Stunning police response to car theft

Stunning police response to car theft

Author
Discussion

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

160 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
It seems extraordinary that the 'FTP' sites have been up for over a year and known about for almost as long, a whole year, one whole damned year.

The person whose car was stolen put up something on the same media and within a couple of hours, the law abiding get a visit warning not to offend the offenders who stole their car and then eventually set it alight.

This would appear to be about incompetence more than priorities, the failure of competence came first then the priorities took a nosedive in the common-sense department.

Had competence of any real kind been present then these 'neds' who STILL quite openly feel themselves above the law sufficiently to brag and gloat about their exploits would have been hit upon a year ago.

The other unpleasant issue is that the 'neds' appear to be right, they are running rings around the police and the resultant frustration of the police, brought on by their own incompetence, means they almost appear to take out their frustration on the victims of the crime.

What a mess.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

206 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
In todays press and journal we have a new angle

Because it is 12 year olds and teenagers stealing cars it is the fault of the parents by not having them locked in the house


Seems to be a patern forming here

Is it illegal to have a door unlocked?

Digga

40,463 posts

285 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Gene Vincent said:
The other unpleasant issue is that the 'neds' appear to be right, they are running rings around the police and the resultant frustration of the police, brought on by their own incompetence, means they almost appear to take out their frustration on the victims of the crime.
IME it seems to be a very small number of individuals who are responsible for a very high proportion of serious crimes. I do tend to think that targetted zero-tolerance campaigns would net pretty useful results, but what do I know?

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

235 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
It must be assumed that there is one section (named "vehicle crime unit" or similar) who are doing that role, and a second section that deals with "social media" - and the people who are working on the roads are not the same ones calling on the lady whose vehicle was stolen to "give advice on her facebook posts". There will be numerous other sections as well, none of which would be relevant here (OK, the dog section maybe if the police ever got near these thieves hehe ).

Just a shame that the "social media" team are misdirecting their efforts in this instance (oops nuts ) and it's getting rather unfortunate publicity (and so it should). Still, these are "right-on!" politically correct times nowadays, and if anyone might be potentially offended... nuts Presume it's also a performance indicator? redface

All assumption on my part of course - but if people were aware how few out of the total police numbers on duty at a particular time are actually "out on the beat" or working "vehicle crime" then they wouldn't just assume that all the police were looking on the Book of Faces as opposed to looking out for the lady's car and apprehending the 'neds'...

smile

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

160 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Digga said:
Gene Vincent said:
The other unpleasant issue is that the 'neds' appear to be right, they are running rings around the police and the resultant frustration of the police, brought on by their own incompetence, means they almost appear to take out their frustration on the victims of the crime.
IME it seems to be a very small number of individuals who are responsible for a very high proportion of serious crimes. I do tend to think that targetted zero-tolerance campaigns would net pretty useful results, but what do I know?
You are likely to be right, there will be just few of these 'neds' less than a dozen perhaps, but it probably started with just an individual or a pair of them.

But things grow and have grown it seems.

It can only keep growing all the while the victims are the effective target not the perpetrators.

I don't think you even need some sort of specious 'Zero tolerance' campaign, there can be no tolerance of repeated outright contempt for the law and those that are supposed to uphold it, you need good policing and nothing more.

WCZ

10,573 posts

196 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
aw51 121565 said:
It must be assumed that there is one section (named "vehicle crime unit" or similar) who are doing that role, and a second section that deals with "social media"
a section of the police force entirely focused on social media? completely retarded imo.

jaybirduk

1,867 posts

169 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
http://www.facebook.com/garthdeejockyz.ftp

I think it is terrible these poor promising young footballers
How can they get away posting pics of stolen cars and bragging about it online? madmadrage

oyster

12,652 posts

250 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
The public have the policing and justice systen that they have wanted for ages.

Public demand more is done to reduce crime >> politicians, eager to impress public, promise to show they will cut crime and set targets to the police for cutting crime >> police, in turn, focus on quick wins and hence only apprehend on crimes that are either very easy to solve or are very serious and/or high profile.


It's the public's fault.

