RE: Chris Harris video: GT2 RS vs Panigale part 2

RE: Chris Harris video: GT2 RS vs Panigale part 2

Author
Discussion

Niffty951

2,334 posts

230 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
I've got to say this does give unfair ammo to the bikes are faster than cars crew. A comment used with similar broad ignorance to any of the comments being disputed here.

I've twice surprised mid range fast bikes in big cars at bigger speeds. It does take a very big bike to maintain the difference from the 80-90 rolling start speed of a sliproad for example. I've even stopped to chat to a 2006 r1 rider afterwards who was very impressed by an at the time already 10 year old Cerbera.

burwoodman

18,709 posts

248 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Top gear tested the atom v8 against the bmw1000. Bike comfortably quicker on straights and off the line. Lost in corners

velocgee

512 posts

148 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Dan gate master said:
Velogee a Porsche gt2 is not exactly a veyron is it!

Put the Porsche up against a s1000rr or any delimited jap 4 cylinder hyper bike and it will get beaten on that runway, why are you surprised at bike being so quick? They weigh nothing (circa180kg) and make between 170 and 210hp these days .
not that the bike was quick in acceleration (that's a given) but that at high speeds (140+) it continued pulling....clearly they now produce enough power to punch holes through the thick air.


sw1000xg

63 posts

151 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Why don't they change the name to Porsche Heads?

Niffty951

2,334 posts

230 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
sw1000xg said:
Why don't they change the name to Porsche Heads?
Same thing isn't it?

RGILL

42 posts

248 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Another video I'd like to add, 300bhp Busa -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxTAbxIAMU4&fea...

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

284 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Never mind the bike, I'd like to race this against Harris' Porsche, cost a fraction of the price and you're more likely to be let out at junctions*. Fancy it, Chris ? Loser buys the bacon butties ? smile
*The road-legal version, this one's a bit not-road-legal.
Outcome of that would be that you probably will be showing the Porsche your heels until the aerodynamics/hp start to work at which point he'll catch up (just like with the bike). Seen it more than once when I had my Honda Elise.

dean100yz

4,330 posts

186 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Erm think this has already been mentioned a few times but the bikes have been restricted to 300km/h or 184.62mph for a few years now

Im not saying the Ducati would pull much more but if its flat out stuff your testing it does cap this bike in this test

To have the governer bypassed is a £20 job

Im a petrol head for bikes & cars so dont care what wins what...Im just saying...

razzle99

165 posts

245 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
I know there are faster top end bikes out there, but the Panigale is just beautiful, and looks utterly ballistic accelerating down that runway. Want one !!! I'm neither anti-car or anti-bike, just pro anything fast ! This from former Ducati owner & current Porsche owner (not GT2 RS unfortunately !), so have a foot in both camps !

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
dean100yz said:
Erm think this has already been mentioned a few times but the bikes have been restricted to 300km/h or 184.62mph for a few years now
This doesn't apply to all bikes, and although I did believe the Panigale to be restricted, I've not found any evidence to support it. Japanese manufacturers have a gentleman's agreement to limit their bikes to 300kph, but MV didn't bother with that when they released the F4 1000 R 312 (312 referring to the average top speed in kph over a recorded run at Bonneville Salt Flats).

You'd think the Panigale is restricted, especially as it claims an extra 12bhp over the F4 and 7kg less ('claims' being the operative word there).

Brummmie

5,284 posts

223 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Been out "repping" in my TVR today in Worcestershire, a nice heater and a stereo, much nicer than my GSXR in these temps, and here it is doing a 10.7 qtr, as quick as most Superbikes?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhdBrEE-7FA&fea...

moparmick

690 posts

235 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Not bad, is that on the motor, nitrous, turbo, supercharger ?
Mick

moparmick

690 posts

235 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Axe Murderer said:
moparmick said:
I go to the drags a fair bit and to be honest, production cars, cannot get near superbikes over the 1/4 mile.

Mick
How about this then?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL8mpGhosxY
That model production car, would be lucky to run a 13 in standard trim.
The car in my sig goes 10.1 on the motor. from the factory, it would probably have run low 13's on road tyres.
Most bikes i see at the strip, dont 60 ft very well, which knocks their et down a little but their terminal speeds are always good.
I'm not trying to start a pissing contest, i was a big biker for years and have a general interest in most performance vehicles. I choose old american iron because i've always liked muscle cars, preferably mopars.
Mick

996 sps

6,165 posts

218 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
Not very surprised the bike won in a straight line, but as soon as you add some corners the car cuts down the gap nicely, and you see this all the time on tracks like the Ring, That bike must be putting out 800, 900Bhp Per Ton.
I'm quicker through the twisties on my bike than either my old M3 or M5, you need to really have an understanding of how quick some people are on bikes.



Brummmie

5,284 posts

223 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
moparmick said:
Not bad, is that on the motor, nitrous, turbo, supercharger ?
Mick
Its just 6.9ltrs smile

ellis427

1,653 posts

181 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
HOLY fkING ROCKING HORSE st

just found this clip...

650 RWHP suzuki hyabusa streetbike!

278.6 mph in seconds.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BT2JjzHa-c&fe...

i'm actually speechless

moparmick

690 posts

235 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Brummmie said:
moparmick said:
Not bad, is that on the motor, nitrous, turbo, supercharger ?
Mick
Its just 6.9ltrs smile
I didn't think they did an LS3 that big. Is it stroked ?
Mick

Brummmie

5,284 posts

223 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
moparmick said:
Brummmie said:
moparmick said:
Not bad, is that on the motor, nitrous, turbo, supercharger ?
Mick
Its just 6.9ltrs smile
I didn't think they did an LS3 that big. Is it stroked ?
Mick
Bored and stroked, and on kinsler ITB's

LordFlathead

9,642 posts

260 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
GingerNinja said:
I'd have thought the new ZZR1400 would have been a better bike for this test - throw a couple of hundred quid at it to remove the speed limiter, and you've got 200mph for under 12K - faster and cheaper than the Ducati.
^^This although I might be slightly biased wink

996 sps

6,165 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
Niffty951 said:
I've got to say this does give unfair ammo to the bikes are faster than cars crew. A comment used with similar broad ignorance to any of the comments being disputed here.

I've twice surprised mid range fast bikes in big cars at bigger speeds. It does take a very big bike to maintain the difference from the 80-90 rolling start speed of a sliproad for example. I've even stopped to chat to a 2006 r1 rider afterwards who was very impressed by an at the time already 10 year old Cerbera.
I'd imagine that R1 rider was a bit ghey and the riders you've met were riding a bit ghey.