Anyone care to bet where the criminals will be from ?

[carmonk]

grumbledoak said:

carmonk said:

And don't start saying I should read the Koran in Arabic either.

That would be rather ironic. Most Muslims cannot read the arabic. Hell, in the backwaters many cannot read it in any language. They are told what it says and how to think just as the Catholic church held on to Latin to disempower their 'flock'.

Exactly, but often displaying any knowledge of Islam provokes the backup response that we're not interpreting the Koran correctly, and who are we to judge its words if a) we've not read it in Arabic and b) we haven't been brainwashed into accepting certain interpretations by some ranting imam with ten fistfuls of beard.

[TKF]

carmonk said:

TKF said:

Have either of you read the Qur'an?

Chunks of it, yes. I've also read a fair number of the hadiths, listened to literally dozens of online lectures by imams and scholars, read many articles by same, and done other research from books and the web.

Well done you.

So tell me, in your expert opinion, why do all these darkies go for the young whities?

[Rude-boy]

TKF said:

Have either of you read the Qur'an?

Yes, and the old and new testaments of the Bible

Didn't get too far into the dead sea scrolls though and it was many years ago.

I've spent many hours discussing religion with people who have held many wide a varied beliefs including both ends of the Christian faith and both ends of the Muslim faith.

Interpreted one way both the Koran and the Bible set out excellent codes to live your life by, interpreted another way they are the most hateful, disgusting, insightful and vial books ever written.

What man can do in the name of a belief is exactly what makes me chose to avoid those that hold the most radical like the plague as a rule.

[carmonk]

TKF said:

carmonk said:

TKF said:

Have either of you read the Qur'an?

Chunks of it, yes. I've also read a fair number of the hadiths, listened to literally dozens of online lectures by imams and scholars, read many articles by same, and done other research from books and the web.

Well done you.

If you can't handle the answer then don't make assumptions and don't ask the question.

TKF said:

So tell me, in your expert opinion, why do all these darkies go for the young whities?

Who are the darkies? Do you mean the Pakistanis, or do you have special dispensation on this site to use racist language? They go for them because as Jack Straw said, "They're easy meat." Add to that the Islamic and sharia subjugation of women, the blame traditionally apportioned to the raped woman in Islam and the Islamic attitude to the kafir, it's not looking good for the vulnerable young white girl. That doesn't explain the lack of humanity and perversion in the first place though, so maybe you can help with that.

[TKF]

carmonk said:

Who are the darkies? Do you mean the Pakistanis, or do you have special dispensation on this site to use racist language?

The entire thread has been a thinly veiled "Hooray! Evidence that they are all bad! Let's deport the lot of 'em. Pass me Carling. Now where's me Lambert & Butler?" so I thought I'd follow suit.

[Marf]

TKF said:

carmonk said:

Who are the darkies? Do you mean the Pakistanis, or do you have special dispensation on this site to use racist language?

The entire thread has been a thinly veiled "Hooray! Evidence that they are all bad! Let's deport the lot of 'em. Pass me Carling. Now where's me Lambert & Butler?" so I thought I'd follow suit.

So you don't think that examining the background and views of these animals is in any way relevant?

Or is it that you feel to investigate the whys and wherefores is an insult to Islam as a whole?

[carmonk]

TKF said:

carmonk said:

Who are the darkies? Do you mean the Pakistanis, or do you have special dispensation on this site to use racist language?

The entire thread has been a thinly veiled "Hooray! Evidence that they are all bad! Let's deport the lot of 'em. Pass me Carling. Now where's me Lambert & Butler?" so I thought I'd follow suit.

And very predictable you've been too. I refer you back to my first response to you.

[TKF]

Marf said:

TKF said:

carmonk said:

Who are the darkies? Do you mean the Pakistanis, or do you have special dispensation on this site to use racist language?

The entire thread has been a thinly veiled "Hooray! Evidence that they are all bad! Let's deport the lot of 'em. Pass me Carling. Now where's me Lambert & Butler?" so I thought I'd follow suit.

So you don't think that examining the background and views of these animals is in any way relevant?

Or is it that you feel to investigate the whys and wherefores is an insult to Islam as a whole?

The point is there has been a massive erection on here as soon as they were found to be darker and worshipped a different God. The glee at finding out the perpetrators of this crime are called names like Kamar Jamil and Anjun Dogar is palpable.

