UK bongo flicks further censored by BBFC
Discussion
andy_s said:
Baryonyx said:
krunchkin said:
????
I think it's fairly clear to anyone, and made explicit by Chris and Simon Donald, that the Fat Slags are very much a product of the Toon's Bigg Market.
No doubt that's where the inspiration came from, though as I say, the strip appears to be set in a fictional Manchester area, the script is Mancunian as were the voices on the TV show. Compare and contrast with the obviously Geordie Biffa Bacon or STS script. I think it's fairly clear to anyone, and made explicit by Chris and Simon Donald, that the Fat Slags are very much a product of the Toon's Bigg Market.
scorp said:
CrutyRammers said:
You do wonder what they think they are going to achieve, apart from some sort of misplaced moral high ground.
Like everything these days they are probably reacting to some kind of pressure group, like the DM or something ? rohrl said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-o...
The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
Can these new non-permitted acts be shown in non-bongo/grumble flicks? The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
I mean what makes a move a pr0n movie? Some of these acts (e.g. Spanking, Caning, Physical or verbal abuse) are often seen in "mainstream" movies too.
AndyClockwise said:
Regardless of whether you agree with the ban or not (personally I don't) how can the BBFC reconcile this stance with the fact that they have given approval for films such as "A Serbian Film" to be distributed?
wow!! I'd never heard of this before - and wish I'd remained in that blissful state of ignorance JuniorD said:
rohrl said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-o...
The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
Can these new non-permitted acts be shown in non-bongo/grumble flicks? The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
I mean what makes a move a pr0n movie? Some of these acts (e.g. Spanking, Caning, Physical or verbal abuse) are often seen in "mainstream" movies too.
If these rules applied to ALL films, then Demolition Man might end up being a very different film
Mr Whippy said:
JuniorD said:
rohrl said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-o...
The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
Can these new non-permitted acts be shown in non-bongo/grumble flicks? The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act with an oddly arbitrary list of activities which can no longer be depicted in British-made grumble vids. Henceforth banned are -
Spanking
Caning
Aggressive whipping
Penetration by any object "associated with violence"
Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)
Urolagnia (known as "water sports")
Female ejaculation
Strangulation
Facesitting
Fisting
The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially "life-endangering"
So is this eminent good sense on behalf of the BBFC to protect the UK's pr0n actors and viewers or is it the fascist thought-police in action?
I mean what makes a move a pr0n movie? Some of these acts (e.g. Spanking, Caning, Physical or verbal abuse) are often seen in "mainstream" movies too.
If these rules applied to ALL films, then Demolition Man might end up being a very different film
AndyClockwise said:
Regardless of whether you agree with the ban or not (personally I don't) how can the BBFC reconcile this stance with the fact that they have given approval for films such as "A Serbian Film" to be distributed?
I just looked that film up on IMDb to see what it was about. On the same page they have a "People who liked this film..." link. One of the films listed is called Salo (it's based on the 120 days of Sodom, which I read years ago), am I being too puritanical in thinking the cover picture is completely out of order?Edited by br d on Thursday 4th December 17:19
I've watched a Serbian film. It was so trying so hard to be ott it was actually funny. Genuinely laughing at how bad it's badness was.
I suppose they would say a serbian film is fiction and actors are acting. They are not so much in porn films.
There is another film knocking around. A female performance artist who is into sub culture starred in a film un scripted where she was kidnapped by a truck driver.
How do they rate that she does all the st to herself In the name of art most days.
I suppose they would say a serbian film is fiction and actors are acting. They are not so much in porn films.
There is another film knocking around. A female performance artist who is into sub culture starred in a film un scripted where she was kidnapped by a truck driver.
How do they rate that she does all the st to herself In the name of art most days.
br d said:
I just looked that film up on IMBd to see what it was about. On the same page they have a "People who liked this film..." link. One of the films listed is called Salo (it's based on the 120 days of Sodom, which I read years ago), am I being too puritanical in thinking the cover picture is completely out of order?
Sounds a delightful film...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sal%C3%B2,_or_the_120...
otolith said:
br d said:
I just looked that film up on IMBd to see what it was about. On the same page they have a "People who liked this film..." link. One of the films listed is called Salo (it's based on the 120 days of Sodom, which I read years ago), am I being too puritanical in thinking the cover picture is completely out of order?
Sounds a delightful film...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sal%C3%B2,_or_the_120...
otolith said:
br d said:
I just looked that film up on IMBd to see what it was about. On the same page they have a "People who liked this film..." link. One of the films listed is called Salo (it's based on the 120 days of Sodom, which I read years ago), am I being too puritanical in thinking the cover picture is completely out of order?
Sounds a delightful film...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sal%C3%B2,_or_the_120...
kowalski655 said:
loafer123 said:
Get used to hearing the words...
"Ja...ja...ist gut, ja...uggggnnnhhh, ja...."
Also:"Ja...ja...ist gut, ja...uggggnnnhhh, ja...."
"Ich bin ein plumber. Das waschemachine ist kaput"
Pesty said:
I've watched a Serbian film. It was so trying so hard to be ott it was actually funny. Genuinely laughing at how bad it's badness was.
there isn't any value in that "masterpiece" nor it was the goal of the author, the only goal was to piss the serbian public so the movie gets popularrohrl said:
The British Board of Film Classification (formerly BB of F Censorship) has amended the 2003 Communications Act
Just who the hell gave them the authority to "amend" an act of parliament?by that inference can PH as a body "amend" the Road Traffic Act to remove speed limits
and have MLM's shot
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff