Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 6

[Funk]

What's alarming, Strocky, is that you can't see the truth and facts that are right in front of your face.

[2013BRM]

Sorry for butting in guys but isn't it fair to say this move by the Saudis was unprecedented? with the exception, possibly, of the US? what is happening now isn't market fluctuation is it?

[simoid]

Strocky said:

Perceived country/region, bless, the dim is strong in this one

Simple question, is it an independent Scotland that you want or what?

Merry Christmas, fellow Briton, loyal subject

[Funk]

2013BRM said:

Sorry for butting in guys but isn't it fair to say this move by the Saudis was unprecedented? with the exception, possibly, of the US? what is happening now isn't market fluctuation is it?

As I understand it, they've decided to defend market share rather than market price (presumably they're banking on prices rising again as they reap the benefits of a larger market share).

[simoid]

Funk said:

What's alarming, Strocky, is that you can't see the truth and facts that are right in front of your face.

I'm not sure that he can't see it, more a case of he's happy to stare at trees as he doesn't like the woods.

What's more alarming to me is that Strocky rarely (if ever?) makes a post that isn't an insult or a some irrelevant dissection of part of a post. I don't understand what fun you're getting Strocky. Is there an end game?

[2013BRM]

Funk said:

2013BRM said:

Sorry for butting in guys but isn't it fair to say this move by the Saudis was unprecedented? with the exception, possibly, of the US? what is happening now isn't market fluctuation is it?

As I understand it, they've decided to defend market share rather than market price (presumably they're banking on prices rising again as they reap the benefits of a larger market share).

I think it's more of a concerted effort between the US and SA to bring Putin down....but then, I do like a good conspiracy

[NoNeed]

Funk said:

What's alarming, Strocky, is that you can't see the truth and facts that are right in front of your face.

i'm shocked he has not got himself banned again, I don'think it will be long though lol.

[Rollin]

Strocky said:

Rollin said:

So what year would you have started the oil fund?

So you don't understand the graph you posted?

What year would you have started the oil fund?

[///ajd]

Strocky said:

Inconvenient truth, not deflection, it's not only the deluded Nats that need to wake up and smell the coffee

You'll have to explain what coffee needs to be smelled.

Most intelligent Scots voted No.
The union is preserved according to the will of Scots.
The economic muppetry of the SNP has been laid bare.
Alex is in a downward spiral of denial and bitter recriminations.

The SNP present a minor threat of continued divisiveness at the next GE, but it seems the majority are now wide awake to the threat and will act accordingly to consign any SNP actual power to the dustbin of "nah, tried that, they were sh*te".

[Funk]

Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...

[Strocky]

Funk said:

Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

[Funk]

Strocky said:

Funk said:

Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

[Welshbeef]

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote.
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...

Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.

[McWigglebum4th]

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

oh fk off

You bunch of half brains were scared stless of proper independence


Currency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Open borders = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
DVLA = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
EU rebate = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Passport agency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
BBC = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
embassies = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
nato membership = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Shipbuilding = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
bank of england = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that

[Strocky]

Welshbeef said:

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote.
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...

Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.

Well considering Alan Chochrane hasn't sued Private Eye.......

And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin

As you where, beef head

[Strocky]

McWigglebum4th said:

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

oh fk off

You bunch of half brains were scared stless of proper independence


Currency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Open borders = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
DVLA = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
EU rebate = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Passport agency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
BBC = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
embassies = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
nato membership = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Shipbuilding = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
bank of england = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that

Merry Xmas Wiggles, never change

[Welshbeef]

Strocky said:

Welshbeef said:

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote.
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...

Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.

Well considering Alan Chochrane hasn't sued Private Eye.......

And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin

As you where, beef head

You really are pretty dim.

£20k lol that's £11k after tax (excl NI) for someone earning millions a year


I'll admit for someone on min wage or even on ave salary risking bribery for £20k pre tax may appeal to some but to honestly think that would appeal to people earning serious money to risk that salary ongoing and jail time for bribery - someone needs an IQ test (unless you think this chap is pig think and may take a punt on it)

[McWigglebum4th]

Strocky said:

Merry Xmas Wiggles, never change

Strange comment for someone who is new to this board



You lost deal with it you face e painted flag waving shrunken cock fish counting arse

[Strocky]

Welshbeef said:

Strocky said:

Welshbeef said:

Strocky said:

Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote

Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"

Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing

The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely

Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote.
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...

Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.

Well considering Alan Chochrane hasn't sued Private Eye.......

And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin

As you where, beef head

You really are pretty dim.

£20k lol that's £11k after tax (excl NI) for someone earning millions a year


I'll admit for someone on min wage or even on ave salary risking bribery for £20k pre tax may appeal to some but to honestly think that would appeal to people earning serious money to risk that salary ongoing and jail time for bribery - someone needs an IQ test (unless you think this chap is pig think and may take a punt on it)

Speaking to The Drum, Cochrane said that he had no knowledge of the alleged payment but "would take it with open arms" if it was on offer.

http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/17/scottish-da...

Oh dear seems the Unionist in question is pig THICK & a greedy grasping

Why an editor of the Telegraph would be on millions only you would know, did you convert that into Roubles?

Edited by Strocky on Sunday 28th December 21:37

[Rollin]

Strocky said:

Well considering Alan Chochrane hasn't sued Private Eye.......

And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin

As you where, beef head

Why would he sue?