Conspiracy theorists... are they all just a bit thick?
Discussion
coldel said:
The working class threw their votes at Etonian Boris, despite the fact he couldn't give two s
ts about them nor did he really give two sts whether we were in or out of Europe, it was just a big power grab by a somewhat psychotic politician. Its funny what people will do when motivated enough!
But that was a temporary swing based on a promise to free the U.K. from the oppressive shackles of evil foreigners and to be ruled by the King of Chavs instead. We're trending back to the long term base now by the looks of things. ts about them nor did he really give two sts whether we were in or out of Europe, it was just a big power grab by a somewhat psychotic politician. Its funny what people will do when motivated enough!coldel said:
Yes, this is a fundamental underpinning when CT talk about their chosen subjects. Everyone that disagrees with their standpoint must by definition be in a very tight defined box in the far corner. They know this isn't true, yet it is parroted back time and time again.
The real world looks more like...
0.1% CT who refuse to move from their position regardless
99.8% who think about whats put in front of them without an agenda and make a call on it
0.1% Lets use the CT phrase 'govern me harder'
A CT you will see will use tactics like grouping the last two together to make it easier to counter argue, that the extreme other end is wrong, and of course it is, politicians lie, companies cheat etc. but the reality is that the majority sit in the middle without their agenda but instead trying to make informed sensible choices.
One can probably split U.K. society into two groups. Both groups consider politicians to generally be chiselling little sThe real world looks more like...
0.1% CT who refuse to move from their position regardless
99.8% who think about whats put in front of them without an agenda and make a call on it
0.1% Lets use the CT phrase 'govern me harder'
A CT you will see will use tactics like grouping the last two together to make it easier to counter argue, that the extreme other end is wrong, and of course it is, politicians lie, companies cheat etc. but the reality is that the majority sit in the middle without their agenda but instead trying to make informed sensible choices.
ts but the deviation occurs in how the two explain this, the first generally explain this belief by thinking that the bulk of 'leaders' are an amalgamation of incompetents, grifters, loons and kiss arses who generally can't organise a poss up in a brewery, whereas the second group prefer to believe that these people are evil geniuses in league with each other across the planet with extreme and extraordinary organisational and secret keeping skills who all follow orders from a mystical cabal of lizards and that anyone who doesn't follow their religion must also either be in league with the lizards or trapped in the matrix and either way they must agree 100% with the Lizard people. Some people just have to have a religion to devoutly follow. Many CTs are just 21st century Puritans waiting, primed for a leader to point them at who to put on trains for the next holocaust.
DonkeyApple said:
coldel said:
Yes, this is a fundamental underpinning when CT talk about their chosen subjects. Everyone that disagrees with their standpoint must by definition be in a very tight defined box in the far corner. They know this isn't true, yet it is parroted back time and time again.
The real world looks more like...
0.1% CT who refuse to move from their position regardless
99.8% who think about whats put in front of them without an agenda and make a call on it
0.1% Lets use the CT phrase 'govern me harder'
A CT you will see will use tactics like grouping the last two together to make it easier to counter argue, that the extreme other end is wrong, and of course it is, politicians lie, companies cheat etc. but the reality is that the majority sit in the middle without their agenda but instead trying to make informed sensible choices.
One can probably split U.K. society into two groups. Both groups consider politicians to generally be chiselling little sThe real world looks more like...
0.1% CT who refuse to move from their position regardless
99.8% who think about whats put in front of them without an agenda and make a call on it
0.1% Lets use the CT phrase 'govern me harder'
A CT you will see will use tactics like grouping the last two together to make it easier to counter argue, that the extreme other end is wrong, and of course it is, politicians lie, companies cheat etc. but the reality is that the majority sit in the middle without their agenda but instead trying to make informed sensible choices.
ts but the deviation occurs in how the two explain this, the first generally explain this belief by thinking that the bulk of 'leaders' are an amalgamation of incompetents, grifters, loons and kiss arses who generally can't organise a poss up in a brewery, whereas the second group prefer to believe that these people are evil geniuses in league with each other across the planet with extreme and extraordinary organisational and secret keeping skills who all follow orders from a mystical cabal of lizards and that anyone who doesn't follow their religion must also either be in league with the lizards or trapped in the matrix and either way they must agree 100% with the Lizard people. Some people just have to have a religion to devoutly follow. Many CTs are just 21st century Puritans waiting, primed for a leader to point them at who to put on trains for the next holocaust.
PurplePenguin said:
Might be wise to be a little more considered with the emotive language you are using
Let me tell you a little story. There was this general who lost a war, so he made up this little conspiracy that a certain religious minority had stabbed the country in the back and they hadn’t really lost. This was taken up by a failed painter and ex corporal who used it to become head of the country, the consequence of which was that religious minority being put on trains to be killed in concentration camps.This is why conspiracies should be exposed for the lies that they are.
MBBlat said:
PurplePenguin said:
Might be wise to be a little more considered with the emotive language you are using
Let me tell you a little story. There was this general who lost a war, so he made up this little conspiracy that a certain religious minority had stabbed the country in the back and they hadn’t really lost. This was taken up by a failed painter and ex corporal who used it to become head of the country, the consequence of which was that religious minority being put on trains to be killed in concentration camps.This is why conspiracies should be exposed for the lies that they are.
MBBlat said:
PurplePenguin said:
Might be wise to be a little more considered with the emotive language you are using
Let me tell you a little story. There was this general who lost a war, so he made up this little conspiracy that a certain religious minority had stabbed the country in the back and they hadn’t really lost. This was taken up by a failed painter and ex corporal who used it to become head of the country, the consequence of which was that religious minority being put on trains to be killed in concentration camps.This is why conspiracies should be exposed for the lies that they are.
They are the vegetable army of those of nefarious intent.
DonkeyApple said:
Who are the bottom pair? They look like budget Arthur Scargill and John Wayne lookalikies?
I recognise the bottom right one. Just googled and he is called Kenneth Copeland and has an apparent net worth of 750m.I mean god would want him to have all that money and not help the poor or needy
Challo said:
I recognise the bottom right one. Just googled and he is called Kenneth Copeland and has an apparent net worth of 750m.
I mean god would want him to have all that money and not help the poor or needy
Given that the meek are going to inherit the entire planet, I think they can hardly whinge about giving all of their current paltry earnings away. It's nothing to then. I mean god would want him to have all that money and not help the poor or needy
A possible new Northern lights sighting may be in the offing tonight apparently. The usual moronic comments about HAARP are appearing again, insinuating that it’s all manipulation.
It’s just a University in Alaska fgs.
I’ve found their page, and they are saying that it’s nothing to do with them. I’ve posted it in reply to some of the CTists on FB, only to get the predictable reply;
‘They would say that wouldn’t they’.
Yes, like a University have a dastardly plan on World control, or something.
https://haarp.gi.alaska.edu/
It’s just a University in Alaska fgs.
I’ve found their page, and they are saying that it’s nothing to do with them. I’ve posted it in reply to some of the CTists on FB, only to get the predictable reply;
‘They would say that wouldn’t they’.
Yes, like a University have a dastardly plan on World control, or something.
https://haarp.gi.alaska.edu/
DonkeyApple said:
Al Gorithum said:
Who are the bottom pair? They look like budget Arthur Scargill and John Wayne lookalikies?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Ron_Hubbard
g3org3y said:
DonkeyApple said:
Al Gorithum said:
Who are the bottom pair? They look like budget Arthur Scargill and John Wayne lookalikies?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Ron_Hubbard
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff