Interest rates going up soon...

Interest rates going up soon...

Author
Discussion

Zoon

6,727 posts

123 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
Anyone can do it,
If they have the required funding for the massive BTL deposits required nowadays.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

160 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Zoon said:
If they have the required funding for the massive BTL deposits required nowadays.
The trick for that was to work hard at school/uni, get a good job and stash some money whilst others were peeing it up against a wall.

There are other decent investments- I merely mentioned the one I have most experience of. The fact remains that 5% returns are available but won't just fall into someone's lap.

Atomic12C

5,180 posts

219 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Bankers are bad.... but there was another reason why 2008 financial crisis happened.

The Fed in the USA could be said to be at blame for its hike in interest rates between 2004 and 2007.


barryrs

4,415 posts

225 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Round my way you can still buy a fairly modern 2 bedroom flat for £95k that will rent for £550 per month equating to a 6.95% yield with a initial £20k cash investment.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

160 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
barryrs said:
Round my way you can still buy a fairly modern 2 bedroom flat for £95k that will rent for £550 per month equating to a 6.95% yield with a initial £20k cash investment.
Get away with your facts and figures- this is about how 'real' people are being shafted for not getting that amount for just sticking it in the bank.

Zoon

6,727 posts

123 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
The trick for that was to work hard at school/uni, get a good job and stash some money whilst others were peeing it up against a wall.

There are other decent investments- I merely mentioned the one I have most experience of. The fact remains that 5% returns are available but won't just fall into someone's lap.
All of which I did and set my own company up and own a number of properties.
But to say anyone can do it clearly isn't the case, if they aren't bright enough, can't go back to uni and haven't stashed money.

5% is easily achievable without property though.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

160 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Zoon said:
But to say anyone can do it clearly isn't the case, if they aren't bright enough, can't go back to uni and haven't stashed money.
Not BTL, perhaps, but there are other options.

Zoon said:
5% is easily achievable without property though.
Exactly. Everyone has to find what works for them.

I was on a course once; at 'any questions' somebody asked what percentage would pass the course. The answer was "all those who REALLY want to." Words to live by.

Murph7355

37,858 posts

258 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Ari said:
I'm going to make a wild stab in the dark that these were not recent investments?

I think I'll pass on the property market right now... smile
I think you've just confirmed what he was referring to.

You are concerned about the risks associated with the property market and so are passing up on the option he described. Which is fair enough, but doesn't change what he noted (ie that you have to be less risk averse than sticking it in the Bradford and Bingley).

Equally you may not have the downpayment to enter that game, which does dink his "anyone can" argument to a point smile

As another example, I believe Funding Circle can give returns in excess of 5% (after taxes). Again, you have to accept a greater degree of risk. But it's there. And this time the entry requirements aren't so high.

There are other avenues I'm sure, each with their own pros and cons. This is where the other part of RovingHawk's comment comes in - working a bit harder for it. This doesn't (just) mean logging onto your preferred social media site and asking for tips smile

tannhauser

1,773 posts

217 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Ari said:
ClaphamGT3 said:
If you want to get a 5% return on your capital, you can perfectly easily get it; you just have to be less lazy and less risk averse than sticking it in the building society
Yay, the mythical 'perfectly easy' Pistonheads 5% return on capital has appeared yet again! thumbup

No one's ever able to describe where to achieve this 'perfectly easy' 5%, but that never seems to stop it being bandied about in Internet arguments. smile
This completely. Typical of the usual, detached-from-this-world ste that is spouted on here daily. And as for his story about paying a teenager £100 to (not) look after a hamster! rolleyes

This comment "profoundly irritated" me:

ClaphamGT3 said:
What profoundly irritates me about arguments like this is the implication that savers should be rewarded without taking risk.
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?


Edited by tannhauser on Monday 6th November 16:20

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

160 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Equally you may not have the downpayment to enter that game, which does dink his "anyone can" argument to a point smile
I'll concede that, albeit with a comment that there are other options for making a few quid from investments for those with a smaller stake.

barryrs

4,415 posts

225 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?


Edited by tannhauser on Monday 6th November 16:20
With banks getting net interest margins of circa 3% why should savers by offered much or a return?

ETA

If not already covered Nationwide offer 5% for the first 12 months on a Flexdirect account on balances of up to £2500



Edited by barryrs on Monday 6th November 16:45

egor110

16,932 posts

205 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
Ari said:
ClaphamGT3 said:
If you want to get a 5% return on your capital, you can perfectly easily get it; you just have to be less lazy and less risk averse than sticking it in the building society
Yay, the mythical 'perfectly easy' Pistonheads 5% return on capital has appeared yet again! thumbup

No one's ever able to describe where to achieve this 'perfectly easy' 5%, but that never seems to stop it being bandied about in Internet arguments. smile
This completely. Typical of the usual, detached-from-this-world ste that is spouted on here daily. And as for his story about paying a teenager £100 to (not) look after a hamster! rolleyes

This comment "profoundly irritated" me:

ClaphamGT3 said:
What profoundly irritates me about arguments like this is the implication that savers should be rewarded without taking risk.
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?


