SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 8th June 2021
quotequote all
xeny said:
annodomini2 said:
No header tanks for flip landing on superheavy.
That's a design decision that it isn't worth it - more slightly wondering why they made that decision.
Pretty sure it’s simply because it doesn’t need to. It’s not entering at orbital velocity (not even close) so they will perform an entry burn. The booster would need the 4 fins and header tanks (maybe even more RCS thrusters) to do a belly flop and flip landing. It would also need a heatshield. The actual exhaust plume of Falcon 9’s entry burn protects Falcoln 9 from re-entry heating.

annodomini2

6,874 posts

252 months

Tuesday 8th June 2021
quotequote all
F20CN16 said:
xeny said:
annodomini2 said:
No header tanks for flip landing on superheavy.
That's a design decision that it isn't worth it - more slightly wondering why they made that decision.
Pretty sure it’s simply because it doesn’t need to. It’s not entering at orbital velocity (not even close) so they will perform an entry burn. The booster would need the 4 fins and header tanks (maybe even more RCS thrusters) to do a belly flop and flip landing. It would also need a heatshield. The actual exhaust plume of Falcon 9’s entry burn protects Falcoln 9 from re-entry heating.
Lower speed = less heating

The first stage recovery has been well practiced with F9.

Header tanks, plumbing, valves etc all add complication which increase uncertainty.

As the old saying goes, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Tuesday 8th June 2021
quotequote all
Heat racks up a lot with velocity.

As I understand it, doubling the reentry velocity creates 4 times the energy, but 8 times the heat.

It's why the Falcon 9 second stage can't (economically at least) be recovered, but the first stage can.

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Friday 11th June 2021
quotequote all
Both recovered Falcon 9 boosters were in port together a couple of days ago:



B1061 on the left and the cleaner B1067 back after its first flight.


Of Course I Still Love You (OCISLY), the landing ship on the right has been offloaded and water pumped out to raise her higher in the water. It's now on the long trek over to California via the Panama Canal.



From SpaceXFleet


First it's a tow over to the Bahamas. There she'll be floated aboard the Mighty Servant 1, a semi-submersible vessel that's quite used to carrying much larger and bulkier cargos. This is her sistership the Mighty Servant 2, carrying the USS Samuel B. Roberts, an American frigate damaged by a mine in the Persian Gulf in 1988.



OCISLY is 170ft wide, but the Panama Canal is 161ft wide. Presumably onboard the Mighty Servant 1 she'll be stored high enough that she can pass through OK. Time is a factor here and however much it costs, it'll save the delay of having the wing extensions removed & then reattached like last time.



Edited by Beati Dogu on Friday 11th June 16:54

MartG

20,716 posts

205 months

Friday 11th June 2021
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Presumably onboard the Mighty Servant 1 she'll be stored high enough that she can pass through OK.
Could she be tilted to fit through ?

loudlashadjuster

5,192 posts

185 months

Friday 11th June 2021
quotequote all
MartG said:
Beati Dogu said:
Presumably onboard the Mighty Servant 1 she'll be stored high enough that she can pass through OK.
Could she be tilted to fit through ?
They can just fit a few Raptors and lift the whole shebang over the narrowest bits

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Friday 11th June 2021
quotequote all
MartG said:
Could she be tilted to fit through ?
I guess so. Kinda like moving a grand piano through a doorway. tongue out

I imagine there will be other cargo as well. There's plenty of room.

Hope it makes it. Mighty Servant 2 sank in 1999 off Indonesia with the loss of 5 crew. She was raised and scrapped. Mighty Servant 3 also sank in 200 ft of water due to a stuck valve while trying to lower herself under her cargo, a drilling platform. She was also raised, but put back into service.


Talksteer

4,921 posts

234 months

Friday 11th June 2021
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Beati Dogu said:
That was Apollo 4, the first flight of the Saturn V. The pad water suppression system wasn't ready yet, so it was much louder than subsequent launches.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uoVfZpx5dY


SpaceX isn't using water suppression either. Something they admit they may have to rethink. There's a bunch of condos about 6 miles from the launch pad at Boca Chica. Lots of glass doors and windows.
Are they not using suppression on the orbital mount? I know they aren't using it on the little test stand mounts, didn't realise they were going to try and get away with it on the orbital one too.
The tank for the orbital mount is on site now.

They don't have a diverter on the current mount but they do fire off a water hose just before they start the rocket.

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Monday 14th June 2021
quotequote all
They’ve obviously rethought their decision. Going with a big water tank and high pressure pumps instead of a ginormous water tower.

Meanwhile the big crane gib has been extended and they’ve started lifting further tower segments into place.





Pics: Cosmic Perspective

Edited by Beati Dogu on Monday 14th June 00:59

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Monday 14th June 2021
quotequote all
The next Falcon 9 launch is due this Thursday, June 17th from 5.09 pm UK time. There’s a 15 minute window for launch.

It’ll be carrying the GPS III-5 satellite “Neil Armstrong“ for the US Air Force.

It’s the first time the Air Force has agreed to a pre-flown booster for one of their satellites. The booster has flown once before and took up the GPS III-4 satellite last November.

annodomini2

6,874 posts

252 months

Wednesday 16th June 2021
quotequote all
Stacked another tower section and scrapping SN16

Dog Star

16,167 posts

169 months

Wednesday 16th June 2021
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Stacked another tower section and scrapping SN16
They must be ever so confident in the data that they’ve gained from the SN8-15 flights - I guess the only real point of failure has been Raptor relight?

CraigyMc

16,492 posts

237 months

Wednesday 16th June 2021
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
annodomini2 said:
Stacked another tower section and scrapping SN16
They must be ever so confident in the data that they’ve gained from the SN8-15 flights - I guess the only real point of failure has been Raptor relight?
It's just that SpaceX have a higher tolerance for failures in testing than anyone else. Why spend the time walking when you can run?
They aren't just building a rocket. They are building a rocket factory. Half the job is getting manufacturing to produce them like sausages.

annodomini2

6,874 posts

252 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
Correction, SN16 has been moved next to SN15 in the display area

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
And here they are:



Doesn’t look like SN16 will ever get to fly though. The partially built SN17 has already been scrapped. They’re concentrating on the booster and SN20 now. They obviously feel they learned enough from SN15’s flight to skip to the next iteration.

SN15 and 16 will make a nice backdrop to Elon’s presentation, which is supposed to be happening sometime. I expect after the big test flight in July.

Dog Star

16,167 posts

169 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
That was the best landing footage I’ve seen yet. cool

Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
Yes, a bit of lag between the feeds, but no picture break up.

From 28 minutes in:

https://youtu.be/QJXxVtp3KqI

Any landing a rocket can walk away from is a good landing I guess.

The GPS satellite was dropped off ok later on as well.


Beati Dogu

8,920 posts

140 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
Ey up….

“We might use SN16 on a hypersonic flight test” - Elon


kuro

1,621 posts

120 months

Thursday 17th June 2021
quotequote all
Damn, I missed the live feed earlier but just caught the replay. Amazing footage of the landing from jrti.

MartG

20,716 posts

205 months

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED