RE: TVR's new owner: PH Meets

RE: TVR's new owner: PH Meets

Author
Discussion

B17NNS

18,506 posts

248 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Christ, who proof read that?

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
OlberJ said:
Jimmy No Hands said:
Where do I apply for a job? smile
My thoughts exactly!
Same here. smile

Digger

14,718 posts

192 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
Christ, who proof read that?
For once, I don't care! biggrin

steves106

387 posts

160 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Great article.. Something to look forward to on the TVR front by the sounds of it.

Barry Sheene

1,524 posts

284 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Good news, sounds like the right man for the job.

Wish him and his team the best of luck.

Looking forward to finding out what's in store.....





WolfyJones

945 posts

133 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Thank you for bringing it back home, now we just need a Tvr winning at le mans in GT, a new Tvr race series, and I need a Tvr that will murder a 458 on track.

All with a Tvr engine smile

Good luck.

XTR2Turbo

1,533 posts

232 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
GALLARDOGUY said:
TVR is known for its slightly suspect styling???

Hardly!
Certainly not conventional

veevee

1,455 posts

152 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Incredible that it's gone to someone who actually knows what they're talking about, and actually likes cars. Will be very interesting to see what they come up with.

Digger

14,718 posts

192 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Not that it's really relevant in the grand scheme but he does infer as though they have managed to retain the original schematics or even the jigs &/or moulds?!

toast boy

1,242 posts

227 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Not going to be getting my hopes up too much just yet but it seems like he's got the right idea. Seems pretty pragmatic, and staying away from making bold statements and unfulfillable promises. I wish him luck!

Housey

2,076 posts

228 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
It will be interesting to see how this develops over the coming weeks and months and I wish the new owners the best of British luck, I think they will need that together with support and a clear vision. Jaguar have re-invented themselves and now has a superb range of cars and it would be nice, though of course on a much smaller and less cash rich scale to see TVR start to re-emerge but for the long term with quality products.

I think a new design with all the old genes but with a clear focus on quality would be the right step. A rebuilt former car with a new engine is to me not a move forward.

fatbutt

2,663 posts

265 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Bravo! Very good opening statement. He's talking to the fans and new outlets alike. He's showing that he has paid attention (note the comment on the 40+ pages discussion). And, he's level headed about it all.

Good business sense and good handling of the public. Excellent building blocks. Now there needs to be a bit of quiet time while they go beaver away at some designs.

Charlie Michael

2,750 posts

185 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Now that's a man i'd like to do business with.

Sod the touchy feely don't-want-to-upset-anyone-by-saying-the-wrong-thing crap that most car makers spout out. Straight to the point, no gumpf. I can't imagine many power point presentations will take place at TVR now.

Let's knuckle down and crack out a TVR for the future.

I can't wait to see how this develops.

thumbup

forzaminardi

2,293 posts

188 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
A good first impression there - he appears straightforward, confident but modest and acknowledges that he'll be judged on what he does, not on what he says.

DonkeyApple

55,762 posts

170 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Sounds (from that piece) like an arrogant w@nker. A rich one, obviously, but one nevertheless.

Still, wait and see.
Would you rather the company in the hands of something like Ed Milliband? wink

I thought he sounded like a bloke making a very clear initial statement that he wasn't interested in the fancying about of a bunch of old women the last few years and was going to take it forward how he felt best not the old lot.

He seemed to allude to styling being important as well as Englishness as far as any cars are concerned and not nostalgic so certainly have the impression of wanting a modern interpretation that appeals to people today rather than yesterday.

I guess we just have to wait to learn which of those camps we all fall into and whether we are mortally offended, depressed but supportive or over the moon. biggrin

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Would you rather the company in the hands of something like Ed Milliband? wink
Where the fk did you pick that random thing from?

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
forzaminardi said:
A good first impression there - he appears straightforward, confident but modest and acknowledges that he'll be judged on what he does, not on what he says.
Judgement 1 - company established with about £1M - not enough to design/patent and type-approve a new type of headlight wink

JonRB

74,849 posts

273 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
toast boy said:
Not going to be getting my hopes up too much just yet but it seems like he's got the right idea. Seems pretty pragmatic, and staying away from making bold statements and unfulfillable promises. I wish him luck!
Indeed. Came across very well I thought. yes

Certainly a world away from the bombastic "pie in the sky" declarations Smolensky made when he took the helm.

unrepentant

21,292 posts

257 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Have you owned TVRs in the past?
“Yes.”

Which cars?
“That I’m not going to reveal. We are very conscious of that fact that anything that we say before we’re ready to say it could easily be misconstrued.

rofl


What a load of bks! The bullst continues......

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
Whilst i wish them the best of luck (and best of British) with re-inventing TVR, i simply can't see how in 2013, a small company with limited investment can even start to make a "real world" car that compete's with the big players? I wish i could, but i can't. There are two markets that work in that category:

1) Ultra performance, ultra basic (the Caterham / Atom market.) Make it go like stink, don't fit anything that doens't make it go fast. Costs less than £40k

2) The "Unique Hypercar" market: The 'egg, Noble M600 etc. You can afford a bit more tech in the car, but you're only going to sell a handful, and they cost lots (>£200k). Effectively brought by customers "just to be different" from the Lambo/Ferrari owners (they'll have a couple of those in their collection already)

Unfortunately, between those extremes lies a very difficult, and crowded, market place. The mainstream cars are now so fast that to be significantly "faster" is actually really hard, so you don't have that pure speed USP anymore. And the mainstream cars come with such a wide capability base (ABS/DSC/NAV/A/C/warranty/resale etc) that you can't compete with those either.

So, in summary, Tricky, very Tricky ;-)