Match.com (Volume 6)

Match.com (Volume 6)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Shnozz

27,577 posts

273 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
NRS said:
Shnozz said:
Every time I click on this thread a small part of me dies.

The other part of me celebrates the fact that the competition is as truly hopeless as this thread suggests.
Apart from Tonker. And CB.
Oh I'm not deity level to the PH sycophants, make no mistake.

Fast Bug

11,779 posts

163 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
That's all very well and good for people who have a good physique naturally, but when one is cursed with a slow metabolism and a love of fine dining, along with a science degree and lack of money that makes long gym sessions impossible.... then what?
Comments like that make you sound like you're in your 40's or 50's.

And/or female.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,521 posts

182 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
NRS said:
Apart from Tonker. And CB.
Careful. This thread has certain certains...

One is that Matt will prove how wrong it can go, another is that sooner or later it turns into a CB circle-jerk, with all his mates telling the rest of us what a legend he is.

Council Baby

19,741 posts

192 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
NRS said:
Apart from Tonker. And CB.
I believe neither of us are on the market, purely acting in an advisory role at this moment in time.

Tonks being the wordsmith, welcome back fella thumbup

Council Baby

19,741 posts

192 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Careful. This thread has certain certains...

One is that Matt will prove how wrong it can go, another is that sooner or later it turns into a CB circle-jerk, with all his mates telling the rest of us what a legend he is.
Now here's the thing, there's nothing legendary about fking up numerous relationships, I've just been around the block far too many times to not know how to play the game.

Impasse

15,099 posts

243 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Sounds all a bit shallow and desperate to me.

Shnozz

27,577 posts

273 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Sounds all a bit shallow and desperate to me.
Perhaps. But a fact of life. Don't hate the players....

Impasse

15,099 posts

243 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Shnozz said:
Perhaps. But a fact of life. Don't hate the players....
It's not a fact of my life. Love me, love my faults - especially if I choose to wear shoes which don't cost £500 to a poxy restaurant. The past page or two has almost earned a mention in the cringe thread.

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

169 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
I've never given the soles of my shoes a second thought, that must be where I've been going wrong.

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

169 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
What about shoe laces? Don't tell me I can get shoes laces wrong as well

NRS

22,265 posts

203 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Careful. This thread has certain certains...

One is that Matt will prove how wrong it can go, another is that sooner or later it turns into a CB circle-jerk, with all his mates telling the rest of us what a legend he is.
I don't think any of the CB stuff is a circle-jerk, rather it just provides a bit of fun compared to ripping apart any profile that is shared (in almost all cases deserved)! Actually never had my one done, anyone want to have a go? It's in Norwegian unfortunately, but you can take the piss out of the pictures (album tab, naturally)!

https://sukker.no/profil/vis/577024/3asywh

Council Baby said:
NRS said:
Apart from Tonker. And CB.
I believe neither of us are on the market, purely acting in an advisory role at this moment in time.

Tonks being the wordsmith, welcome back fella thumbup
I heard they were trying to sign him up for the Daily Mail relationship column?

Impasse

15,099 posts

243 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you think I'm going to alter who I am just to impress a girl then you're mistaking me for a 17 year old lad. I wear the clothes I feel suit me, I select shoes which I find pleasing and have never spent more than £100 on a watch for myself.

But according to your criteria that makes me some sort of no-hope doofus destined to rediscover his virginity. Given the alternative you portray then I'm fine with that. In any potential future relationship I'm the prize and not the little yappy yes dog begging for approval from the pretty lady. If she wants to be with me then she'll have to meet my standards rather than me jumping through hoops to meet hers. If it's meant to be, then we'll meet somewhere in the middle. If not then I'd rather keep it in my pants than pretend to be something I'm not simply to have a story to impress gullible internet readers.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

241 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
I've never given the soles of my shoes a second thought, that must be where I've been going wrong.
Mine are memory foam, they're ace biggrin

RobinBanks

17,540 posts

181 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
A girl I saw on Tinder earlier listed one of her interests as 'squatting'.

I enjoy doing a dump or occupying buildings without permission as much as the next person, but to be enthusiastic about it seems a bit far.

br d

8,410 posts

228 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Always enjoy Tonkers posts but it's true this is sliding into the silly now, it's starting to sound like a Robert Elms article in The Face.

Impasse

15,099 posts

243 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
But of course she will have to suit me. Right now, I'm the important one. In future who knows, but I'm not going to alter anything about me now to suit someone I don't know or haven't even met on the off-chance some girl might deign me worthy. If they don't like who I am now chances are I won't like them anyway - but it would be their loss not mine.

In your recent advice all you've done is explain how someone should change everything to suit an as yet unknown another, just for the chance of sex. Is sex really so important to you that you'd advise being something you're not just for the chance of it? That doesn't sit right with me at all. What effort are these girls doing to ensure I find them attractive on all levels?

I enjoy relationships, I'm a very nice, considerate and loving person and any girl would be lucky to have me. But relationships (or even one night stands) have never defined me nor given me a validation of my self worth. That comes from who I am and who I am is what's on offer (if I choose to offer it), not some pseudo pastiche lifted from a Teen magazine.

Mobile Chicane

20,880 posts

214 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
br d said:
Always enjoy Tonkers posts but it's true this is sliding into the silly now, it's starting to sound like a Robert Elms article in The Face.
Quite.

While good shoes are always noted, sneering at someone else's lesser footwear just isn't polite.

These are the type of wimmins who turn into Bridezillas. I'm guessing that despite the model looks/figure, and telephone number salary she's still single.


soad

32,959 posts

178 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
That's all very well and good for people who have a good physique naturally, but when one is cursed with a slow metabolism and a love of fine dining, along with a science degree and lack of money that makes long gym sessions impossible.... then what?
Excuses, excuses...you don't need to become a full time gym rat.
Half an hour's cardio workout, followed by half an hour of iron pumping.
Split them in two - one for the morning, another for the afternoon.
Hardly difficult - you just have to make it happen (and motivate yourself). smile

ApOrbital

10,005 posts

120 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
Just do 80 press ups each morning not very bloody hard is it?

Chunkymonkey71

13,015 posts

200 months

Monday 5th January 2015
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
That's all very well and good for people who have a good physique naturally, but when one is cursed with a slow metabolism and a love of fine dining, along with a science degree and lack of money that makes long gym sessions impossible.... then what?
Matt- you don't have a science degree. Not until you finish your course.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED