People suggesting return of RY Britannia.
People suggesting return of RY Britannia.
Author
Discussion

FiF

Original Poster:

48,650 posts

280 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Here is one op ed piece from Willy Hague

"Scrapping the Royal Yacht Britannia was self-defeating, short-sighted Blairite point-scoring." Frankly that's hitting the nail on the head time. Basically it was, anybody who had been on it, either as guest or crew knew it had an aura.

Bring it back? Hmm really not so sure on this. Firstly in the age where billionaires have the most outrageous and fanciful yachts it would have to be something else.

Secondly part of the magic was the history, a new craft wouldn't have that, it would be just another gin palace extraordinaire, and by the time a new one was built Her Maj might no longer be on the throne and it would be Chazzer and Camilla, well, time for a Republic?

Refurb the old Britannia, well if you've ever been on the bridge of Britannia you'd know it would be a major major refit just to get a quarter of any necessary modern kit in there, never mind the rest of the accommodation and services. So that could have the history, but that's a dead duck imo.

So basically this is an idea that's past its time, so why? Just why?

Or maybe it's me that is missing the point, despite having a great deal of affection for the old girl.

Oceanic

731 posts

130 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
If we can't even maintain our new naval vessels I don't think we should be tinkering with antique vessels.

Esseesse

9,027 posts

237 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
I think we should have a Royal Yacht, and it should probably be a new one. Don't care if it's Chazzer who gets to go on it, not interested in becoming a republic.

Tony Starks

2,396 posts

241 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Would been a lot cheaper to restore it/build a new one than the Millennium Dome turned out to be.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

122 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Surely there are better things to spend money on during these supposedly austere times.

GlenMH

5,458 posts

272 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Good luck with that as she will need completely refitting in the propulsion department. There are very very few steam trained people left in the RN. I know because I was one of the last and I left 16 years ago!

Commercial steam kit is completely different....

eharding

14,648 posts

313 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
GlenMH said:
Good luck with that as she will need completely refitting in the propulsion department. There are very very few steam trained people left in the RN. I know because I was one of the last and I left 16 years ago!
I wouldn't go drinking in pubs near naval dockyards then....I hear they're bringing back press-gangs as well.

One minute you're stumbling down the road after 8 pints of Thruttocks Old Detestable, and the next thing you know, you wake up here....



...with a splitting headache and a piece of paper saying you've signed on for another 20 years.

Smollet

16,352 posts

219 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
rofl

FiF

Original Poster:

48,650 posts

280 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Not to mention brass hats shouting orders down the voice pipe.

"Left hand down a bit Mr Phillips"


Hosenbugler

1,856 posts

131 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
What has to be remembered, is that describinbg the vessel as a "Yacht" is a bit of a misnomer. Basically because "Yacht" in many ways can be seen as "Pleasure vessel" .

What Brittania was, is basically a floating embassy. Furthering our interests across the world, replete with head of state!

So, how much good will and business did visits by Brittania make? I've a feelling an awful lot no doubt somebody somewhere would have such figures. Do we need to replace it? Personally , I'd be pleased if they did , but who knows, hss such a vehicle of diplomacy had its day?

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
Looks like there's momentum to recommission it but it's going to be used by the SNP and the Scottish parliament. Seems fair enough since it's acyptually theirs and in Edinburgh already.

FiF

Original Poster:

48,650 posts

280 months

Tuesday 20th September 2016
quotequote all
I'm torn tbh, per OP thought the decision by Blair et al was a petty point scoring matter. So part of me thinks there is something that's worth having, but now it's gone, not sure.

Having said that those sort of shows can certainly make an impression. One of the bigger deals we ever closed was with Americans after a dinner on a Thames sailing barge. Some years back admittedly, but they were gob smacked when we pissed off London evening commuters by opening Tower Bridge so we could sail through whilst having cocktails, then did it all again on the return.

AlexC1981

5,746 posts

246 months

Tuesday 11th October 2016
quotequote all
Something like this but much bigger cloud9







Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

290 months

Tuesday 11th October 2016
quotequote all
Why not use one of those new aircraft carriers instead? We can't afford enough aircraft for both anyway.

