Katie Hopkins - vacuous moron
Discussion
Shuvi McTupya said:
citizensm1th said:
Well she get what she sows, she has a history of not being very nice to people she dislikes and it is unsurprising people are not very nice to her
There is quite a difference between 'not very nice' and 'she's a dogface b
h' though!Mind you, she is white and straight, so she is not allowed to be offended.
It's a damning reflection on our current "social media" society that this woman is recognised at all.
The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
OzzyR1 said:
It's a damning reflection on our current "social media" society that this woman is recognised at all.
The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
And yet an --alleged indecent--- involving the PM's parents years ago is being "used" to politically smear the PM and gets used to promote a book.The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
As I said, the same "type of poison" is spread evenly on both sides.
OzzyR1 said:
It's a damning reflection on our current "social media" society that this woman is recognised at all.
The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
The problem is, the people who idolise her are idiots as well. They feel comforted by the fact that an idiot like them can become famous and influential. The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
Of course idiots, don't know they're idiots. They think Hopkins "speaks the truth" without ever questioning that "truth". In reality, they just want to be told their biases and their prejudices are right and thus, will look for anyone or anything that will tell them this.
kippertie said:
OzzyR1 said:
It's a damning reflection on our current "social media" society that this woman is recognised at all.
The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
And yet an --alleged indecent--- involving the PM's parents years ago is being "used" to politically smear the PM and gets used to promote a book.The fact she is cited as an authoritative mouthpiece on various issues is astonishing.
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
As I said, the same "type of poison" is spread evenly on both sides.
captain_cynic said:
The problem is, the people who idolise her are idiots as well. They feel comforted by the fact that an idiot like them can become famous and influential.
Of course idiots, don't know they're idiots. They think Hopkins "speaks the truth" without ever questioning that "truth". In reality, they just want to be told their biases and their prejudices are right and thus, will look for anyone or anything that will tell them this.
Yup, totally agree.Of course idiots, don't know they're idiots. They think Hopkins "speaks the truth" without ever questioning that "truth". In reality, they just want to be told their biases and their prejudices are right and thus, will look for anyone or anything that will tell them this.
The fact that people were donating money to one of the Kardashians a couple of years ago, with the intent of making one of them the youngest ever billionaire is absolutely mad.
Think it was this:
https://www.businessinsider.com/kylie-jenner-gofun...
The social media adoration has got to such a level, people who probably can't afford to spare much cash were sending money to someone already worth $900million to make them a billionaire.
It's crazy, beyond crazy.
JuniorD said:
kippertie said:
JuniorD said:
She's pure poison.
She is just the other side of the coin. There is equal poison on both sides of that particular coin, not a currency I wish to have in my hand.Whichever side you fall on, there are extremists. Hopkins would probably say she was a Conservative voter, but her views do not align with any of the Tories I know.
She is a nasty piece of work and seems to revel in it, God knows why after publically being taken to the cleaners by Jack Monroe.
OzzyR1 said:
Everyone, (even the tabloid readers) know deep down that she is an idiot though? They must do.
I don't think she's stupid, appreciate that's possibly not quite what you're saying. She comes across to me as seriously unwell which makes it doubly grotesque that the media keep her in the spotlight.If something doesn't change it feels like she's headed to dark places, at this point I'm sure that's just karma to many.
bhstewie said:
hstewie said:
Randy Winkman said:
coppernorks said:
Typical Guardian, designed to stoke outrage among the swivel-eyed leftie loons that are addicted to its socialist slanted rhetoric.
Eh? What have they done wrong in this case? "• This article was amended on 5 October 2020 to remove an incorrect statement that the mosque was the target of a far-right terrorist attack in 2017. This occurred at another mosque close by."
otolith said:
ATG said:
I'm white and straight and I'm allowed to be offended. Katie Hopkins offends me. I think she represents a cancer in our society. She lets narrow-minded bigots think their views are normal rather than the result of personal moral failure.
Likewise.Edited by kippertie on Tuesday 6th October 09:17
OzzyR1 said:
Unless I'm mistaken, she was a failed contestant on The Apprentice years ago. How she has now reached a level where people seek her opinion on current events is mystifying.
Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
I mostly agree with this, I am not offended by her, but I am also not 'offended' by extreme lefties/antifa/BLM/Marxists. I just don't agree with them. I guess I am not easily offended. She is really not much different to your Piers Morgans of the world, she just goes a little bit further.Understand that her schtick is to be controversial, and if she can make a living out of it via the Daily Mail, fair play I suppose.
As far as being a 'failed contestant on the Apprentice'. Surely just getting through the application process and getting selected for that show proves there is more to her than just being a dumb blonde.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff