A bit council (Vol 6)

A bit council (Vol 6)

Author
Discussion

Pit Pony

8,924 posts

123 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
nuyorican said:
Christ. Councils really do have money to burn don’t they. So this is what our astronomical bills get spent on. Is there any practical reason for doing this apart from petty vindictiveness.
I imagine they were given the option to pay the fee for a dropped kerb but refused. Given the impact on the property price people can be remarkably shortsighted.
Did the posts cost more than a dropped curb?

Mate of mine was having the road and pavement redone by council contractors, including digging up the curbs.

He went out every day to ask them if they needed a cup of tea, and then reminded them that there was a dropped curb outside his house.

119

7,134 posts

38 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Southerner said:
nuyorican said:
Christ. Councils really do have money to burn don’t they. So this is what our astronomical bills get spent on. Is there any practical reason for doing this apart from petty vindictiveness.
No I think the council are bang on! Why should a property owner be able to essentially steal a parking space without going through due process and, yes, paying whatever the fee is that everyone else who wishes to do so has to pay? It’s selfish tw@tishness of the highest order IMHO; sod em!
You think by installing a dropped kerb steals a parking space?

Would that be the space that the homeowner probably uses?

Southerner

1,475 posts

54 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
119 said:
You think by installing a dropped kerb steals a parking space?

Would that be the space that the homeowner probably uses?
An ‘authorised’ dropped kerb will presumably come with appropriate road markings, and a general acceptance that you can’t park on the road there. That is what it is, the council have installed it and the cost has been paid. What I think is f**king cheeky is sticking your car in the front garden and then maintaining an expectation that nobody will park outside your house, despite there being no dropped kerb, no associated road markings and no costs of doing it properly having been paid. No doubt accompanied by the usual ebay “No Parking” signs and general hostility towards anyone who dares to disregard it.

As for the idea that the homeowner usually parks outside their home, I assume you’ve never lived somewhere with woefully inadequate on-street parking? That is precisely why people try a cheeky ‘budget’ driveway conversion, and why the unauthorised denial of that parking space to everyone else is a bit of a p*sstake.

Roofless Toothless

5,773 posts

134 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
As soon as you apply to the council for a ‘dropped kerb’ you soon discover that it is officially known as a ‘crossover’. It is not just a matter of getting rid of an inconvenient bump up the kerbstone.

It costs thousands to do this, and not only for the physical labour and materials, but the searches that are made about the utilities that may be passing your house beneath the footpath, and if their conduits are robust enough to withstand vehicles driving over them. In my own case I recall they even contacted the utility companies for their future plans in the road. Both the town and county councils may become involved on matters of road safety and public amenity.

Driving merrily across the pavement may seem innocuous to some, but wait until you collapse a gas main or sewer pipe, and it won’t seem so funny having to fork out perhaps tens of thousands for the repair.

5s Alive

1,947 posts

36 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
As soon as you apply to the council for a ‘dropped kerb’ you soon discover that it is officially known as a ‘crossover’. It is not just a matter of getting rid of an inconvenient bump up the kerbstone.

It costs thousands to do this, and not only for the physical labour and materials, but the searches that are made about the utilities that may be passing your house beneath the footpath, and if their conduits are robust enough to withstand vehicles driving over them. In my own case I recall they even contacted the utility companies for their future plans in the road. Both the town and county councils may become involved on matters of road safety and public amenity.

Driving merrily across the pavement may seem innocuous to some, but wait until you collapse a gas main or sewer pipe, and it won’t seem so funny having to fork out perhaps tens of thousands for the repair.
I suspect they must build footpaths to a better standard than the roads around here. We had nearly a year of fully laden tipper trucks parking on them. Pavements are still fine but the access roads were mangled.

Had to ask one of them to stop using our shared courtyard as a turning space. The 20mm sharp gravel was getting completely chewed up. He seemed genuinely surprised that this was a problem!

Koyaanisqatsi

2,312 posts

32 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Straight out the bath to Sainsbury's


nuyorican

906 posts

104 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Southerner said:
No I think the council are bang on! Why should a property owner be able to essentially steal a parking space without going through due process and, yes, paying whatever the fee is that everyone else who wishes to do so has to pay? It’s selfish tw@tishness of the highest order IMHO; sod em!
How are they stealing a parking space? People can still park and block their drive unless there’s a dropped kerb. Unless I’m mistaken?

So even more shortsighted by the homeowner.

nuyorican

906 posts

104 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Southerner said:
An ‘authorised’ dropped kerb will presumably come with appropriate road markings, and a general acceptance that you can’t park on the road there. That is what it is, the council have installed it and the cost has been paid. What I think is f**king cheeky is sticking your car in the front garden and then maintaining an expectation that nobody will park outside your house, despite there being no dropped kerb, no associated road markings and no costs of doing it properly having been paid. No doubt accompanied by the usual ebay “No Parking” signs and general hostility towards anyone who dares to disregard it.

As for the idea that the homeowner usually parks outside their home, I assume you’ve never lived somewhere with woefully inadequate on-street parking? That is precisely why people try a cheeky ‘budget’ driveway conversion, and why the unauthorised denial of that parking space to everyone else is a bit of a p*sstake.
Aye, fair enough actually. I hadn’t considered antisocial roasters who think they own the street.

I’m not sticking up for the homeowners btw. You’re right, pure selfishness, fk them. I’m more annoyed about councils wasting money.

classicaholic

1,761 posts

72 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
nuyorican said:
Southerner said:
No I think the council are bang on! Why should a property owner be able to essentially steal a parking space without going through due process and, yes, paying whatever the fee is that everyone else who wishes to do so has to pay? It’s selfish tw@tishness of the highest order IMHO; sod em!
How are they stealing a parking space? People can still park and block their drive unless there’s a dropped kerb. Unless I’m mistaken?

So even more shortsighted by the homeowner.
On the other hand though, thats 2 cars off the street and space for other people to park, the council should encourage it rather than object all the time.

Strangely Brown

10,220 posts

233 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
As soon as you apply to the council for a ‘dropped kerb’ you soon discover that it is officially known as a ‘crossover’. It is not just a matter of getting rid of an inconvenient bump up the kerbstone.

It costs thousands to do this, and not only for the physical labour and materials, but the searches that are made about the utilities that may be passing your house beneath the footpath, and if their conduits are robust enough to withstand vehicles driving over them. In my own case I recall they even contacted the utility companies for their future plans in the road. Both the town and county councils may become involved on matters of road safety and public amenity.

Driving merrily across the pavement may seem innocuous to some, but wait until you collapse a gas main or sewer pipe, and it won’t seem so funny having to fork out perhaps tens of thousands for the repair.
If the council do all of the leg work regarding utilities under the pavement then you have a very accommodating council. When I applied for my crossover I had to do all of that work myself and then submit all of the paperwork to the council with the application. The work for installing the crossover also had to be done by a contractor registered with the council with all of the appropriate liability insurance in case they screwed up any of the utilities. It had to constructed to the council specifications and the pavement (the crossover itself) had to be suitably reinforced. It was anything but straightforward and was most certainly not cheap.
I can understand why people don't bother but yes, they will be in a world of hurt if there are problems later on.

Spare tyre

9,754 posts

132 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
My sister would do all the nice bits like the drive and lawn, but the dropped kerb? Na can still cope without that, besides there is never any money in the “boring pot” for things like that and tyres etc


I think a lot of people want stuff and settle for the minimum outlay as that’s best innit

That said, we had a house on an A road that didn’t have a drive, we installed the required turning for two cars and had to use the councils contractor for the kerb part, a load of traffic lights and all sorts of equipment was dropped off, but two fellas with a scabby old flat bed did the job without the lights, I’m sure it was in the region of 6k. Not small change, however I’d certainly not buy a house that had skimped on the bits you can see

Roofless Toothless

5,773 posts

134 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
Roofless Toothless said:
As soon as you apply to the council for a ‘dropped kerb’ you soon discover that it is officially known as a ‘crossover’. It is not just a matter of getting rid of an inconvenient bump up the kerbstone.

It costs thousands to do this, and not only for the physical labour and materials, but the searches that are made about the utilities that may be passing your house beneath the footpath, and if their conduits are robust enough to withstand vehicles driving over them. In my own case I recall they even contacted the utility companies for their future plans in the road. Both the town and county councils may become involved on matters of road safety and public amenity.

Driving merrily across the pavement may seem innocuous to some, but wait until you collapse a gas main or sewer pipe, and it won’t seem so funny having to fork out perhaps tens of thousands for the repair.
If the council do all of the leg work regarding utilities under the pavement then you have a very accommodating council. When I applied for my crossover I had to do all of that work myself and then submit all of the paperwork to the council with the application. The work for installing the crossover also had to be done by a contractor registered with the council with all of the appropriate liability insurance in case they screwed up any of the utilities. It had to constructed to the council specifications and the pavement (the crossover itself) had to be suitably reinforced. It was anything but straightforward and was most certainly not cheap.
I can understand why people don't bother but yes, they will be in a world of hurt if there are problems later on.
We had to supply a professional drawing with our application, which cost us, but the research was done by the councils, Essex and Chelmsford City. An approved contractor off the list, like you.

