New Horizons Mission to Pluto
Discussion
MiniMan64 said:
It messes with my head that something so small and so distant has so much going on with it.
The observable universe is about 93 billion light years across, it's a reasonable assumption that it's all teeming with "stuff going on". Pluto id currently about four and a half light hours away. Boggle away... Einion Yrth said:
"This doesn't look like Triton."
There goes Eric's favourite theory.
This is going to be interesting...
Yep - the joys of "finding things out", as Carl Sagan used to say. The chap did admit that many did think Pluto would be a lot like Triton - and from a distance it did. But close up it's a whole different place.There goes Eric's favourite theory.
This is going to be interesting...
Eric Mc said:
Einion Yrth said:
"This doesn't look like Triton."
There goes Eric's favourite theory.
This is going to be interesting...
Yep - the joys of "finding things out", as Carl Sagan used to say. The chap did admit that many did think Pluto would be a lot like Triton - and from a distance it did. But close up it's a whole different place.There goes Eric's favourite theory.
This is going to be interesting...
I think we can safely say that virtually every single time a probe has passed a planet or a moon for the first time, the images sent back have revealed worlds that hardly ever matched what had been anticipated.
I'm really looking forward to the rest of the images as they start flowing in.
I'm really looking forward to the rest of the images as they start flowing in.
jmorgan said:
MiniMan64 said:
The lack of impact craters is quite eerie!
It's going to be a busy 16 months for that team!
Ocean underneath, oozes up..........?It's going to be a busy 16 months for that team!
Either way - the surface looks geologically young from what we have seen so far. Interesting.
They discounted tidal effects of Charon at the press conference last night. Charon and Pluto are both tidally locked now so don't create any significant tides on each other.
At the moment they are at a bit of a loss to explain where internal heat might be being generated in either body. The other source of internal heat is radioactive decay and it is known now that Pluto is essentially a rocky body with ice deposits (rather than an icy body). You get radiocative decay with rocks - so the assumption at the moment is that it must be due to radioactive decay in the rocks. However, a lot more data will be needed before any consensus is arrived at.
All very fascinating.
At the moment they are at a bit of a loss to explain where internal heat might be being generated in either body. The other source of internal heat is radioactive decay and it is known now that Pluto is essentially a rocky body with ice deposits (rather than an icy body). You get radiocative decay with rocks - so the assumption at the moment is that it must be due to radioactive decay in the rocks. However, a lot more data will be needed before any consensus is arrived at.
All very fascinating.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff