself in the Union Jack."
No one mentioned in the article is recoiling from the Jack on sight like vampires before garlic. No one is quoted as saying anything dismissive about it or its general symbolism.
All the article raises is questions of branding - that the leaflets it looks too much like Conservative material and don't have impactful Labour imagery that is usually associated with the Party (red colour, rose symbol) and that certain demographics are mostly familiar with Union Jack-themed pamphlets coming through their letterboxes or bring thrust at them on street corners as being from the BNP or BF, not the Labour Party.
Given the Union Jack's history I'm sure there are some Labour members and voters who consider it a 'butcher's apron'. In fact I know there are because I've met them. But that's not what is being discussed in the article.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff