£490 road tax, does it put you off?
Discussion
GetCarter said:
Buggerlugz said:
So buying a car and swallowing 16 grand deprecitiation in 4 years is ok ?
Let me let you into a little secret, 4 years later its still the same car, saying its ok to pay heavy rfl when your also taking on £4k a year depreciation is ok but when the price has bottomed out and your covering arond £500 a year depreciation is f
king ludicrous.
Give your head a shake
This really depends on how much money you earn. Can you imagine Luis Suárez going out and buying a second hand car? Just because you don't do it, doesn't mean that others shouldn't... and btw, that four year old car you buy. Someone else had to buy it first!Let me let you into a little secret, 4 years later its still the same car, saying its ok to pay heavy rfl when your also taking on £4k a year depreciation is ok but when the price has bottomed out and your covering arond £500 a year depreciation is f

Give your head a shake

HTH

As long as someone is rich enough or silly enough to fork out the original cost and foot the bill for the depreciation, all you have to worry about is the VED.
Buggerlugz said:
So buying a car and swallowing 16 grand deprecitiation in 4 years is ok ?
Let me let you into a little secret, 4 years later its still the same car, saying its ok to pay heavy rfl when your also taking on £4k a year depreciation is ok but when the price has bottomed out and your covering arond £500 a year depreciation is f
king ludicrous.
Give your head a shake
New cars are still better than a 3 year old car that has been used by another bloke for 3 years. You could buy second hand clothes but you probably dont. If you can afford it why not.Let me let you into a little secret, 4 years later its still the same car, saying its ok to pay heavy rfl when your also taking on £4k a year depreciation is ok but when the price has bottomed out and your covering arond £500 a year depreciation is f

Give your head a shake

When I was looking to buy my R32, I did initially look only at the early 55/06 plate ones in the lower tax bracket. I ended up with a 2007 higher bracket car. (Buying on condition and I got it for what I feel was a fair price)
So, initially yes it did put me off, but when I really thought about it, paying £200 more for tax over an earlier model really is the least of your worries. If you are worrying about it then in all honesty you probably need to be looking at more economical cars.
I don't like throwing money away as much as the next man and giving £475 to the government for the pleasure of owning a car I like (and to drive it on our patchwork roads) is a bit of a kick in the plums, but in the grand scheme of things it doesn't really figure all that highly.
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
So, initially yes it did put me off, but when I really thought about it, paying £200 more for tax over an earlier model really is the least of your worries. If you are worrying about it then in all honesty you probably need to be looking at more economical cars.
I don't like throwing money away as much as the next man and giving £475 to the government for the pleasure of owning a car I like (and to drive it on our patchwork roads) is a bit of a kick in the plums, but in the grand scheme of things it doesn't really figure all that highly.
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
Panda P said:
Personally I think the performance of the car needs to reflect the price.
Golf R32? No
350Z? No
I actually got rid of my old 335i pre-Efficient Dynamics because again, I didn't feel it was enough of a car to justify the tax however, the M3 is fully justified.
Golf R32? No
350Z? No
I actually got rid of my old 335i pre-Efficient Dynamics because again, I didn't feel it was enough of a car to justify the tax however, the M3 is fully justified.

clubsport78 said:
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
That's normally my cue to ask what it's lost per year 
B'stard Child said:
clubsport78 said:
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
That's normally my cue to ask what it's lost per year 
RobM77 said:
B'stard Child said:
clubsport78 said:
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
That's normally my cue to ask what it's lost per year 
clubsport78 said:
RobM77 said:
B'stard Child said:
clubsport78 said:
It's almost worth doing for the look of horror people give you when they realise how much you pay. This is usually followed by them then smugly telling you that their super eco bluegreenefficiencymotion only costs £30 a year :/
That's normally my cue to ask what it's lost per year 

Oh, and with reference to your 'faster' comment, of course it's not all about speed. Almost all of us could have bought faster cars for the money, but that's as relevant as saying an audiophile could have bought a louder hi-fi

Buggerlugz said:
jonah35 said:
New cars are still better than a 3 year old car that has been used by another bloke for 3 years. You could buy second hand clothes but you probably dont. If you can afford it why not.
second hand clothes arent taxed tho so your point is redundantGassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff