Do womens hooters aid them hydrodynamically, swimming?
Do womens hooters aid them hydrodynamically, swimming?
Author
Discussion

wolfracesonic

Original Poster:

9,177 posts

156 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
I pondered this whilst recently watching the taut psychological thriller 'Piranha 3D' featuring the lovely Kelly Brook, and wondered if a large pair of hooters assist women to cleave through the water, working in a similar fashion to a ship's bulbous bow

So intrigued was I by this hypothesis, that I repeatedly had to watch the part where the aforementioned Miss Brook swims naked, looking keenly for any post mammary vortices. If my theory holds true, then it would take less energy for Miss Brook
to maintain a given speed in the pool than say Fearne Cotton. I throw the subject up for peer review


Edited by wolfracesonic on Thursday 19th December 21:22


Edited by wolfracesonic on Thursday 31st August 09:38

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
I'll need to go watch it and report back - please hold

Justaredbadge

37,069 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
The film "three" has more fascinating footage available for peer review.

It's also on YouTube in full.

jimmyjimjim

8,270 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
I remember reading somewhere, many years ago, the results of a study that indicated that a woman with a 38 D was handicapped by about 2 metres in a 100 metre race as a result of the extra drag.

Puggit

49,788 posts

277 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
please hold
That's your job when Kelly Brook is swimming naked, not mine nono

Ikemi

8,610 posts

234 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Surely larger breasts increase drag? Are there any professional-to-Olympic standard swimmers with large breasts?

Disco You

3,747 posts

209 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
wolfracesonic said:
I pondered this whilst recently watching the taut psychological thriller 'Piranha 3D' featuring the lovely Kelly Brook, and wondered if a large pair of hooters assist women to cleave through the water, working in a similar fashion to a ship's bulbous bow


So intrigued was I by this hypotheses, that I repeatedly had to watch the part where the aforementioned Miss Brook swims naked, looking keenly for any post mammary vortices. If my theory holds true, then it would take less energy for Miss Brook
to maintain a given speed in the pool than say Fearne Cotton. I throw the subject up for peer review
Great film. I don't recommend going to see it with your mother though... That was fun...

D4MJT

1,307 posts

187 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
wolfracesonic said:
I pondered this whilst recently watching the taut psychological thriller 'Piranha 3D'
roflroflroflrofl

MocMocaMoc

1,524 posts

170 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Girls are generally better swimmers than dudes as their larger bums pull their torso into a more streamlined state - us skinny arsed fellas tend to sink, creating drag.

They also have a more flexible 'kick', so their legs propel them a little better.

Or, so my swimming (triathlons - stop laughing) tells me.

I apparently have a good powerful and flexible kick, which leads me to believe my legs are gay.

Terminator X

20,441 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
TTIUWP mad

TX.

JuniorD

9,013 posts

252 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
MocMocaMoc said:
Girls are generally better swimmers than dudes as their larger bums pull their torso into a more streamlined state - us skinny arsed fellas tend to sink, creating drag.

They also have a more flexible 'kick', so their legs propel them a little better.
Yeah but they can't throw worth st hehe

Pints

18,451 posts

223 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
TTIUWP mad

TX.
What more did you want?

Brother D

4,417 posts

205 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Water is rather viscous, so the additional frontal area would be detrimental. The example of the bulbous bow comes into effect with regards the generated wave/surface and as mentioned assists in cancelling out the standing waves produced by the ships montion. Swimming fast is about keeping the top/frontal area travelling forward as small as possible to reduce the drag.

madbadger

11,752 posts

273 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Ikemi said:
Surely larger breasts increase drag? Are there any professional-to-Olympic standard swimmers with large breasts?
Increase drag, but also aid bouyancy.

LordLoveLength

2,336 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Oddly, out of the water the more streamlined ones offer the most resistance.

NRS

26,214 posts

230 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Brother D said:
Water is rather viscous, so the additional frontal area would be detrimental. The example of the bulbous bow comes into effect with regards the generated wave/surface and as mentioned assists in cancelling out the standing waves produced by the ships montion. Swimming fast is about keeping the top/frontal area travelling forward as small as possible to reduce the drag.
So it could be helpful when doing backcrawl (reducing bow waves created by the head and shoulders) but worse when on your front? biggrin

Pixel Pusher

10,404 posts

188 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Not sure about swimming, but on the aquatic theme, the fuller breast certainly is a benefit for motor boating.

Fishtigua

9,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Ones fitted at a later date always stand out.


northwest monkey

6,370 posts

218 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
wolfracesonic said:
So intrigued was I by this hypotheses, that I repeatedly had to watch the part where the aforementioned Miss Brook swims naked, looking keenly for any post mammary vortices. If my theory holds true, then it would take less energy for Miss Brook
to maintain a given speed in the pool than say Fearne Cotton. I throw the subject up for peer review
I think I know the part of the film you mean.

I'd like to see Brook/Cotton swimming in baby oil - purely to see if it makes them swim any faster as baby oil is slippier than water so in theory they would be faster.

Maybe one for a late night "Tomorrows World" experimentscratchchin

Hard-Drive

4,291 posts

258 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Ah, this is a question I have always pondered too. After many years sailing and generally faffing around in boats, I have concluded that a large set of bangers won't actually assist in swimming speed, however they do have a few other advantages. Primarily, a top-heavy lovely wading in chest deep water will clearly be more energy efficient and faster than a flat chested bloke, for the reasons mentioned above, and also a particularly well endowed lass will be able to detect when she is swimming in shallow water too.

A mate of mine works at the Wolfson unit...I'm sure we could ask the delectable Ms. Brook if she mind if we towed her up and down the test tank a few times whilst we, erm, observed laminar flow and boundary layer separation at varying Reynolds numbers. In other words, looked at her knockers.

Although I think some ship designers may have already had the same idea...



Edited by Hard-Drive on Thursday 19th December 18:37