Geek Jokes

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Gwagon111

4,422 posts

163 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
james_tigerwoods said:
I thought we'd done this one to death.

Marmite, it's the only way to ensure spinning cat.
It's since been proven, that you must spread the cat with Tikka masala, then drop it towards white shag pile carpet for the best results yes.

im

34,302 posts

219 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
Gwagon111 said:
james_tigerwoods said:
I thought we'd done this one to death.

Marmite, it's the only way to ensure spinning cat.
It's since been proven, that you must spread the cat with Tikka masala, then drop it towards white shag pile carpet for the best results yes.
nono You need to douse one side of the cat in red wine and the other must be smeared in curry sauce and then drop it towards your new white settee.

havoc

30,332 posts

237 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
im said:
nono You need to douse one side of the cat in red wine and the other must be smeared in curry sauce and then drop it towards your new white settee.
Isn't that too strong a recipe, liable to introduce such a severe rotation that the wine and curry sauce are flung aside by the centripetal force and the effect fails?

im

34,302 posts

219 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
havoc said:
im said:
nono You need to douse one side of the cat in red wine and the other must be smeared in curry sauce and then drop it towards your new white settee.
Isn't that too strong a recipe, liable to introduce such a severe rotation that the wine and curry sauce are flung aside by the centripetal force and the effect fails?
scratchchin I rather suspect the cat would be torn apart by the 2 forces competing to land on the settee first.




Edited by im on Friday 26th April 23:09

Silent1

19,761 posts

237 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
KaraK said:
Salgar said:
A very old and very geeky joke.

I'd never seen it before:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carrier...
I still love the fact that someone actually implemented it hehe
It's been done a few times now, when done by a person it's often called 'sneakernet'.

Google use fedex to move data about and rather imaginatively call it FedExNet, they use it for starting up data centres and for importing data such as the hubble data dump.
It's going to be a long time before the internet beats couriers for data capacity, in fact i'm not sure if it ever will because if you include the data processing at each end it's pretty slow whereas if you ship a hard drive there is no import/export operation, hence why amazon offer a hard drive import/export service for their AWS.

ETA. Here's quite a good article on it actually
Actually this wired article provides a lot more detail about how they actually do it.

Edited by Silent1 on Friday 26th April 22:55

crmcatee

5,712 posts

229 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
I'm sure he could have chosen a better picture on that Wired writeup than his entry for the lonely hearts ad he took out.

CRA2Y

2,632 posts

207 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
So I was thinking, if this stupid science theory that suggests all possibilities of choice are played out in ever diverging dimensions, then surely if 1000 people apply for a ANY job, no matter what qualifications are required, in one dimension the least qualified nimnul will get the post. And then over a short period of time, there will be a dimension where they will not be passed over for promotion, and eventually get promoted to the top job, no matter how inept they are.

What kind of retarded ludicrous science would allow this? But then I thought back to all those managers & supervisors I'd encountered over the years, and then add those behind the banking crises, and there is but one conclusion - we are the most unfortunate people in the whole damn multiverse, and are living in that dimension...

Gwagon111

4,422 posts

163 months

Friday 26th April 2013
quotequote all
havoc said:
Isn't that too strong a recipe, liable to introduce such a severe rotation that the wine and curry sauce are flung aside by the centripetal force and the effect fails?
Purely for saying centripetal, rather than the ( wrong ) centrifugal force, I will have to agree hehe.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

263 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
Gwagon111 said:
havoc said:
Isn't that too strong a recipe, liable to introduce such a severe rotation that the wine and curry sauce are flung aside by the centripetal force and the effect fails?
Purely for saying centripetal, rather than the ( wrong ) centrifugal force, I will have to agree hehe.
Except that in this case it's the lack of centripetal force that's causing the mess. Centripetal force, if present, would prevent the wine and curry sauce being flung aside.

Mr MXT

7,695 posts

285 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
I remember sitting at school learning about Pavlov and thinking 'those stupid dogs'.

Then the bell went and we all had lunch.


Courtesy of Gary Delaney.