It now seems that all peedlers are Pakistani because it's in their nature/teaching to do so. Search on PH for "Robert Hathaway" and you'll find nothing. Do the same on Google and you'll find out about their paedophile ring and the fact that two weeks ago they had their sentences doubled. Something to rejoice, no?

[Marf]

TKF said:

The point is there has been a massive erection on here as soon as they were found to be darker and worshipped a different God. The glee at finding out the perpetrators of this crime are called names like Kamar Jamil and Anjun Dogar is palpable.

No, I think what people are trying to get across here is that as a proportion of the population Pakistani muslims seem to be involved disproportiately in kiddy fiddling.

TKF said:

It now seems that all peedlers are Pakistani because it's in their nature/teaching to do so. Search on PH for "Robert Hathaway" and you'll find nothing. Do the same on Google and you'll find out about their paedophile ring and the fact that two weeks ago they had their sentences doubled. Something to rejoice, no?

Indeed it is, so why havent you put your efforts into starting a thread about that, rather than having a hissy fit in this one?

[Chrisw666]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

We're not allowed to mention the reasons they don't speak out are we?

If me and my white mates rented a house in a predominately Asian residential area and started throwing parties for local Asian teenage girls, filling them with booze and taking them off overnight to god knows where it would take a few days before the local community tried to take action against us.

When groups of Asian men do the same thing the Police keep it so quiet even those that should know what is going on are kept in the dark and the neighbours are more irked their parking spaces are being used than that someone elses kids are being abused. The majority of poor white people care about nobody outside their own family and some care about less than that paying little attention to even their own kids safety.

[TKF]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I haven't tried to divert. I've certainly not tried to defend.

My point is the drooling and slavering at the trough when evidence shows they're not from round here.

But maybe I'm wrong for thinking that? Maybe the threads here don't read like a Daily Mail comments page? And maybe is nothing like this thread?

Mod note: please do not link to sites that might cause people issues at work, I realise hovering over the link shows what it is but it can still catch out the unwary.

Edited by Bill on Tuesday 27th March 18:55

[Marf]

TKF said:

My point is the drooling and slavering at the trough when evidence shows they're not from round here.

But they are from "round here", unless you're asserting that Pakistani muslims cannot be british and consider themselves Pakistani and muslim before being british?

[carmonk]

TKF said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I haven't tried to divert. I've certainly not tried to defend.

My point is the drooling and slavering at the trough when evidence shows they're not from round here.

But maybe I'm wrong for thinking that? Maybe the threads here don't read like a Daily Mail comments page? And maybe is nothing like this thread?

You really have nothing to say, do you? Are you going to address the OP story or just carry on with your desperate apologetics and attempt to bully people into not discussing a valid topic? Nobody's fooled by your veiled claims of racism so I suggest you either grow up or jog on.

Edited by Bill on Tuesday 27th March 18:56

[TKF]

No need to shout. It's a political party. What's the problem?

And hovering over links gives you the address. HTH

[TKF]

carmonk said:

You really have nothing to say, do you? Are you going to address the OP story or just carry on with your desperate apologetics and attempt to bully people into not discussing a valid topic? Nobody's fooled by your veiled claims of racism so I suggest you either grow up or jog on.

Sorry for bullying you. Hope you enjoy your book.

[carmonk]

TKF said:

carmonk said:

You really have nothing to say, do you? Are you going to address the OP story or just carry on with your desperate apologetics and attempt to bully people into not discussing a valid topic? Nobody's fooled by your veiled claims of racism so I suggest you either grow up or jog on.

Sorry for bullying you. Hope you enjoy your book.

I said attempted bullying, meaning you haven't succeeded in your intention to intimidate others and suppress free speech by making out posters are racist. Indeed, it could be argued that attitudes like yours are the cause of much of the racism in this country. But I will enjoy the book as I'm all for education.

[TKF]

A question. Would it be right for the people of Thailand to consider white Westerners to be paedophiles?

[Marf]

TKF said:

A question. Would it be right for the people of Thailand to consider white Westerners to be paedophiles?

A question. Who has said that all Pakistani muslims are paedophiles?

[TKF]

Marf said:

TKF said:

A question. Would it be right for the people of Thailand to consider white Westerners to be paedophiles?

A question. Who has said that all Pakistani muslims are paedophiles?

I'll rephrase the question.

Would it be right for the people of Thailand to point at the paedophile sex tourists and automatically link their race/religion and tar communities with the same brush?

"White Christians see themselves as different and they belive people outside their group are worthless. Add the misogyny inherant with the religion and this is what happens"

[jatinder]

anonymous said:

[redacted]