Rusty Old-Banger

4,233 posts

215 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
As soon as you apply to the council for a ‘dropped kerb’ you soon discover that it is officially known as a ‘crossover’. It is not just a matter of getting rid of an inconvenient bump up the kerbstone.

It costs thousands to do this, and not only for the physical labour and materials, but the searches that are made about the utilities that may be passing your house beneath the footpath, and if their conduits are robust enough to withstand vehicles driving over them. In my own case I recall they even contacted the utility companies for their future plans in the road. Both the town and county councils may become involved on matters of road safety and public amenity.

Driving merrily across the pavement may seem innocuous to some, but wait until you collapse a gas main or sewer pipe, and it won’t seem so funny having to fork out perhaps tens of thousands for the repair.
This is EXACTLY it.

(Highways engineer who deals with this crap every day)

There are other issues too - road classification, visibility to/from hazards, removal of on-road parking availability, suitability of off-road parking area (if it's too small to realistically park a car/van), if the house already has an access (separate in and outs are generally refused), all sorts of things.

Roofless, I think you are in my area so you may well be familiar with this guidance: https://www.essexhighways.org/applications/vehicle...

In my experience, it's about £3k to install a dropped crossing, so really not very much in the grand scheme of things. Break a utility and it can easily run to 6 figures to repair. I've just "paid" £400k to BT to lower a chamber in a footway, for example.

Edited by Rusty Old-Banger on Wednesday 22 May 14:22

Spare tyre

9,754 posts

132 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
I grew up here, always been the same



Here is a fknugget accessing it



They are not roads, but footpaths leading to a school.

People have removed the bollards then drive along the grass etc

I appreciate its a bit of an iffy area but two wrongs don’t make a right

-Cappo-

19,672 posts

205 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all

Rebew

157 posts

94 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Tim Cognito said:
I may have a tip for avoiding council on holiday - if you are going to somewhere all inclusive, and alcohol is not important to you, pick a resort where alcohol is not included.

We're away at the moment and barely anything has registered on the council radar, compared to where we went last year which was a hot bed of activity. I've concluded the decisive factor is that drinks aren't included here.
Another is to go somewhere that does not cater/advertise to English tourists. We are off to Formentera next week for the third time, originally suggested to us by a Majorcan friend and guests mostly seem to be Spanish or Italian. There are a few English guests but because it doesn't seem to have made it onto Jet2's radar yet we have not yet witnessed any councilness on previous trips.

The Russians we came across in Tunisia probably 10 years ago now on the other hand gave a whole new meaning to Council!!

Red9zero

7,164 posts

59 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Rebew said:
Tim Cognito said:
I may have a tip for avoiding council on holiday - if you are going to somewhere all inclusive, and alcohol is not important to you, pick a resort where alcohol is not included.

We're away at the moment and barely anything has registered on the council radar, compared to where we went last year which was a hot bed of activity. I've concluded the decisive factor is that drinks aren't included here.
Another is to go somewhere that does not cater/advertise to English tourists. We are off to Formentera next week for the third time, originally suggested to us by a Majorcan friend and guests mostly seem to be Spanish or Italian. There are a few English guests but because it doesn't seem to have made it onto Jet2's radar yet we have not yet witnessed any councilness on previous trips.

The Russians we came across in Tunisia probably 10 years ago now on the other hand gave a whole new meaning to Council!!
My fathers partner is rather council and has introduced him to the delights of the all inclusive holiday. He doesn't drink, so the free alcohol is a bit wasted on him (his partner drinks his share I gather though), but he drinks gallons of tea, which you have to pay for, much to his dismay laugh

paulw123

3,308 posts

192 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Dr Murdoch said:
Enfield Council in London take a fairly robust approach to driveways without a dropped kerb....

That's great. Wish they would do that round my way.

williamp

19,319 posts

275 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Reagrding dropped kerbs, when I was young my Dad told me they used a big lorry to squash the kerb. Presumably health n safety has put a stop to that...

By the way, how do we shoe-horn the latest socio-econimic group into the thread title

‘working class, benefit class, criminal class, and/or underclass’.

mickk

29,034 posts

244 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
You forgot 'No class'