The Official 2016 Spanish Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

The Official 2016 Spanish Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

Author
Discussion

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

100 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
sanf said:
lord summerisle said:
Adrian W said:
Rosberg knew exactly what he was doing, fiddle with knob, look in mirror, see Hamilton, turn right.

http://int.search.myway.com/search/video.jhtml?sea...

I think that if they had been in different teams Rosberg would have got a penalty, the stewards took the view that the whole team had already been punished.
From Autosports reporting: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/124305...

Rosberg said:
"Coming out of Turn 3 I noticed I was down on engine power, which in hindsight is because I was in an incorrect mode.

"The way for me to get more engine power is from my overtake button. You will see from the on-board I was pushing that, and I don't need to look where that is because I use it very, very often and I know where it is - top left-hand corner

"I saw Lewis closing in, and as soon as I could I closed the door. I covered the inside with a clear, strong move to make sure he understood there would not be space there.

"That's what you do, you close the inside door to make sure he doesn't get by.

"I was well aware of where he was at all times, and fully present to the battle. I was fully concentrated on Lewis.

"I was very surprised he went for it anyways, and that's it, we ended up in the gravel trap."
Sitting here and watching some of the analysis again. What Rosberg has said above isn't quite correct, before pressing the overtake button, he moves his left hand off the steering wheel and changes the engine mode knob....then he presses the overtake button - by which time Hamilton has started his move.

I like the way drivers only remember the bits they want to make themselves feel better. Or alternatively he was so maxed out changing settings that he's forgotten that he did that!! With so much on car analysis, drivers really should check the detail of their statements.
That is, from what I have seen, spot on. Sheer, near panic driven, desperation to prevent being passed.

NJK44

1,364 posts

98 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
That is, from what I have seen, spot on. Sheer, near panic driven, desperation to prevent being passed.
I genuinely believe he had no right to defend, if having problems with your car.

HustleRussell

24,792 posts

162 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
In which case, the question must be what constitutes a 'problem' with the car? Nico was in the wrong mode, the car was fine.

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

173 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
I would like to add my appreciation of the analysis you are doing and the thread opening. It would be great if you are able / have time to do some analysis on the long runs in FP2. The media concentrate on fastest lap when it is number of laps and lap average which gives a much better guide to race performance through tyre deg. SKY sometimes mention it but C4 have yet to think about it.

Perhaps other have similar issues, but the graphics on the opening page take ages to load in my 3-year old iPad, I think it is to do with jpgs of very different sizes.
Cool, will do more analyses if feeling inspired to do. Incidentally, I noticed C4 analyst Karun up to plotting some long runs after FP2 and posted it on twitter, but they didn't talk about it on-air I think?

Re: the pics, I think after the Red Bull switch the updated jpeg for the tyre allocation was a large file, it sometimes takes a while for me too. I will try to find smaller jpegs in the future if possible. smile

EagleMoto4-2 said:
I read on the BBC website that Hamilton's pole lap astounded everyone in the pitlane. Was it really that good or was Benson blowing smoke up Hammy's arse again?
I was more impressed with the first run where he locked up to be honest. That was shaping up to be an epic lap and I remember thinking, here comes the pole lap as it was unfolding. Then, a crack appeared and I had flashes of 2014.

NJK44

1,364 posts

98 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
In which case, the question must be what constitutes a 'problem' with the car? Nico was in the wrong mode, the car was fine.
The car is fine. The problem is Nico laugh

glazbagun

14,309 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
NJK44 said:
I genuinely believe he had no right to defend, if having problems with your car.
You can't believe this, surely. Saying he defended badly is one thing, but saying he shouldn't be allowed to defend because his car lost horsepower for a few seconds?

Guys fighting it out in a dying car is one of the great spectacles of F1 when they can manage it. What do you think of Schumacher's incredible second place in Spain '95, where he drove 2/3rds of the race on one gear? Or any race that Alonso or Button had last year- should they have just pulled aside as though blue flagged? Or Hamilton finishing at Russia with his car in bits?


angrymoby

2,622 posts

180 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
You can't believe this, surely. Saying he defended badly is one thing, but saying he shouldn't be allowed to defend because his car lost horsepower for a few seconds?

Guys fighting it out in a dying car is one of the great spectacles of F1 when they can manage it. What do you think of Schumacher's incredible second place in Spain '95, where he drove 2/3rds of the race on one gear? Or any race that Alonso or Button had last year- should they have just pulled aside as though blue flagged? Or Hamilton finishing at Russia with his car in bits?
or Schumacher's incredible defence with knackered suspension in '94 wink

Maybe it's a German thing? wink


Edited by angrymoby on Tuesday 17th May 13:27

glazbagun

14,309 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
angrymoby said:
or Schumacher's incredible defence with knackered suspension in '94 wink

Maybe it's a German thing? wink


Edited by angrymoby on Tuesday 17th May 13:27
hehe Although I still havent forgiven Schumacher for that, reviewing the incident after this race led me to an interview right after with Damon where he pretty much says "that's racing". It's what I thought when I saw Bamilton covering his face. I don't think he was thinking "I've been robbed" but rather "If only I'd played it safer!"

I can still remember hill sitting in the pits staring at his broken suspension arm while Schumacher contemplated the loss of his WDC thanks to one corner. Also, if people think the gap between front runners is too high now, they would have hated the 90's! The Spanish GP I referred to above (was 94, not 95) had everyone lapped up to 4th!

angrymoby

2,622 posts

180 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
hehe Although I still havent forgiven Schumacher for that, reviewing the incident after this race led me to an interview right after with Damon where he pretty much says "that's racing". It's what I thought when I saw Bamilton covering his face. I don't think he was thinking "I've been robbed" but rather "If only I'd played it safer!"

I can still remember hill sitting in the pits staring at his broken suspension arm while Schumacher contemplated the loss of his WDC thanks to one corner. Also, if people think the gap between front runners is too high now, they would have hated the 90's! The Spanish GP I referred to above (was 94, not 95) had everyone lapped up to 4th!
without veering completely off topic, i was actually warming to Schumi up until that point ...as he was clearly head & shoulders above the rest (now minus Senna) & exactly the level of skill & aggression you want from a WDC ...& that's the annoying/exacerbating thing about him, he just didn't need to do the things he did, as he was that good & imo would've been rated THE 'greatest' even minus a couple of WDC's- if only he hadn't have stooped that low.

Saying that, Nico's not in the same league (both in talent or malevolence)

Flipatron

2,089 posts

200 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Other have said if it had happened the other way round we'd all be bhing about Nico trying to overtake in desperation. I disagree. If Lewis had swung wildly off the racing line and put Nico on the grass I'd be the first to blame Lewis.

I'm also staggered as to the 50:50 blame, Lauda and Stewart comments. What the hell was Lewis suppose to do, just hang back even though he had a massive speed advantage over Nico? Everyone seems to be saying he should've expected Nico to defend wildly and just sit behind him.

100% Nico's fault IMO.

Zad

12,717 posts

238 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
100% both their faults in my view. Possibly 60/40 in proportion, the cause and outcome is the same. Both had an opportunity to back out of it but chose not to. Both made mistakes of judgement and selective memory, all mixed up with a splash of red mist. There is a philosophy that only one person can be to blame for things, in the real world things are rarely so clear cut.


Gary C

12,628 posts

181 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Still, it was nico's cockup that caused it what ever way you look at it.

ajprice

27,838 posts

198 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all

FreiWild

405 posts

158 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Guess Hamilton will think twice next time.

jbudgie

8,990 posts

214 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
FreiWild said:
Guess Hamilton will think twice next time.
You guess wrong.

jbudgie

8,990 posts

214 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Exactly , that shows all that's needed.

jbudgie

8,990 posts

214 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Smollet said:
How's about this for a tinfoil hat theory. Hamilton now realising this year's title is looking more likely to go to Britney he will do his utmost to scupper his chances thus giving the title to a rival team denying Rosberg of it roflrofl
A theory too far, I think.

deadslow

8,061 posts

225 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
FreiWild said:
Guess Hamilton will think twice next time.
if he's got any brains yes

NRS

22,298 posts

203 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
jbudgie said:
Smollet said:
How's about this for a tinfoil hat theory. Hamilton now realising this year's title is looking more likely to go to Britney he will do his utmost to scupper his chances thus giving the title to a rival team denying Rosberg of it roflrofl
A theory too far, I think.
Way too many races to go for that, and even if a driver would do that (which they wouldn't) then it would be very obvious over the season what they were doing and thus they'd probably struggle to get a job again if they destroyed the season for their team. The only thing that might have happened is Hamilton "trying" to take out Rosberg once it was clear he was not going to complete the race while crashing. Even then it's not too likely due to being on the grass and so pretty much being a passenger at that point.

FourWheelDrift

88,757 posts

286 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Hamilton wants the Ferrari drive so he can try and to go for 3 WCs in 3 different teams.