Mk1 Focus RS vs EP3

Author
Discussion

wackojacko

8,581 posts

192 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Blimey good going on insurance, Admiral said there's no way to insure me on an M car or anything jap and turbo until 21.

SuperVM

1,098 posts

163 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Focus RS for me, it is the rarer car and will hold its value better. I actually really like both of them and don't think either is a bad choice.

Nick_Johnson

336 posts

179 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
How will the Ford fight back? I know some were reputed to be a right dog to drive on some roads (and rumours abound that some of the front LSD's were set up incorrectly on some of the cars leaving the factory). Aside from the RS's oft-described tendency to tight the cornering line under throttle as opposed to widening out, how will it fight back? I would have thought the Civic would have been the more tenacious car on the road, saying as keeping the front wheels gripping is left to the driver, and the driver is tasked with keeping the engine in the high reaches of the rev range, rather than just relying on a bootful of torque for the turbo?

Not picking fault here, just genuinely interested as I love both cars and I find them fascinating. I could probably even just live with the interior in the Focus. Just.
By fighting back I mean through the steering wheel, you do have to be careful in the lower gears that both hands are on the steering wheel when boost arrives or it can have tenancy to rip your hand off the wheel. The only reason you wouldn't ever have both hands on the wheel is when changing gear but it does happen.

I suppose what I am saying is that you need to be a little more aware when pressing on in the Focus but because of this it is more rewarding, the torque also suits B Road driving which is something the Honda lacks however on track the Type-R really comes alive.

Both wonderful cars,

s m

23,334 posts

205 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
(and rumours abound that some of the front LSD's were set up incorrectly on some of the cars leaving the factory)
That was something Neil Briggs alluded to although he didn't say whether it was a different oil spec or washers etc..

I asked Max Torque about it but don't think he said much about it although he did mention tyre issues etc which was interesting

joe_90

4,206 posts

233 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Try a megane sport too, one with LSD.

Bear Phils

891 posts

138 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
What about the next gen Focus ST?

Better noise from the 5 cylinder, faster, cheaper, less dodgy looking interior

Alias218

1,501 posts

164 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Depends on your driving preferences. I looked at an EP3 and Leon Cupra R (similar comparison to the RS Focus) and went for the Leon due to its low down grunt. The Civic had to be driven too hard all the time for my liking.

Using this as a basis I'd go for a Focus, but it's down to how you like to drive.

On a personal note, my brother had a 270bhp one and it bloody went like the clappers!

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Nick_Johnson said:
Marry all of the above with the fact that a decent low milage Type-R Premier will cost you on avarage £3,000 less than a equivalent MK1 Focus RS must mean that the Honda has this in the bag? Right!

Errm No! For all of its flaws the RS is a much better handling car thanks to its propper Hydraulic Power Steering which inspires so much convenience and provides an unrivalled amount of feel through the steering wheel, something of which Honda can only dream of. Then there is the torque baising differential which helps tuck the nose of the RS into every corner, once it has done this it then allows the driver to exploit all available power much earlier with out spinning it all away which is what happens in the EP3.
For way under 3k you could fit the hydraulic DC5 rack (coupled with an electric PAS pump) and fit an ATB diff to the Civic to fix these two issues (which do spoil an otherwise great car).

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Alias218 said:
The Civic had to be driven too hard all the time for my liking.
That's odd, I do over 300 miles a week in mine, and don't find I have to drive it hard all the time? It's not the most relaxed car for motorway cruising, but that encourages you to keep the speed down and get some pretty good mpg numbers (a lot better than the Focus I suspect). It has a very useful amount of torque at low RPM for city driving, you can accelerate quite rapidly by short shifting.

Ordinary_Chap

7,520 posts

245 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Alias218 said:
The Civic had to be driven too hard all the time for my liking.
That's odd, I do over 300 miles a week in mine, and don't find I have to drive it hard all the time? It's not the most relaxed car for motorway cruising, but that encourages you to keep the speed down and get some pretty good mpg numbers (a lot better than the Focus I suspect). It has a very useful amount of torque at low RPM for city driving, you can accelerate quite rapidly by short shifting.
I owned one for 3 years. You absolutely as said above don't need to drive it hard unless you're trying to make serious progress.

Changing gear at low revs mean you're still far faster than most cars on the road.

vixen1700

23,304 posts

272 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Agree with the two commnets above, use mine for about 250 miles a week and it can be driven like a shopping trolley (usually how my missus drives it), a hot hatch or a bonkers mental thing. hehe

Wouldn't want to drive it for a nose to tail London commute, but for my 20 mile drive to work, it's superb. smile

As for the 'chav' comment on the first page, grow up. rolleyes

gez c16b

182 posts

175 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Im going to put it out there.

Clio 197 FF with Cup Pack and Recaros.

They're priced around in between the two cars already mentioned.

Mastodon2

13,848 posts

167 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
s m said:
That was something Neil Briggs alluded to although he didn't say whether it was a different oil spec or washers etc..

I asked Max Torque about it but don't think he said much about it although he did mention tyre issues etc which was interesting
I'm sure I saw a Chris Harris vid too where he said that some of them felt great and that some of them just felt utterly rubbish, regardless of which year the car was made. Odd stuff, but I suppose they are probably pretty sensitive to their set up, I cant imagine the lowered ones with aftermarket wheels are any near as good as a standard one (a good standard one, not one of the dodgy ones obviously).

LuS1fer

41,189 posts

247 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
I had an EP3 but me and me chav barrister homies were all well wickid.

otolith

56,785 posts

206 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
currybum said:
My little brother has the newer shape Civic type-R and lives in London, unless you are on the open road having all the performance above 5,000rpm is a little frustrating, and you feel like a complete berk screaming around in town.
If you are using the equivalent performance a Civic Type-R has above 5000rpm round town, you are being a berk whether you are getting it from torque or revs.

LuS1fer

41,189 posts

247 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
Why would anyone ever be "screaming around town?". I worry about driving standards more than methods of engine aspiration.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
currybum said:
My little brother has the newer shape Civic type-R and lives in London, unless you are on the open road having all the performance above 5,000rpm is a little frustrating, and you feel like a complete berk screaming around in town.
You certainly would feel a berk screaming it around town, and rightly so because there is absolutely no reason you need to do this. As other people have said, the performance at lower RPM is more than adequate for normal driving.

vixen1700

23,304 posts

272 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
currybum said:
My little brother has the newer shape Civic type-R and lives in London, unless you are on the open road having all the performance above 5,000rpm is a little frustrating, and you feel like a complete berk screaming around in town.
Eh? confused

What's frustrating, it's not like they're slow or anything.

SuperchargedVR6

3,138 posts

222 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
s m said:
Baryonyx said:
(and rumours abound that some of the front LSD's were set up incorrectly on some of the cars leaving the factory)
That was something Neil Briggs alluded to although he didn't say whether it was a different oil spec or washers etc..

I asked Max Torque about it but don't think he said much about it although he did mention tyre issues etc which was interesting
Isn't it just a Quaife ATB? There is nothing to 'set up' in those that I can see. It's all done by gears. Plated diffs I can see needing set up, but you'd be bonkers to use one in a FWD road car imo. I fitted a Quaife to my Corrado VR6 Turbo and it then exhibited exactly the same kind of lane swapping torque steer antics as the Focus.

I would take the EP3 over the Focus personally. To me the Civic feels more of an integrated package designed to be so from the get go. The Focus, to me, feels exactly like what it is, a modified car.

Edited by SuperchargedVR6 on Friday 7th December 12:02

Sir_Dave

1,495 posts

212 months

Friday 7th December 2012
quotequote all
The steering on the EP3 CTR reminds me of a Logitech PS2 controller with the force feedback turned off. For that reason, i would buy something else.

As the only option in the OP's original post is the FRS, i would go for that. Havent driven one, but the CTR is pap imho. How can you lean on a car when you have no idea which way the front wheels are facing?

Steering feedback > Vtec yo.