Edited by tannhauser on Monday 6th November 16:20
You have to be less lazy and less risk adverse - so much like getting a girl to look after your hamster because she was cheap , then not moaning when you find she's lost the hamster because that's the risk you take by going cheap.

s2art

18,939 posts

255 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Ari said:
Rovinghawk said:
There are many other ways to make a return on investment. The fact remains that if one wishes to make a decent return on savings it is possible but requires a little work & a little risk.
You can't expect to get decent returns for no work & no risk.
Cool, do go on? (Other than going back in time and buying property). smile
I think both Shell and BP shares offer better than 5% yield and there are others. Start an ISA.

Murph7355

37,858 posts

258 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
This completely. Typical of the usual, detached-from-this-world ste that is spouted on here daily. And as for his story about paying a teenager £100 to (not) look after a hamster! rolleyes

This comment "profoundly irritated" me:

ClaphamGT3 said:
What profoundly irritates me about arguments like this is the implication that savers should be rewarded without taking risk.
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?
Out of interest, what moves have you made to see how you could better invest your money?

There is nothing wrong with wanting a return from banks. That is not what was being said. Just don't expect large %ages unless you take some risk.

tannhauser

1,773 posts

217 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
barryrs said:
tannhauser said:
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?


Edited by tannhauser on Monday 6th November 16:20
With banks getting net interest margins of circa 3% why should savers by offered much or a return?

ETA

If not already covered Nationwide offer 5% for the first 12 months on a Flexdirect account on balances of up to £2500



Edited by barryrs on Monday 6th November 16:45
3% is infinitely more that the 0% typically on offer!

5% is fantastic, but on 2.5k - wow, that's generous!

tannhauser

1,773 posts

217 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
s2art said:
Ari said:
Rovinghawk said:
There are many other ways to make a return on investment. The fact remains that if one wishes to make a decent return on savings it is possible but requires a little work & a little risk.
You can't expect to get decent returns for no work & no risk.
Cool, do go on? (Other than going back in time and buying property). smile
I think both Shell and BP shares offer better than 5% yield and there are others. Start an ISA.
But shares have risk. ISAs are a waste of time nowadays.

barryrs

4,415 posts

225 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
3% is infinitely more that the 0% typically on offer!

5% is fantastic, but on 2.5k - wow, that's generous!
The post office are offering around 1.5% IIRC for doing nothing!

Considering the average amount held in savings by UK families is just over £3k id say its pretty fair.

tannhauser

1,773 posts

217 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
tannhauser said:
This completely. Typical of the usual, detached-from-this-world ste that is spouted on here daily. And as for his story about paying a teenager £100 to (not) look after a hamster! rolleyes

This comment "profoundly irritated" me:

ClaphamGT3 said:
What profoundly irritates me about arguments like this is the implication that savers should be rewarded without taking risk.
What is wrong with expecting some semblance of a return from a bank that is making money from your money?
Out of interest, what moves have you made to see how you could better invest your money?

There is nothing wrong with wanting a return from banks. That is not what was being said. Just don't expect large %ages unless you take some risk.
I'm rather risk averse and don't have the time to make an informed decision to calculate any risky moves. I therefore accept the returns are going to be limited - but right now in a general sense, they are disgusting and bordering on obscene.

FYI I fanny about with a number of bank accounts, moving money around, paying it in etc. Make maybe 1-2% on average on interest and monthly rewards etc.

Regular savers are a bit of a con - the headline 2% probably works out at 1% (still better than nowt) by the time you take into account payments in made over the year, interest only added at the end etc.

Whatever happened to a pretty standard bank account that paid a reasonably decent rate of interest? Actually to be fair, Nationwide do if you've been with them a while - 0.6% on unlimited balance I think. Zero fannying around.



Edited by tannhauser on Monday 6th November 16:55

tannhauser

1,773 posts

217 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
barryrs said:
tannhauser said:
3% is infinitely more that the 0% typically on offer!

5% is fantastic, but on 2.5k - wow, that's generous!
The post office are offering around 1.5% IIRC for doing nothing!

Considering the average amount held in savings by UK families is just over £3k id say its pretty fair.
I had (have) a PO account, but as it's now a year old and only an introductory rate (was about 1% a year back), it is now back to zero. Not sure if I can open a new one with the headline rate, but I've opened a similar AA account.

What's the average of 3k savings got to do with anything?!

barryrs

4,415 posts

225 months

Monday 6th November 2017
quotequote all
tannhauser said:
I had (have) a PO account, but as it's now a year old and only an introductory rate (was about 1% a year back), it is now back to zero. Not sure if I can open a new one with the headline rate, but I've opened a similar AA account.

What's the average of 3k savings got to do with anything?!
Simply highlighting that the problems of lazy savers might be an issue for the few rather than the many.