Terrorist attack in Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Discussion
Eclassy said:
3 muslims massacred by Christian man in the US.
Where is the usual PH outrage that usually follows these kind of events.
When will the Christian community come out and apoligise and distance itself from this event?
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31416869
Don't be such a silly apologist troll. You know full well that he's not a terrorist.Where is the usual PH outrage that usually follows these kind of events.
When will the Christian community come out and apoligise and distance itself from this event?
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-31416869
The OP was clumsily trying to say that if some bloke called Mohammed shot dead three young westerners and then claimed it was an argument over a parking space, hordes of PH'ers a) would immediately accuse him of being a terrorist and b) would start raving on about the 'Religion of Peace'. That much is for certain.
The photoshop did look like Barry though.
The photoshop did look like Barry though.
Joey Ramone said:
The OP was clumsily trying to say that if some bloke called Mohammed shot dead three young westerners and then claimed it was an argument over a parking space, hordes of PH'ers a) would immediately accuse him of being a terrorist and b) would start raving on about the 'Religion of Peace'. That much is for certain.
Well, bugger me with a rusty spanner, I thought he was talking about cake...I think all middle aged white men with goatees should apologise. Failure to do so by anyone in that demographic will be taken as support of this murder.
Who wants to go first? Or should we just ask all the atheists to apologise instead?
In all honesty, of course if the roles were reversed - this would not be a 4 page thread; but a 20 page thread by now terrorism or non-terrorism related. The usual "religon of peace" comments, people arguing about immigration, how we should deport all Muslims back out of this country, how they seemingly get special treatment and how they all support these attacks because they aren't ALL marching out against them. Such simple folk we have on here. The OP has actually proved a point, but I'm sure the usual suspects will disagree and in most likelihood are too thick to see that.
Who wants to go first? Or should we just ask all the atheists to apologise instead?
In all honesty, of course if the roles were reversed - this would not be a 4 page thread; but a 20 page thread by now terrorism or non-terrorism related. The usual "religon of peace" comments, people arguing about immigration, how we should deport all Muslims back out of this country, how they seemingly get special treatment and how they all support these attacks because they aren't ALL marching out against them. Such simple folk we have on here. The OP has actually proved a point, but I'm sure the usual suspects will disagree and in most likelihood are too thick to see that.
Edited by zuby84 on Wednesday 11th February 23:06
mybrainhurts said:
Well, bugger me with a rusty spanner, I thought he was talking about cake...
Funny,then,that so many people chose not to acknowledge the point he was making, and debate it, but chose instead to engage in boring semantics regarding his choice of words and accuse him of trolling.Joey Ramone said:
mybrainhurts said:
Well, bugger me with a rusty spanner, I thought he was talking about cake...
Funny,then,that so many people chose not to acknowledge the point he was making, and debate it, but chose instead to engage in boring semantics regarding his choice of words and accuse him of trolling.
zuby84 said:
I think all middle aged white men with goatees should apologise. Failure to do so by anyone in that demographic will be taken as support of this murder.
Who wants to go first? Or should we just ask all the atheists to apologise instead?
In all honesty, of course if the roles were reversed - this would not be a 4 page thread; but a 20 page thread by now terrorism or non-terrorism related. The usual "religon of peace" comments, people arguing about immigration, how we should deport all Muslims back out of this country, how they seemingly get special treatment and how they all support these attacks because they aren't ALL marching out against them. Such simple folk we have on here. The OP has actually proved a point, but I'm sure the usual suspects will disagree and in most likelihood are too thick to see that.
The problem with atheists is that they don't share our western liberal judeo-christian values. If they don't like it here they should FO back to AtheistStan Who wants to go first? Or should we just ask all the atheists to apologise instead?
In all honesty, of course if the roles were reversed - this would not be a 4 page thread; but a 20 page thread by now terrorism or non-terrorism related. The usual "religon of peace" comments, people arguing about immigration, how we should deport all Muslims back out of this country, how they seemingly get special treatment and how they all support these attacks because they aren't ALL marching out against them. Such simple folk we have on here. The OP has actually proved a point, but I'm sure the usual suspects will disagree and in most likelihood are too thick to see that.
Edited by zuby84 on Wednesday 11th February 23:06
- JesuisParkingSpace
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff