RE: Alfa Romeo 4C spied testing

RE: Alfa Romeo 4C spied testing

Author
Discussion

AutoMobile

2 posts

156 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all

That's photo above is taken from quite an unflattering angle, this is much better -


Amirhussain

11,490 posts

165 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
AutoMobile said:
That's photo above is taken from quite an unflattering angle, this is much better -

That looks gorgeous

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
There's too much metal (or possibly carbon fibre) above the front wheels and the shoulder line is too high as it approaches the cabin. it could look really delicate and swoopy if that was sorted out, but as it is it looks like an Elise that ate too many pies and the Elise was hardly a pretty car to begin with.

The bonnet line and front overhang makes it look almost as if it has been designed to take a front-mounted transverse engine.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 16th January 23:08

Strawman

6,463 posts

209 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
The curve of the front windscreen and cabin area remind me a bit of the (Lancia) Stratos


Hackney

6,871 posts

210 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
Got a call last night from someone at Alfa and later on received my order form. I have allocation no. 10 apparently, not sure if it's with that dealer or nationally.

I've got my car up for sale at the moment and given future plans a 2 seater sports car is the last thing we need....but......that's a conversation with my wife that I'm really looking forward to.

biggrin

DJRC

23,563 posts

238 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
There's too much metal (or possibly carbon fibre) above the front wheels and the shoulder line is too high as it approaches the cabin. it could look really delicate and swoopy if that was sorted out, but as it is it looks like an Elise that ate too many pies and the Elise was hardly a pretty car to begin with.

The bonnet line and front overhang makes it look almost as if it has been designed to take a front-mounted transverse engine.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 16th January 23:08
There isnt Kam. Looks wise this thing is beyond pretty much dispute. It blows everything else small and coupeish out of the water, mid or front engined. Its in a different league to everything else out there. Its looks are in no way shape or form its problem.

Its how Alfa are going to manage to fk it up thats the problem. In the Uk this thing will not come in under £40k. The odds are it will be £45k and the odds say that will be 260ish PS with a GTA at 300 ponies and £55k.

That is a hell of an ask, the same one Lotus are targetting with the V6 Exige, but that is packing 350 ponies from the start. The Alfa will be selling on its looks alone.

Boydie88

3,283 posts

151 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
AutoMobile said:
That's photo above is taken from quite an unflattering angle, this is much better -


C36 Nico

753 posts

139 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
I think it looks a bit bloated designwise... the 8C is way prettier.

pits

6,429 posts

192 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
How long has it been since Alfa made a car unpleasing to the eye? 166 maybe, struggling to think of any other Alfas that are offensive to look at.

Just stunning.

C36 Nico

753 posts

139 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
I think someone else on here posted it, but it was spot on.

Basically, you wont get BOTH a carbon tub and a shexy engine for 50 grand.
Basically to get the price down this far, you have to settle for less of a bespoke engine effort.
the 1750 CCM engine might not make your eyes well up, but it does the job and if you can get a sub-1000 kilo CT-frame car
for the pricepoint targetted, then thats a very fair tradeup.

And with a turbocharged engine who is very tunable, I can see this car go like shi.t off the proverbial...
Imagine a stage-2 kit from Aftermarket tuners offering 340-350 bhp in a 850 kilo car?

Cant see many if any cars keeping up with that up some twisty alps... wink

ZesPak

24,450 posts

198 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
pits said:
How long has it been since Alfa made a car unpleasing to the eye? 166 maybe, struggling to think of any other Alfas that are offensive to look at.

Just stunning.
Indeed, the MiTo looks akward from some angles but on the whole it looks great, as does the Giulietta. The 159 is still one of the best looking small sedans and breaks ever made imho (but I'm biased wink). The Brera and Spider have great road presence, and a menacing face. I even like the look of the 166, not by any stretch a bad looking car imho, especially next to the competition in it's class. 156, 147, I think, for me, I'd have to look before those (155 & 145) to find something that isn't looking great.

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Looks wise this thing is beyond pretty much dispute. It blows everything else small and coupeish out of the water, mid or front engined. Its in a different league to everything else out there. Its looks are in no way shape or form its problem.
Each to their own. I personally think it looks worse overall than the Exige, and I'm not particularly keen on the Exige's looks.

If it's better looking than most small coupes out there, it's only because the other small coupes out there are awful.

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
pits said:
How long has it been since Alfa made a car unpleasing to the eye? 166 maybe, struggling to think of any other Alfas that are offensive to look at.
Brera. There haven't been many though. smile

ZesPak

24,450 posts

198 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
Brera. There haven't been many though. smile
Like I posted earlier, the brera is very wide and imho has a lot of road presence. Too bad it's a mortally unpractical car, FWD and overpriced, otherwise I'd have one in a heartbeat.

Don't forget what it's competing with:



kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
kambites said:
Brera. There haven't been many though. smile
Like I posted earlier, the brera is very wide and imho has a lot of road presence. Too bad it's a mortally unpractical car, FWD and overpriced, otherwise I'd have one in a heartbeat.

Don't forget what it's competing with:


The TT is a lovely looking car. The Brera is a bloated shapeless blob with some (admittedly very) pretty detailing around the lights. The Spider isn't bad because it loses the awful rear part of the roof-line.

Possibly the worst looking Alfa since the Arna, IMO. Such a shame because the original concept was stunning, not that they really shared anything except the name and a few little styling cues.

ETA: I don't think this (the 4C) is ugly though, just a bit shapeless and blobby.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 17th January 09:10

nickfrog

21,373 posts

219 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
C36 Nico said:
Imagine a stage-2 kit from Aftermarket tuners offering 340-350 bhp in a 850 kilo car?
It'd be great but I doubt it'd very reliable. This is the power that was extracted out of a 1.8T in a Formula Palmer Audi race car up to 3 years ago, but only in "push to pass" mode, as it was 300hp as standard. The engine was (eventually) very reliable but used in low mileage / high maintenance race environment, with proper warm ups and cool down procedures and bespoke cooling. Added cooling in the mid-engine Alfa would be a bit of a challenge. I can't see that kind of bhp/litre working on a road car but I am no engineer.

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
C36 Nico said:
Imagine a stage-2 kit from Aftermarket tuners offering 340-350 bhp in a 850 kilo car?
It'd be great but I doubt it'd very reliable. This is the power that was extracted out of a 1.8T in a Formula Palmer Audi race car up to 3 years ago, but only in "push to pass" mode, as it was 300hp as standard. The engine was (eventually) very reliable but used in low mileage / high maintenance race environment, with proper warm ups and cool down procedures. I can't see that kind of bhp/litre working on a road car but I am no engineer.
It's not all that unusual to see Audi powered Elises running of the order of 350bhp perfectly reliably. I don't know much about the Fiat engine, but know of no reason it shouldn't cope with enough fettling? Not sure how drivable a 200bhp/litre turbocharged engine would be in this sort of car, though.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

250 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
DJRC said:
Looks wise this thing is beyond pretty much dispute. It blows everything else small and coupeish out of the water, mid or front engined. Its in a different league to everything else out there. Its looks are in no way shape or form its problem.
Each to their own. I personally think it looks worse overall than the Exige, and I'm not particularly keen on the Exige's looks.

If it's better looking than most small coupes out there, it's only because the other small coupes out there are awful.
I agree...The need and want to like this is almost overwhelming, but if a car has to be viewed by a specific and particular angle to appeal, then sorry, it's not working properly as a 'whole'. To me it has many many beautiful bits of design work, the sad fact is that as beautiful pieces they only work if applied sparingly, not all thrown at the same car with no thought of proportion or restraint.
Reminds me of the Fiat Coupe, some great detailing and a great idea, but in reality the proportioning was all wrong and it became a mass of lovely details rather than a homegeonous beauty.

The 4C treads a path between a Lotus an a Mito...aesthetcially it's marmite (which is no bad thing! smile )...as for pricing and weight and stuff, I can't wait to see and read aboutt he truth...

C36 Nico

753 posts

139 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
It'd be great but I doubt it'd very reliable. This is the power that was extracted out of a 1.8T in a Formula Palmer Audi race car up to 3 years ago, but only in "push to pass" mode, as it was 300hp as standard. The engine was (eventually) very reliable but used in low mileage / high maintenance race environment, with proper warm ups and cool down procedures and bespoke cooling. Added cooling in the mid-engine Alfa would be a bit of a challenge. I can't see that kind of bhp/litre working on a road car but I am no engineer.
The Audi TT RS has 335 bhp stock, aftermarket tuners are offering 430-500 bhp stage tunings...
If this is 250-300bhp as standard, 350 should be no problem.

FlavaDave

213 posts

161 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
k-ink said:
El Capitano said:
That does look rather fussy and lumpy. I hope the final car is a lot more fluid and easier on the eye. I desperately want to love this...
Terrible photoshop work on that ^