Nutmeg online investment - opinions?

Nutmeg online investment - opinions?

Author
Discussion

Ginge R

4,761 posts

220 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
You're even closer than I thought. I'll message you, coffee sounds good.

g4ry13

17,123 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th June 2017
quotequote all
Anyone still doing this? I'm on risk profile 7/10 and have had some money in since end of March.

It was actually a little alarming that within a few weeks I had lost about 1.7% of my account. It seems that there's been a few good days for the fund and after about 2 months am now +1.4%. I'm considering putting a bit more in but still waiting to be convinced a bit more by some stable growth.

Or maybe I should chuck in some money and forget about it for a few years. scratchchin

XJ75

438 posts

141 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
I put the full ISA allowance in Nutmeg right at the end of the last tax year (April 2017). I'm on risk profile 8 and it's currently up 1.75% in 2 months. I know the market in general has been strong in that period, so I'm not going to get too excited.

limpsfield

5,896 posts

254 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
Or maybe I should chuck in some money and forget about it for a few years. scratchchin
Isn't that the point? These are all investment vehicles/wrappers not short term trading instruments.

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

222 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
Anyone judging these services purely on performance (particularly over a short time frame) is kind of missing the point. These services simply provide a route to market, by suggesting a sensible spread of asset allocation based on your profile. Performance will largely be dicated by the performance of the underlying markets tracked, it has little to do with the platform being good or bad.

If you take a high risk approach you will have a higher exposure to equities, including overseas equities. If you take a lower risk approach you will have a higher exposure towards corproate bonds. Equities, as a rule of tumb, tend to deliver better long term returns but with more volatility. So if you invest in equities, and then markets fall, you will lose money if you hold tracker funds (and vice versa).




g4ry13

17,123 posts

256 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
limpsfield said:
g4ry13 said:
Or maybe I should chuck in some money and forget about it for a few years. scratchchin
Isn't that the point? These are all investment vehicles/wrappers not short term trading instruments.
To some extent. I could invest in some equities which pay a good dividend and so long as the dividend keeps getting paid then I could be looking at 7% return on income. Obviously there's the aspect of share price increase/decrease and risk the dividend may stop being paid.

For me the decision would be what else would I do with the money over an x year time horizon? If Nutmeg is unable to produce something consistent and which convinces me that it's balanced then I will look elsewhere for investments.

Frankstar123

162 posts

136 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
Had Nutmeg.com since October. 1.9% increase as of today.....

wiffmaster

2,604 posts

199 months

Wednesday 7th June 2017
quotequote all
I'm with Moneyfarm. Same idea as Nutmeg, but cheaper for anything £10k and has an Android app (which was a big selling point!)

Set it up as a bit of an experiment, as I work in FS and was interested in what the FinTechs offer compared to the big players.

Highest risk portfolio, up 2.05% since end of March when I started (3 year horizon). Historic performance here.

Impressed with the interface and hassle free experience. Concept is spot on - hopefully same can be said for their investment strategy!



williaa68

1,528 posts

167 months

Thursday 8th June 2017
quotequote all
I would have been one of nutmeg's earlier customers but have just moved out. Their underperformance last year was significant, in effect they missed a once in a life time opportunity by being wrongly positioned at the time of brexit and, to a lesser extent the Trump rally. I hope they get it right but the tech without the investment content being right is like having a shiny car with no engine....

Frankstar123

162 posts

136 months

Thursday 8th June 2017
quotequote all
williaa68 said:
I would have been one of nutmeg's earlier customers but have just moved out. Their underperformance last year was significant, in effect they missed a once in a life time opportunity by being wrongly positioned at the time of brexit and, to a lesser extent the Trump rally. I hope they get it right but the tech without the investment content being right is like having a shiny car with no engine....
So who are you with now Willaa68?

Ta

g4ry13

17,123 posts

256 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
It's almost 9 months to the day since I first deposited in Nutmeg. It started off in the negative for the first few weeks but then turned positive and hasn't gone back into the negative.

The returns haven't been astonishing but currently up 5.17% since March. I'll leave the money there and see how it goes next year.