Art0ir

9,402 posts

172 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Gene Vincent said:
Breadvan72 said:
Even that would be completely outside the police remit. Why should the victim of a crime not have a rant about it on Facebook? That is nothing to do with Mcplod.
Rabble-rousing is not a good idea.
In your opinion. When they crucified a car thief in a certain area of Belfast it had a very positive impact on the lives of local residents.

stargazer30

1,608 posts

168 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Here's a novel idea.

Fit all new cars with a small keypad and a 4 digit pin code. The car works as normal but if you don't put in the pin code it won't go above 20mph.

Most stolen cars are stolen using the keys without the owner being present during the theft so that would solve that one.

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

160 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
stargazer30 said:
Here's a novel idea.

Fit all new cars with a small keypad and a 4 digit pin code. The car works as normal but if you don't put in the pin code it won't go above 20mph.

Most stolen cars are stolen using the keys without the owner being present during the theft so that would solve that one.
Sounds good, trouble is that it is more than likely that the PIN will be the same as the one for your bank account card, so they'll break that and have your car and then your money.

I have a much more novel idea... how about a bit of quality policing, you know, the baddies get nicked and the good people get at least some comfort and eventually with quality policing it has a deterrent effect.

These 'neds' don't see the police as being effective at doing their job, they have zero regard for the uniform and that uniform has zer deterrent effect.

This is because the quality standard of the policing in the area is below par.

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

159 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
What we need in Aberdeen is one of those 'sting' cars, but with a few modifications. You know, the ones that deadlock themselves when the thief gets in so the nearby officers can nab them? Modifications could be release of a deadly gas, explosive seats, airbags filled with nails and remotely set off etc, etc...

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

159 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
They've arrested and charged someone for the RS4:

http://m.local.stv.tv/aberdeen/news/209377-teenage...

AJS-

15,366 posts

238 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
onesickpuppy said:
What we need in Aberdeen is one of those 'sting' cars, but with a few modifications. You know, the ones that deadlock themselves when the thief gets in so the nearby officers can nab them? Modifications could be release of a deadly gas, explosive seats, airbags filled with nails and remotely set off etc, etc...
Mind your hate speak there sonny, the car thieves are probably being released with a caution about now and if they were to read something like that then the trauma alone could be worth hundreds of thousands.

Dixie68

3,091 posts

189 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Just a thought, but has anyone contacted Grampian Police and asked what they're doing about the FB page of car thieves?

anonymous-user

56 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
They shouldn't do anything about it, as it's just a lot of mouth breathers gobbing off on the internet. The police are not here to control speech; even annoying, idiotic and offensive speech. They should be concentrating on catching car thieves, and not wasting time on Facebook.

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

160 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Dixie68 said:
Just a thought, but has anyone contacted Grampian Police and asked what they're doing about the FB page of car thieves?
Come on, we have to give them a chance, they've only had a year or so, it's a bit early to be expecting action.

AJS-

15,366 posts

238 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
They shouldn't do anything about it, as it's just a lot of mouth breathers gobbing off on the internet. The police are not here to control speech; even annoying, idiotic and offensive speech. They should be concentrating on catching car thieves, and not wasting time on Facebook.
Which I would completely agree with if they didn't make a visit to the victim of a car theft, late at night, to give her pointers as to what she should and should not be saying on Facebook.

Also worth noting that the page in question seems to provide at least a lead into who is stealing cars. Even if it is some no mark sad case who just delights in cars being stolen and goes around photographing them, surely the police should be following up on this to see if they can gain an insight into how these people operate.

If, as it appears, the owner of that particular account is actually involved in car theft then surely this would be an easy arrest?

To a layman, knowing only what I've seen in the papers and on this thread, it appears that the police see their only role in tackling car theft as being to rubber stamp the documents so that the owners get their insurance, and that makes me very angry.

Edited by AJS- on Friday 11th January 17:45

XCP

16,963 posts

230 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
"i thought you'd shot a burglar". "I thought you didn't have any officers available until morning"?
Exactly. Prioritising.
Surely you are not suggesting both incidents merit the same response?

KM666

1,757 posts

185 months

Friday 11th January 2013
quotequote all
jaybirduk said:
thinfourth2 said:
http://www.facebook.com/garthdeejockyz.ftp

I think it is terrible these poor promising young footballers
How can they get away posting pics of stolen cars and bragging about it online? madmadrage
The same way local scratters can get away with posing with guns/blades for facebook pictures.