Tryke3

1,609 posts

123 months

Tuesday 11th October 2016
quotequote all
Pound is loosing its arse and our beloved mps want to spend few hundred millions on a boat so they can do less work and eat more caviar. Pathetic
Who gets impressed by boats anymore, is the answer zimbabwe ?

s3fella

10,524 posts

216 months

Tuesday 11th October 2016
quotequote all
Tryke3 said:
Pound is loosing its arse and our beloved mps want to spend few hundred millions on a boat so they can do less work and eat more caviar. Pathetic
Who gets impressed by boats anymore, is the answer zimbabwe ?
Jesus, what a whinger. Get some perspective and do a bit of research into currencies. Look at the US$ in 2007. Did the USA disappear up it's own arse when the $ tanked to near half it's current value?
FX changes all the time and a weak £ does not indicate a weak UK. It merely shows that the market is chosing to invest in other CURRENCY, not countries currency. This can be for MANY reasons, political, economic or just to make st loads of cash on the market itself.
And whilst a weak £ may make your foreign holiday more pricey, it makes it cheaper for people to come to the UK to spend their money here and cheaper for us to export things. So it is not al bad just "different".
Tell me do you think Greece the most fked Eurozone / EU economy would not appreciate an opportunity to devalue its currency? Of course to do so or be allowed to it would have to pay back st loads of borrowed EU cash but they'd jump at the chance if it weren't for that.

Get some perspective, man, FFS and stop worrying about things you will have forgotten about by the time we are out of the EU.


Tryke3

1,609 posts

123 months

Wednesday 12th October 2016
quotequote all
Do you really think an devalued £ just means a slightly more expensive holiday ? You sure its me who needs to get some perspective ? Like most of the country you are just regurgitating stuff you heard, with no idea what it actually means or what it actual implications are. All of sudden since april everyone is a slight expert in economics

If you look at the usa, their devaued $ is bringing Mr trump closer to pulling the nuclear trigger also it includes millions of middle classes who are much worse, poor people left homeless and the super rich only richer etc etc, surelly you know this and you thinking USA as an example was just a mistake ?

Edited by Tryke3 on Wednesday 12th October 08:52

DMN

3,057 posts

168 months

Wednesday 12th October 2016
quotequote all
As I said in the other thread:

There are enough special snow flake units in the Armed Forces without another one taking men, material and money away from actual war fighting capability. Its more jingoistic claptrap.

hairyben

8,516 posts

212 months

Wednesday 12th October 2016
quotequote all
s3fella said:
Jesus, what a whinger. Get some perspective and do a bit of research into currencies. Look at the US$ in 2007. Did the USA disappear up it's own arse when the $ tanked to near half it's current value?
FX changes all the time and a weak £ does not indicate a weak UK. It merely shows that the market is chosing to invest in other CURRENCY, not countries currency. This can be for MANY reasons, political, economic or just to make st loads of cash on the market itself.
And whilst a weak £ may make your foreign holiday more pricey, it makes it cheaper for people to come to the UK to spend their money here and cheaper for us to export things. So it is not al bad just "different".
Tell me do you think Greece the most fked Eurozone / EU economy would not appreciate an opportunity to devalue its currency? Of course to do so or be allowed to it would have to pay back st loads of borrowed EU cash but they'd jump at the chance if it weren't for that.

Get some perspective, man, FFS and stop worrying about things you will have forgotten about by the time we are out of the EU.
The number of psuedo lefties running around complaining loudly ahout poor exchange rates and stock markets is very revealing of the "any old fact I dont understand will do" mindset.

As for the boat, if its worth so much to biz couldnt bae knock one up with the help of a few buddies? Make a few sister ships you can bang out for a markup to a few oligarks and shieks wanting the most posey thing "my yaught has a tennis court and 3 swimming pools" "oh such vulgarity is so 2016, we travel in a britannia class my dear, same as the queen of england."