Police in search for missing 5 year old

[TTmonkey]

TRB said:

They quit searching only recently, I'm guessing they knew there were bones, dna, burnt knives and other ghastlies pretty quick. Suppose they were only ever looking for bits of her rather than the body.

Grim

A home fire is unlikely to have destroyed the majority of her bones. Its likely that if he burnt her then there would have been numerous bones or pieces of bones left. its likely he took these and disposed of them (probably on the river) and this is what the police search teams have been looking for.

it seems he may have missed one piece of bone, this partial skull fragment that they have found in the fire place.


I hope he burns in hell forever. I don't believe in God and the devil, but for him, the Soham murderer, and the Dunblane killer, I hope I'm wrong.

[Rollcage]

Welshbeef said:

If I were the police is be checking were he was during Madalines abduction.

Seriously?

[Pesty]

Just read his statement. He taking the piss. Memory loss my arse, he is just paying games in order to get kicks in torturing the parents just hat little bit more.


Torture him until he says where the body is, then torture him some more.

[CraigZR]

A prison sentence is too good for people like this, they should be tortured.

[NDA]

As if the death of your little girl wasn't enough, not knowing how and when would be too much to bear.

Hopefully he'll have years of hell in prison.

[uk66fastback]

Pesty said:

Just read his statement. He taking the piss. Memory loss my arse, he is just paying games in order to get kicks in torturing the parents just hat little bit more.


Torture him until he says where the body is, then torture him some more.

The body was in the black bag he took to the river surely? I don't think it was in one piece ...

How one human could do that to another defies belief.

[ClaphamGT3]

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

[blindswelledrat]

ClaphamGT3 said:

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

99% of the time I would categorically agree with this post.
THis bloke is my exception.
Also I think that a society that is liberal enough to treat this kind of monster as a patient is also too liberal too do anything to prevent this happening again if it does gain any knowledge from the science.
The country is full of people that psychiatrists believe are a danger to the public and yet without a crime committed there is nothing we will do about it.

[prand]

ClaphamGT3 said:

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

This also assumes prisoner/patient co-operation. There's nothing that can compel someone to open up their mind to assessment, I believe many have tried with various levels of success.

[ClaphamGT3]

prand said:

ClaphamGT3 said:

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

This also assumes prisoner/patient co-operation. There's nothing that can compel someone to open up their mind to assessment, I believe many have tried with various levels of success.

You are of course quite right; however it strikes me as absurd not to try

[otolith]

ClaphamGT3 said:

why he did this terrble thing

Lust, callousness and a desire not to be punished for his crimes?

[TTmonkey]

prand said:

ClaphamGT3 said:

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

This also assumes prisoner/patient co-operation. There's nothing that can compel someone to open up their mind to assessment, I believe many have tried with various levels of success.

Use a skull saw to do the examination.

[B17NNS]

ClaphamGT3 said:

If/when he's found guilty, maybe, instead of hanging him/torturing him/leaving him to rot in prison/all the other - lets be charitable - 'knee-jerk' responses we've heard, we should be subjecting him to the most thorough, rigorous psychiatric analysis humanly possible in order to further our understanding of why he did this terrble thing and to better enable us to prevent others from committing similar offences.

Even if we were able to find out 100% how he ticks it won't stop some other sick fk doing something similar.

Put him in prison and let the other inmates have their fun and dispense justice.

[ZR1cliff]

I'm finding this case very frustrating, listening to this piece of crap trying to mix a realistic excuse of the poor little girls death, and at the same time trying to make it look like he had a brain freeze with the disposal of her body.

How he can play games like that, after what he's put that family through is beyond comprehension.

I really really hope they've got enough evidence to stick him behind bars till the day he dies. Th dirty,selfish, unmerciful scum he is.

[ralphrj]

The jury didn't buy his rubbish.

Guilty.

[Rollcage]

No surprise.

[longblackcoat]

The only surprise is that it took the jury 4 hours. Admittedly I was only following it in the Press, but his explanations rank alongside "the dog ate my homework" in terms of credibility.

[TheSnitch]

Being reported on twitter from a fairly reliable media source that he told a priest while he was in prison that he had ''flung'' April's body in the river.

Edited to add, from same source

''But police treat this with caution - they believe he dismembered the body and disposed of the remains in various places.''

What a piece of work

Edited by TheSnitch on Thursday 30th May 12:55

[Grenoble]

longblackcoat said:

The only surprise is that it took the jury 4 hours. Admittedly I was only following it in the Press, but his explanations rank alongside "the dog ate my homework" in terms of credibility.

Sounds about right though... In deciding a mans life, I hope they at least spend a few hours walking through what was presented to them and making sure they all understood both sides of the evidence presented.

[Bradgate]

I'm surprised the jury managed to stretch out their deliberations for 4 hours. I would have thought 10 minutes was all that was required for the foreman to ask "Right, anyone think this guy is innocent?" and everyone else to reply "no chance"