DonkeyApple

55,722 posts

170 months

Saturday 23rd December 2017
quotequote all
That seems pretty reasonable. They say timing is everything and if I recall, in April this year the main indices shat themselves so if you’d waited a couple of weeks you would have very different annual performance. But then that is why many people drip feed in over time so as to smooth out that risk.

BanzaiMan

157 posts

148 months

Saturday 23rd December 2017
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Anyone judging these services purely on performance (particularly over a short time frame) is kind of missing the point. These services simply provide a route to market, by suggesting a sensible spread of asset allocation based on your profile. Performance will largely be dicated by the performance of the underlying markets tracked, it has little to do with the platform being good or bad.
If you go for (using Nutmeg as an example) their fixed allocation portfolio, would tend to agree (although it seems very skewed towards UK holdings (as others also seem to do), maybe this is because in the absence of physical handholding, the investor may get spooked by non-GBP assets fluctuating when currency moves). The more expensive fully managed portfolio seems as though they are using tactical asset allocation, so would question your statement.

CaptainSensib1e said:
If you take a lower risk approach you will have a higher exposure towards corproate bonds.
And/or Government bonds (and maybe property).

As pointed out on a previous thread - would be useful to see how it performs compared to something like Vanguard LS, or for less of a UK skew, a global equity tracker married with a global bond fund (with annual rebalancing)



g4ry13

17,123 posts

256 months

Saturday 23rd December 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
That seems pretty reasonable. They say timing is everything and if I recall, in April this year the main indices shat themselves so if you’d waited a couple of weeks you would have very different annual performance. But then that is why many people drip feed in over time so as to smooth out that risk.
I'm on a risk profile of 7/10.

I first started off with some money and when I saw that it probably wasn't going to lose me a large % I put in more a few weeks later so I had double the amount I started with.

Initially I thought i'd change my risk profile depending on market volatility but have taken a more passive approach and not touched it.

brickwall

5,255 posts

211 months

Tuesday 26th December 2017
quotequote all
I'm on risk profile 7/10 and this year it's returned 6.1% net of fees.

(I actually think it's slightly higher than that, but not sure how they're calculating the returns as I've added to the balance over the year).

Personally I like it as:
- 6.1% ain't bad
- It has managed to smooth out most of the losses on the main indices - something in the algorithm seems to be limiting the downside exposure.
- It's dead easy to use. That has value to me.

audidoody

8,597 posts

257 months

Wednesday 27th December 2017
quotequote all
I'm up 13.1% over two years with Nutmeg - I drip feed a couple of £100 every month

liam1986

2,121 posts

168 months

Wednesday 27th December 2017
quotequote all
Another happy nutmeg customer here.

Put some money in last December. Up 12.5% so far, that's on a 8/10 risk profile.

BanzaiMan

157 posts

148 months

Wednesday 27th December 2017
quotequote all
brickwall said:
I'm on risk profile 7/10 and this year it's returned 6.1% net of fees.

(I actually think it's slightly higher than that, but not sure how they're calculating the returns as I've added to the balance over the year).

Personally I like it as:
- 6.1% ain't bad
- It has managed to smooth out most of the losses on the main indices - something in the algorithm seems to be limiting the downside exposure.
- It's dead easy to use. That has value to me.
What losses on the main indices are you referring to?

The global market doesn't seem too volatile (even less so when combined with equivalent global bond fund)

http://www.hl.co.uk/funds/fund-discounts,-prices--...


BanzaiMan

157 posts

148 months

Wednesday 27th December 2017
quotequote all
liam1986 said:
Another happy nutmeg customer here.

Put some money in last December. Up 12.5% so far, that's on a 8/10 risk profile.
What are you benchmarking against to determine how happy you are?

liam1986

2,121 posts

168 months

Wednesday 27th December 2017
quotequote all
BanzaiMan said:
liam1986 said:
Another happy nutmeg customer here.

Put some money in last December. Up 12.5% so far, that's on a 8/10 risk profile.
What are you benchmarking against to determine how happy you are?
A gain of less than 10%.

Forgive me, for giving straight forward answer.

Please enlighten me as to why an investment that has returned 12+% in 12 months isn't something to be happy about.

I have withdrawn some money too. The funds were in my bank account the next working day.