Badly modified cars thread Mk2
Discussion
AllyBee said:
Not posted in this thread before but can't think of anywhere better suited for this horror.
http://www.angliacarauctions.co.uk/media/19979/3.j...
xRIEx said:
They don't look that low because it's been exposed according to the meter. The (tiny) scrap of sky is grey, shadows are pretty much non-existent meaning a diffuse light source, meaning cloudy sky. The blurring is only on 'moving' objects (people, plants, boot lids) due to the long exposure, not bokeh, and diffraction is only really a problem at f/32 or smaller (obviously depending on glass quality, zoom/prime, etc.). The fact it's a 800x600 (or whatever) JPG means it's not going to be easily detectable anyway.
Approximate exposure of an object in direct sunlight at f/16 is 1/ISO, and that is definitely not direct sunlight.
If an ND filter was used, it's a pointless endeavour with animated objects in the shot; they'd get better results with a circular polariser and then at least it would remove the skylight reflections from the car bodywork. A graduated ND is great for landscapes or other wildly varying stops of light, a flat ND even when you've really got to get a dreamy long exposure waterfall, but for a static shot? Whack the shutter speed up.
Looks like an ND filter to me, with the large aperture (obvious from DOF) even on a cloudy day you'd have to use an ND filter to get correct exposure at a shutter speed that slow.Approximate exposure of an object in direct sunlight at f/16 is 1/ISO, and that is definitely not direct sunlight.
If an ND filter was used, it's a pointless endeavour with animated objects in the shot; they'd get better results with a circular polariser and then at least it would remove the skylight reflections from the car bodywork. A graduated ND is great for landscapes or other wildly varying stops of light, a flat ND even when you've really got to get a dreamy long exposure waterfall, but for a static shot? Whack the shutter speed up.
There if definitely DOF blur (bokeh if you will) in there, look at he house in the background and the ground in the foreground.
No idea why they would bother; maybe to deliberately blur moving people/etc. in the shot so they detract from the car less?
Edited by Flibble on Sunday 24th May 13:53
AllyBee said:
Not posted in this thread before but can't think of anywhere better suited for this horror.
http://www.angliacarauctions.co.uk/media/19979/3.j...
AstonZagato said:
You should be fined for littering!http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/motorsport/...
The ad said:
A lovely jdl bodykit, a real headturner .
Yes, but for all the wrong reasons!OMG_TURBOZ said:
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/motorsport/...
Not a great choice of colours, but otherwise not too unpleasant.The ad said:
A lovely jdl bodykit, a real headturner .
Yes, but for all the wrong reasons!xRIEx said:
OMG_TURBOZ said:
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/motorsport/...
Not a great choice of colours, but otherwise not too unpleasant.The ad said:
A lovely jdl bodykit, a real headturner .
Yes, but for all the wrong reasons!Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff