Space Station Spotting

Space Station Spotting

Author
Discussion

moleamol

15,887 posts

265 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The photo on spaceweather.com by John Locker is amazing.
Really?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,216 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Well, I thought so.

central

16,744 posts

219 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Well, I thought so.
Seconded.

moleamol

15,887 posts

265 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
The gif of the space station fairly close up but really blurred?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,216 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Absolutely.

Don't forget it was over 200 miles above the observer at the time it was photographed. Do you think you would be able to take a recognisable picture of a doubledecker bus driving along in Brirmingham whilst you and your camera were in London?

Also, these pictures are being taken with amateur equipment. I have seen clearer pictures of the Shuttle and the Space Station taken from the ground but they were taken from observatories with much bigger and more sophisticated equipment.

central

16,744 posts

219 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Absolutely.

Don't forget it was over 200 miles above the observer at the time it was photographed. Do you think you would be able to take a recognisable picture of a doubledecker bus driving along in Brirmingham whilst you and your camera were in London?

Also, these pictures are being taken with amateur equipment. I have seen clearer pictures of the Shuttle and the Space Station taken from the ground but they were taken from observatories with much bigger and more sophisticated equipment.
yes

London - Manchester even.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Hells bells. I didn't scroll down. Great stuff. Shows what you can do. I haven't even tried to track it with my scope as I know I do not have much chance by hand. The other night I tried to get a shot of it passing but the FOV got me all wrong. So I tried the camera on a tripod and got the timing and I suspect ISO wrong. Still, practice makes perfect and all that.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The photo on spaceweather.com by John Locker is amazing.


These ones are great. Only a 4.5 inch telescope too.

Or here with an 8inch telescope.









Edited by stovey on Sunday 10th February 11:00

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
stovey said:
Eric Mc said:
The photo on spaceweather.com by John Locker is amazing.
Or here with an 8inch telescope.



Not forgetting that the image was gatherd by none other than the humble Phillips Toucan webcam......just goes to show you dont need to spend £££££££ for it to work..

http://www.megastronomy.150m.com/New-QCUIAG/

soz, wrong url first time

MoJo








Edited by Mojocvh on Sunday 10th February 11:42

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
When I get motored up then its a web cam. The examples of stacked images are stunning and there many.

Here is another cracking shot.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Excellent stuff (and a very good website if I remember correctly)

But the usual disclaimer of

DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME FOLKS

should apply as solar atronomy carries inherent risks and really should be left for those "in the know"

rgds

MoJo.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all




Fantastic.

Edited by stovey on Sunday 10th February 12:19

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Opsy. My bad, forgot the warning. Very important! Take heed of the message above.

dickymint

24,552 posts

260 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Excellent stuff (and a very good website if I remember correctly)

But the usual disclaimer of

DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME FOLKS

should apply as solar atronomy carries inherent risks and really should be left for those "in the know" and are already blind

rgds

MoJo.
EFA

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
redface

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,216 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Is that the "I didn't use a sun filter" smiley?

Simond001

4,518 posts

279 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Is trhe space staion etc still floating around for us to see.

Bought myself a Telescope after the October post, and never used it apart from looking at the moon for 2 minutes!


jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
An obvious one but I wonder how many went through the drill looking after their peepers and burnt the back of their heads with the finder scope.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,216 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Simond001 said:
Is trhe space staion etc still floating around for us to see.

Bought myself a Telescope after the October post, and never used it apart from looking at the moon for 2 minutes!
What do you think this thread is all about?

And you don't need a telescope. Eyeball is best.

oldskool

317 posts

232 months

Sunday 10th February 2008
quotequote all
Here's the ground track for tonight chaps... cameras/binoculars/tripods/eyeballs at the ready smile



Edited by oldskool on Sunday 10th February 14:03