911. Do People Actually Believe This S**t?
Discussion
The election is enabling Alex Jones to really ramp things up
The number of videos & broadcasts he is doing has increased & the technical production quality is better these days
This one could be destined to become one of his classics
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7J2N8iK8uoo
The number of videos & broadcasts he is doing has increased & the technical production quality is better these days
This one could be destined to become one of his classics
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7J2N8iK8uoo
vonuber said:
durbster said:
Engineer is a very loose term these days, not limited to those with an engineering qualification.
I know, and it fks me right off!vonuber said:
durbster said:
Engineer is a very loose term these days, not limited to those with an engineering qualification.
I know, and it fks me right off!Sadly, fk all I can do about the job title, won't let me change it.
Rollin said:
scherzkeks said:
jmorgan said:
But, but, free fall man.....
Real engineers said so.
Even the ones at NIST. Real engineers said so.
motorizer said:
ofcorsa said:
If you are going to the trouble of setting explosives to blow up a building. Why the Planes?
Also, why blow up the building in the first place?It never ceases to amaze me why so many people have heralded the information age, the freedom to express information and share with like minded, open minded (or more often empty minded) individuals. For every percentage point increase in the amount of data we have see a two fold decrease in accuracy and value to the extent that the truth will never out in a vast majority of cases.
I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
TedMaul said:
It never ceases to amaze me why so many people have heralded the information age, the freedom to express information and share with like minded, open minded (or more often empty minded) individuals. For every percentage point increase in the amount of data we have see a two fold decrease in accuracy and value to the extent that the truth will never out in a vast majority of cases.
I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
There is no conspiracy in freefall. In fact A&E does not push any theory of any kind. I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
Science is science.
scherzkeks said:
TedMaul said:
It never ceases to amaze me why so many people have heralded the information age, the freedom to express information and share with like minded, open minded (or more often empty minded) individuals. For every percentage point increase in the amount of data we have see a two fold decrease in accuracy and value to the extent that the truth will never out in a vast majority of cases.
I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
There is no conspiracy in freefall. In fact A&E does not push any theory of any kind. I'm sure some conspiracy theorists think they are adding value by challenging the accepted versions of events and whilst there are some instances of this being the case, in the vast majority it simply acts as a protective shield of bullst to disguise the actual truth, which, in many cases is just how it is reported in all its often unremarkable glory.
I can also see why some who are hugely emotionally impacted by events such as 911 would wish to find a deeper truth, something more robust to blame and something tangible to be held to account and I can see why others would prey on this need and keep wounds open for their own benefit, fame, glory and riches.
The bottom line is that some dreadful people did some dreadful things that day, driven by a perception that others had done dreadful things to them.
And I have a BSc in Engineering so it must be true
Science is science.
So how was the building prepared for demolition without some massive conspiracy?
(He won't answer)
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff