Katie Hopkins - vacuous moron

Katie Hopkins - vacuous moron

Author
Discussion

Randy Winkman

16,382 posts

190 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
wst said:
Vaud said:
I agree. I think she is more a Ann Coulter provocateur. Wrap up a (sometimes) cogent argument in borderline hate speech.
She wouldn't have coverage if she wasn't inflammatory. That's all she's after.
yes She wouldn't have a job if she wasn't.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all


Hard to believe she's only 42.

Ayahuasca

27,428 posts

280 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
I don't always agree with her, but I like her.


Ace-T

7,719 posts

256 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:


Hard to believe she's only 42.
Apparently she had major brain surgery to help cure her epilepsy about a year ago. Don't agree with the woman's views, but I would say she looks ok for a 42 year old having gone through that crap.

JuniorD

8,643 posts

224 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:


Hard to believe she's only 42.

SeeFive

8,280 posts

234 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
Funny how the Dianne Abbott thread got closed and this one is still running.

I am not suggesting that this should be closed - quite the contrary.

Jonmx

2,552 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th May 2017
quotequote all
I nearly ran her over outside Waitrose in Exeter last year. Would have made a few headlines if I'd hit her I'm sure. She's really rather normal in real life, almost as if she says the outrageous stuff to sell a few papers and get some money in the bank. Given that she has a couple of kids I wouldn't be quite so gobby if I were her. Having seen how the all loving and forgiving left wing behave in this country I'd be worried about them being put at risk. Although her house is rather nice, it's not exactly secure and the Mr Kipling fan club would have no issue holding a protest in her garden if they so wished.

AstonZagato

12,758 posts

211 months

Tuesday 9th May 2017
quotequote all
SeeFive said:
Funny how the Dianne Abbott thread got closed and this one is still running.

I am not suggesting that this should be closed - quite the contrary.
Has the Dianne Abbott one been deleted rather than closed? I don't see it anymore (though I am known for not seeing things that are right under my nose).

Vaud

50,790 posts

156 months

Tuesday 9th May 2017
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
Has the Dianne Abbott one been deleted rather than closed? I don't see it anymore (though I am known for not seeing things that are right under my nose).
Moved to the moderators area.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th May 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
AstonZagato said:
Has the Dianne Abbott one been deleted rather than closed? I don't see it anymore (though I am known for not seeing things that are right under my nose).
Moved to the moderators area.
Selfish gits....hehe

I see it was deleted by a staff member who's been here for seven months. He'd have a dicky fit if he looked back at threads from time gone by.

Looks like Haymarket has launched censorship now. RIP fun and chuckles.

ChemicalChaos

10,416 posts

161 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
I'm sure all of you will be rejoicing now:

https://order-order.com/2017/05/26/katie-hopkins-s...

However, as distasteful as her opinions are, this is becoming a very slippery slope of sacking people for having a non-PC opinion.

We should not censor debate - give bad ideas the rope to hang themselves in public scrutiny. That applies to batst leftist dribble as much as right wing fascist stuff, before anyone says I'm biased.

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

87 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
I'm sure all of you will be rejoicing now:

https://order-order.com/2017/05/26/katie-hopkins-s...

However, as distasteful as her opinions are, this is becoming a very slippery slope of sacking people for having a non-PC opinion.

We should not censor debate - give bad ideas the rope to hang themselves in public scrutiny. That applies to batst leftist dribble as much as right wing fascist stuff, before anyone says I'm biased.
Sigh.

She called for a final solution, nothing less than an appeal for genocide. No one is censoring debate but there is no such thing as unfettered free speech. If you don't believe me, then find the nearest policeman you can & call them a , then get back to us with how that worked out.

ChemicalChaos

10,416 posts

161 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
Ok, fair play - I obviously missed that one.....

Goaty Bill 2

3,427 posts

120 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
Any link to what the idiot actually said/wrote to get herself sacked?


Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

87 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
I hope the bedwetters don't forget she is still free to speak - just not as a paid presenter on LBC.


berlintaxi

8,535 posts

174 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
she didn't even have the courage of her convictions, posted on Twitter then edited it when challenged and claimed it was a typo.rolleyes

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

87 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
LBC is owned by Global radio, who wouldn't give a toss about a bunch hand wringing bleeding hearts whining on or a rabid damages hoover like Hopkins. If they've got rid, it will be either because they've calculated she's toxic to their brand or they've been told by the media buyers that the association can't go on.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
I'm sure all of you will be rejoicing now:

https://order-order.com/2017/05/26/katie-hopkins-s...

However, as distasteful as her opinions are, this is becoming a very slippery slope of sacking people for having a non-PC opinion.

We should not censor debate - give bad ideas the rope to hang themselves in public scrutiny. That applies to batst leftist dribble as much as right wing fascist stuff, before anyone says I'm biased.
Would you have described Hitler as non-PC?


ChemicalChaos

10,416 posts

161 months

Friday 26th May 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Would you have described Hitler as non-PC?
READ the post I made after that rolleyes