Gwagon111

4,422 posts

163 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Except that in this case it's the lack of centripetal force that's causing the mess. Centripetal force, if present, would prevent the wine and curry sauce being flung aside.
Very true yes.

samdale

2,860 posts

186 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
monthefish said:
Piersman2 said:
samdale said:
K12beano said:
a cat strapped to a buttered slice of toast!!!
The cat lands on it's feet. As the toast never hits the ground the "antigravity" theory doesn't apply. Unless of course you strap the toast to the cat's feet, butter side towards the feet.
The best way to make an anti gravitation perpetual motion machine is to strap the toast to the cat's back, butter side out.

This combination of cat and toast is unable to either land on it's feet or the buttered side of toast simultaneously and therefore must hover above the ground spinning between feet and butter... forever.
nono

Cat lands, toast never lands. End of.

K12beano

20,854 posts

277 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
samdale said:
monthefish said:
Piersman2 said:
samdale said:
K12beano said:
a cat strapped to a buttered slice of toast!!!
The cat lands on it's feet. As the toast never hits the ground the "antigravity" theory doesn't apply. Unless of course you strap the toast to the cat's feet, butter side towards the feet.
The best way to make an anti gravitation perpetual motion machine is to strap the toast to the cat's back, butter side out.

This combination of cat and toast is unable to either land on it's feet or the buttered side of toast simultaneously and therefore must hover above the ground spinning between feet and butter... forever.
nono

Cat lands, toast never lands. End of.
See, I always wondered if the disturbance in the space-time continuum wouldn't just vaporise the floor.......

Grenoble

51,028 posts

157 months

Saturday 27th April 2013
quotequote all
K12beano said:
See, I always wondered if the disturbance in the space-time continuum wouldn't just vaporise the floor.......
They would be eddies in the space-time continuum.

"I have detected," he said, "disturbances in the wash." …
"The wash?" said Arthur.
"The space-time wash," said Ford. …
Arthur nodded, and then cleared his throat. "Are we talking about," he asked cautiously, "some sort of Vogon laundromat, or what are we talking about?"
"Eddies," said Ford, "in the space-time continuum."
"Ah," nodded Arthur, "is he? Is he?" He pushed his hands into the pocket of his dressing gown and looked knowledgeably into the distance.
"What?" said Ford.
"Er, who," said Arthur, "is Eddy, then, exactly, then?"

Salgar

Original Poster:

3,283 posts

186 months

Sunday 28th April 2013
quotequote all
Grenoble said:
K12beano said:
See, I always wondered if the disturbance in the space-time continuum wouldn't just vaporise the floor.......
They would be eddies in the space-time continuum.

"I have detected," he said, "disturbances in the wash." …
"The wash?" said Arthur.
"The space-time wash," said Ford. …
Arthur nodded, and then cleared his throat. "Are we talking about," he asked cautiously, "some sort of Vogon laundromat, or what are we talking about?"
"Eddies," said Ford, "in the space-time continuum."
"Ah," nodded Arthur, "is he? Is he?" He pushed his hands into the pocket of his dressing gown and looked knowledgeably into the distance.
"What?" said Ford.
"Er, who," said Arthur, "is Eddy, then, exactly, then?"
Haha, I think I will read that again next, I haven't for about 10 years.

Morningside

24,113 posts

231 months

Sunday 5th May 2013
quotequote all

Mr MXT

7,695 posts

285 months

Sunday 5th May 2013
quotequote all
I downloaded a great picture of 2 horses on my 4G connection.

JonRB

75,204 posts

274 months

Sunday 5th May 2013
quotequote all
Mr MXT said:
I downloaded a great picture of 2 horses on my 4G connection.
Hmmm.
LTE... nope
EE... nope
3GPP... nope
IMT-Advanced... nope

Ok, I don't get it.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

257 months

Sunday 5th May 2013
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Hmmm.
LTE... nope
EE... nope
3GPP... nope
IMT-Advanced... nope

Ok, I don't get it.
A gee-gee is a horse, so 4 gees equals 2 horses?

Mr Happy

5,701 posts

222 months

Sunday 5th May 2013
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
JonRB said:
Hmmm.
LTE... nope
EE... nope
3GPP... nope
IMT-Advanced... nope

Ok, I don't get it.
A gee-gee is a horse, so 4 gees equals 2 horses?
That's as bad as "how do you spell hungry horse in 4 letters? - MTGG (empty gee gee)"
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED