What's the difference between a V6 and and normal engine?

What's the difference between a V6 and and normal engine?

Author
Discussion

alfabadass

Original Poster:

1,852 posts

201 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
I'm going to get labelled a n00b here but I've been looking at cars on trader for ages including the tech specs and stuff but cannot really see a lot of difference in speed between for instance a BMW 3 series 330 "straight 6" or a Jag X type 3.0 V6. In fact the straight 6 seems better.

So what's all the hype with V6's or indeed V8 and V12... although I've never heard of a Straight 8 or 12. Some V6 engines seem pathetic as well eg the Hyundai V6 Coupe.


matt uk

17,786 posts

202 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
The 'V' or straight is the engine cylinder configuration

tomTVR

6,909 posts

243 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
If they make a straight 12 then sign me up.

miniman

25,204 posts

264 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Lots of info here:

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/engine9.htm

There are certainly Straight 8 engines around, very old ones though. V engines are inherently smoother than straight engines because they are better balanced, with the exception of the Straight 6 (BMW being the biggest manufacturer of these) which is inherently well balanced.

Balmoral Green

41,111 posts

250 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
tomTVR said:
If they make a straight 12 then sign me up.
Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C

miniman

25,204 posts

264 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C
That's easy for you to say hehe

Actually, I'm sure that's the name of the dinner lady at my primary school scratchchin

Mark-C

5,248 posts

207 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
tomTVR said:
If they make a straight 12 then sign me up.
Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C
Details here --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rtsil%C3%A4-Su...

Wouldn't normally go to Wikipedia for "facts" but those are some big numbers

Edited by Mark-C on Tuesday 18th November 19:30


Edited by Mark-C on Tuesday 18th November 19:31

MrKipling43

5,788 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
Balmoral Green said:
tomTVR said:
If they make a straight 12 then sign me up.
Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rtsil%C3%A4-Sulzer_RTA96-C

Wouldn't normally go to Wikipedia for "facts" but those are some big numbers
Yeah, well my R firty four Skahline GTR puts out 111,000bhp and it's on standard internals.

wildoliver

8,834 posts

218 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
miniman said:
V engines are inherently smoother than straight engines because they are better balanced
Total rubbish. Couldn't be more wrong. Straight engines are the smoothest V engines are inherently out of balance.

Gad-Westy

14,692 posts

215 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Essentially its the 'shape' of the engine. Most engines in mainstream cars are an in-line four, or straight four, i.e four cylinders in a row. I can't think of a current V4 but they exist and are popular in the biking world as well. They are essentially two pairs of cylinders opposite each other, rather than four in a line. So a V6 vs. straight 6 is the same, either 6 in a line or 2 pairs of three opposite each other. A straight six 'should' be smoother but is obviously 6 cylinders long and so is a very long engine. A V6 is only 3 cylinders long but is wider that a straight 6. Generally speaking, a V6 will be more compact. There should be no real reason why one configuration should be more powerful than another though they sound subtly different.

ETA, should have said that the V refers to the fact that the cylinder banks are leant over in relation to each other. Simplistically, if they're banked over at 180 degrees, you have a flat engine or a 'boxer' engine.

Edited by Gad-Westy on Tuesday 18th November 19:36

Chris71

21,536 posts

244 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
wildoliver said:
miniman said:
V engines are inherently smoother than straight engines because they are better balanced
Total rubbish. Couldn't be more wrong. Straight engines are the smoothest V engines are inherently out of balance.
Didn't Porsche go to great lengths to provide balancer shafts for its large inline fours?

hackett

493 posts

213 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
I owned a BMW 328 straight 6 then went onto a vectra GSI which is a 2.5 V6. I know the BMW was slightly bigger but it felt like it had a lot more low end torque and i think this is a generic trait of the "straight" engine. They are also really smooth as the firing sequence is very close so one piston fires very soon after the last in laymans terms.

I'm sure those links will explain it better but thought i'd comment as i've owned both.

(also owned a Range rover V8 but we won't go there ......ever againfurious)

VetteG

3,236 posts

246 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Gad-Westy said:
Essentially its the 'shape' of the engine. Most engines in mainstream cars are an in-line four, or straight four, i.e four cylinders in a row. I can't think of a current V4 but they exist and are popular in the biking world as well. They are essentially two pairs of cylinders opposite each other, rather than four in a line. So a V6 vs. straight 6 is the same, either 6 in a line or 2 pairs of three opposite each other. A straight six 'should' be smoother but is obviously 6 cylinders long and so is a very long engine. A V6 is only 3 cylinders long but is wider that a straight 6. Generally speaking, a V6 will be more compact. There should be no real reason why one configuration should be more powerful than another though they sound subtly different.
Well put Sir!

G

Mark-C

5,248 posts

207 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
wildoliver said:
miniman said:
V engines are inherently smoother than straight engines because they are better balanced
Total rubbish. Couldn't be more wrong. Straight engines are the smoothest V engines are inherently out of balance.
Wouldn't a radial be smoothest?

No thought has gone into this question ... it's just gut feel .... and obviously a radial isn't much use in a car, although I bet some nutter genius in a shed has done it.

Mars

8,792 posts

216 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Boxers are the smoothest, inherently.

tomTVR

6,909 posts

243 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
tomTVR said:
If they make a straight 12 then sign me up.
Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C
Hmmm might mess up the weight distribution a tad.

absolutely

3,168 posts

194 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
alfabadass said:
although I've never heard of a Straight 8
Dad raced a Railton Straight 8, it sounded like a silenced Spitfire when it drove past. Terrible overheating problems though! We built a new body for it.

tomTVR

6,909 posts

243 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It's not. Common misconception to be fair.

miniman

25,204 posts

264 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
wildoliver said:
miniman said:
V engines are inherently smoother than straight engines because they are better balanced
Total rubbish. Couldn't be more wrong. Straight engines are the smoothest V engines are inherently out of balance.
Your source?

Admittedly this is just Wikipedia but if you like I'll dig out something more "credible"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_balance

wikipedia said:
More than two cylinders

The number of possible configurations with more than two cylinders is enormous. See articles on individual configurations listed in Category:Piston engine configurations for detailed discussions of particular configurations.

There are four different forces and moments of vibration that can occur in an engine design: free forces of the first order, free forces of the second order, free moments of the first order, and free moments of the second order. The straight-6, flat-6, and V12 designs have none of these forces or moments of vibration, and hence are the naturally smoothest engine designs. (See the Bosch Automotive Handbook, Sixth Edition, pages 459-463 for details.)

Engines with particular balance advantages include:

* Straight-6
* Flat-6
* Flat-12
* V12

Engines with characteristic problems include:

* Flat-4 boxer and straight-4 have no better kinetic energy balance than a single, and require a relatively large flywheel.
* Crossplane V8, which requires a very heavily weighted crankshaft, and has unbalanced firing between the cylinder banks (producing the distinctive and much-loved V8 "burble").
* Flatplane (180° offset crankshaft) V8.

In modern multi-cylinder engines, many inherent balance problems are addressed by use of balance shafts. Tear is reduced only when the crankshaft is partly balanced before it touches any bearing as it is done in the flat and the V-engines. A balancer shaft transfers its force via bearings onto the crankshaft and rather increases tear.

LikesBikes

1,439 posts

238 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all

I'm ready to be told I'm wrong here, but I believe an in-line 6 would have more torque than an equivelent V6 thanks to its longer and thus heavier crankshaft?