RE: PDK-only for next Porsche 911 GT3?

RE: PDK-only for next Porsche 911 GT3?

Author
Discussion

mogjay

31 posts

149 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
301 said:
Sorry youre all wrong, bog standard carrera manual, its all you need.
But then you'd look you know nothing of sports cars and bought the default option like all the other accountants

mcx27

60 posts

150 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Is it fair to assume that most people on here have not driven a pdk 991? I had a 997.1 for 7 years (manual) and drove a 991 c2s in Jan... pdk was really really good. Faster, more efficient, blipped on down changes, allowed much more concentration on bumpy b roads. I have been a big fan of manual boxes, bought a 1m a few months ago, but don't knock it 'til you've tried it.

LindsayMac

569 posts

204 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Again many posters getting performance confused with driving pleasure.

Still on a positive not maybe it will slow the depreciation on my GT3 :-)

I have had the best of Double Clutch gearboxes, (Gtr R35) and but my experience with the GT3 although slightly slower (till the g/box on the R35 overheats) is much more exciting than pulling a paddle and you get your next gear if the computers allow!


PORK CHOP

20 posts

205 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Being the proud owner of a Gen2 997 GT3 I have already put my name down on the 991 GT3 but if it is PDK
the order will be cancelled. Tragic!

301

5 posts

221 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
How many 911s have you owned

Gary C

12,610 posts

181 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Atomas said:
If the GT3 is supposed to be a hardcore, track focused weapon, why shouldn't a faster, more efficient PDK transmission be on the only available option?
Because its ste ! ;p

Its always been seen that a manual, while slower demands more skl from the driver than pdk. As such, people who want the drive to be actually challenging preffer a manual.

I like a manual because its taken a few years to leanr heel&toe and its nice to make a smooth quick shift using skill while still concentrating on your line and the cars ballance, rather than having the shift done for you.

Also I believe that the box on the next gt will be the pdk box but in manual form. Only time will tell if this is a true manual. If they do go pdk they will still sell them, but us oldsters (44 !) will mourn its passing.

Dr JonboyG

2,561 posts

241 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
If it means the RSR gets a PDK gearbox, then the 'purists' don't have a leg to stand on.

DodoRacing

539 posts

209 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Though it makes sense, BMW tried it with the E60 M5 and failed in the US market. In the end it listened to its biggest market's demand and had to bring in the manual back.

I personally like the "PDK only" idea as well since I think it would help with the values of earlier "so called the last manual" cars.

Gary C

12,610 posts

181 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Dr JonboyG said:
If it means the RSR gets a PDK gearbox, then the 'purists' don't have a leg to stand on.
Why?

mattbvw

375 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
I dream (a lot) about owning a GT3. I don't dream about owning an auto one.

Red 3

722 posts

229 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Talking as someone who prefers the analogue over the digital experience I think its a shame to only offer the PDK if this does in fact become the reality. The GT3 concept has however become progressively more techie after the 996 ceased production so it is not really a surprise and as ever I am sure there is a big target market ready and waiting to lap it up. no pun intended.

I wonder what impact this will have on the popularity of the earlier versions of the breed???

bluenote909

3 posts

169 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Personally, I would like to drive the car and a manual is in my opinion the way forward.

George H

14,708 posts

166 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
bluenote909 said:
Personally, I would like to drive the car and a manual is in my opinion the way forward.
Except that from any facts and figures point of view it's a way backwards?

dazren

22,612 posts

263 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
If porsche are trying to achieve stats rather than driver involvement with this new car then they the should drop the GT3 name. The car may end up being a tweaked Carrera S, so why not label it as such.

Carrera SS anyone...... Nope can't see that going down too well.

The Moose

22,906 posts

211 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
veryslowone said:
Would you like to take it the whole hog and get rid of the syncromesh and have to double declutch a lot of the time
I do this most of the time anyway. What's the problem?!

noosh

180 posts

149 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Doubtful I'd ever be in a position to buy one but I just dislike the idea of these things. Maybe I'm old fashioned but it just doesn't seem "organic" (Yes strange adjective use).

I find it odd though why companies produce these cars with these similar gearboxes in the more hardcore models which recently seem to get forgotten about. Yet when they make a bit more of a purist mobile - engine, wheels, seat and manual box - the model generally gets held in sky high esteem and often remembered far more by the enthusiasts.

Panayiotis

503 posts

211 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
I think the 911 has gone soft over the years, particularly when they went watercooled. The 996 GT3 to me was replaced by the 997 GT3RS, and therefore the 997 GT3 IMO was more an expression of what Porsche would want the 911 to be if it wasn't for the needs of precious blondes in Beverly hills.

PDK only for GT3? Why not?

PDK on for GT3RS? No f-ing way!

DMC2

1,837 posts

213 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Oh come on, traction control is just calibration of the ECU and sensors. I very much doubt that the gearbox has anything to do with TC
Wow. You don't know much do you.

graemel

7,053 posts

219 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
GT, GT3 or RS are supposedly more track focused weapons. In a 911 race car there is only one thing better than a manual box and that is a sequential box. A key to help chase a lap time or a tool to do a job. As a fun road car / track day 911 for me part of the whole experience is changing gear. Up shift just before clipping the rev limiter, heel and toe on down shifts. Avoiding 5th to 2nd especially when trail braking into a corner when you have g force miss guiding your hand to a possible 2nd and not 4th. It's all part of honing your skill.
For me the whole 911 experience that got me engaged in the first place was old school. Far from easy to drive fast but that became the whole point of the exercise. For a daily driver and M25 traffic jambs, sure I'd take PDK. For enjoyment and satisfaction I want a manual gearbox.
I thought very long and hard about 3 years ago as to what I wanted from my next 911 to be. Money was not the key issue or investment. I bought a 3.2 Carrera Super Sport that I stripped into a road legal race car. My reasoning. I wanted something that I could have fun in at sensible speed. I adore the turbo body. It has no electronic aids, no abs, power steering, adjustable arb's, non adjustable dampers, no electronic aids other than an ecu that controls the fuel injection. Just man and machine. If I f'it up I can't blame a computer glitch. It's all down to me and that is for me what made the 911 the greatest drivers car of all time.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

251 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
301 said:
How many 911s have you owned
A C2 might be all you need but they're never all you want.

Currently looking for my 5th wink