Red Ken is Hypocrite, Shocker!

Author
Discussion

welsh blackbird

Original Poster:

690 posts

245 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all

Hackney

6,862 posts

209 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
So the money's still in the company and he hasn't actually paid himself anything yet?

I can't stand Ken Livingstone but from what I read he hasn't (yet) contradicted himself.

Streps

2,450 posts

167 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Can't say i'm suprised.
As someone has commented in the page
"Britain is corrupt, from the top down... I am ashamed."

Too many politicians around for the money.. and not for the country.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Good story, but I wonder how many of PH's powerfully built directors employ their wives to make use of their tax allowances...

welsh blackbird

Original Poster:

690 posts

245 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Inkyfingers said:
Good story, but I wonder how many of PH's powerfully built directors employ their wives to make use of their tax allowances...
Maybe they do, but how many of them have also said:-

“These rich b------- just don’t get it… No one should be allowed to vote in a British election, let alone sit in Parliament, unless they pay their full share of tax."?

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Inkyfingers said:
Good story, but I wonder how many of PH's powerfully built directors employ their wives to make use of their tax allowances...
Do you understand the basis of hypocrisy?

Jasandjules

70,009 posts

230 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
What? Leftie in trying to keep lots of money and not give it away to the rest of the people shock!?!?!?

Surely not. Next you'll be telling me that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown haven't given away all their immoral earnings to the state to divide up and spread the wealth. You know the wealth, it's the stuff they were trying to take away from everyone else...

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
What? Leftie in trying to keep lots of money and not give it away to the rest of the people shock!?!?!?

Surely not. Next you'll be telling me that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown haven't given away all their immoral earnings to the state to divide up and spread the wealth. You know the wealth, it's the stuff they were trying to take away from everyone else...


The Blairs house, blood money buys some fine property these days for 'men of the people'.
NuLabour, shafting the working man since 1997, and getting their snouts in the trough before anyone else.

Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
johnfm said:
Do you understand the basis of hypocrisy?
Yes I do, thanks. I can't stand the hypocritical little toad, my point is that we all do our best to avoid tax and there is a very fuzzy line between what is legally and morally acceptable.

That article was also not strictly accurate as it makes out that he has avoided income tax buy leaving cash in his business when in fact he has just put off paying the tax till a later date.

johnfm

13,668 posts

251 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Yes, we all do try to minimise tax. But we don't then make the claims he does about the rich avoiding taxes. That is why he is being a hypocrite.


frosted

3,549 posts

178 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Apache said:
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?
Better than incompetent Boris ? I think so

Du1point8

21,613 posts

193 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
frosted said:
Apache said:
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?
Better than incompetent Boris ? I think so
Why is that? Personal opinion?

chris watton

22,477 posts

261 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Apache said:
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?
I wonder how many of ken's votes are genuine, though. Who normally votes for him - people who supposedly live with 16 others in a one-bed flat? I suspect vote rigging is rife.

simonrockman

6,869 posts

256 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
He's the man who said

The Routemaster wouldn't be scrapped and would go on another 17 years to be replaced by a bus built "by Londoners for Londoners", then scrapped the routemaster and bought bendy buses. When it became clear that this was a mistake he fudged it by saying the bendy buses were "just a trial" - yes 600 buses for many years is a big trial, I wonder what a roll out would be.

He also said anyone who worked for the Evening Standard, which had a long history of being a fascist newspaper was themselves a fascist. Ignoring the fact that for many years he was a restaurant reviewer for the Standard.

When he called a Jewish Standard reporter a Nazi he claimed than he did so in his spare time and was not speaking as the mayor, but when I asked him if he took time out of his holiday allowance to attend the inquest for bringing his office into disrepute he said he never had time off, he was always the mayor, even when he was digging the garden.

He said he would never stand as an independent against a Labour candidate. And then he did.

There are many times where his justification for a policy change is that he "changed his mind".

In that video he says "Let me think about that", Why? For that programme all questions were submitted in writing before.

There is nothing he likes more than a really good fight, particularly against the rich. He said of some rich people "No-one gets to be that rich without being a criminal".

I would love to see a debate between him and working class, Labour Peer, Lord Sugar.

Simon

frosted

3,549 posts

178 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Even though i could argue my point I feel like there no reason debating anything to do with labour here. I'm going get some sun




Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
frosted said:
Apache said:
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?
Better than incompetent Boris ? I think so
at least incompetence is honest, even if you could accuse Boris of being that

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Apache said:
frosted said:
Apache said:
Idiots will still vote for him though, that's the most depressing thing about it all.

In fact why do people vote for any of em anymore?
Better than incompetent Boris ? I think so
at least incompetence is honest, even if you could accuse Boris of being that
Yup - give me honest mistakes any time over socialist ideology. The latter has been proved far more dangerous more than once.

bad company

18,730 posts

267 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I wonder how many of ken's votes are genuine, though. Who normally votes for him - people who supposedly live with 16 others in a one-bed flat? I suspect vote rigging is rife.
I'm no fan of Red Ken but I don't think you're right. A lot of Londoners actually like him. hurl

mike62

192 posts

185 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
bad company said:
chris watton said:
I wonder how many of ken's votes are genuine, though. Who normally votes for him - people who supposedly live with 16 others in a one-bed flat? I suspect vote rigging is rife.
I'm no fan of Red Ken but I don't think you're right. A lot of Londoners actually like him. hurl
ust proves how many aholes there are in London.