RE: Driven: Porsche Cayenne Turbo

RE: Driven: Porsche Cayenne Turbo

Author
Discussion

James Junior 14

47 posts

186 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
I have a long standing hatred of these Chelsea tractors, but I cannot help but really like that.

It looks well proportioned, the styling really cleans up the bloated mess of the original and the engines are becoming greener and more efficient with the kerb weight seeing a significant reduction.

Porsche - I salute you! There is hope for the survival of the performance sector yet!

AC Motors

397 posts

210 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Still pig ugly IMO, Range Rover every time.

djt100

1,735 posts

187 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Still looks like a fish sucking an egg...

alanjpearson

5 posts

168 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
All I can say is YEUCH!
It is still an overpriced ugly brute - just like the Range Rover.
Who wants to drive a bog-eyed bus-shaped truck? Not me.

I love my Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8.
It outperforms this thing in all areas and is about £30K cheaper.
Not only that but my LPG conversion means I get 34MPG equivalent and less than 5.0 seconds to 60MPH performance.
And it's a lot prettier to look at than the Cayenne - which isn't so spicy!

R
Alan

Carl_Docklands

12,355 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all

Thanks for the review, the drive on these new models has recieved mixed press reviews. Having sat in one of these I had the following comments:

1. The price fully specced for all Cayenne models is now beyond a joke, I don't know why PH bother to list the non-specced prices
2. In the flesh it is better looking than a Range Rover, dependent on colour. It makes the RR look like a giant carboard box. The dark purple is very nice.
3. The interior is now the best in the business
4. The expected depcreciation on a finance deal is slightly higher than last time
5. Unless i was truly loaded and had £120k to blow on a fully specced Cayenne Turbo then I would go for the new Toureg.

Lovely piece of kit but you'll be mugged by the options list more than on the Sports cars!

SAGPACK

357 posts

192 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
louismchuge said:
that fuel consumption stat is pretty impressive
Agreed. But what happens in the real world?
I'll let you know in a few days...I pick mine up on Saturday morning!!!!getmecoat

Garlick

40,601 posts

242 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Carl_Docklands said:
Thanks for the review, the drive on these new models has recieved mixed press reviews. Having sat in one of these I had the following comments:

1. The price fully specced for all Cayenne models is now beyond a joke, I don't know why PH bother to list the non-specced prices
2. In the flesh it is better looking than a Range Rover, dependent on colour. It makes the RR look like a giant carboard box. The dark purple is very nice.
3. The interior is now the best in the business
4. The expected depcreciation on a finance deal is slightly higher than last time
5. Unless i was truly loaded and had £120k to blow on a fully specced Cayenne Turbo then I would go for the new Toureg.

Lovely piece of kit but you'll be mugged by the options list more than on the Sports cars!
Good sensible post, interesting comment about the Touareg too.

ManOpener

12,467 posts

171 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
alanjpearson said:
I love my Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8.
It outperforms this thing in all areas and is about £30K cheaper.
Does it? I see where you coming from off-road but I bet this is far faster on it...

David87

6,676 posts

214 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
To my eyes that is a vast improvement over the outgoing model. Would make a fantastic everyday car!

m3sye

26,231 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
got to say i like it...

edo

16,699 posts

267 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
alanjpearson said:
All I can say is YEUCH!
It is still an overpriced ugly brute - just like the Range Rover.
Who wants to drive a bog-eyed bus-shaped truck? Not me.

I love my Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8.
It outperforms this thing in all areas and is about £30K cheaper.
Not only that but my LPG conversion means I get 34MPG equivalent and less than 5.0 seconds to 60MPH performance.
And it's a lot prettier to look at than the Cayenne - which isn't so spicy!

R
Alan
Cant agree with a lot of that - yup, the Jeep is cheaper - but it certainly feels it inside, and I'm not convinced it could outpace the Turbo on the road or track...

Andy T

468 posts

230 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
As my 2 year old daughter would say "YUK!"

Mars

8,781 posts

216 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
That would be my lottery-win everyday car. Love it..!!

edinph

386 posts

176 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Andy T said:
As my 2 year old daughter would say "YUK!"
She's right! Still ugly and pointless!

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

208 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
louismchuge said:
that fuel consumption stat is pretty impressive
That fuel consumption stat is wildly and laughably optimistic. I mean seriously. Twin turbo V8 with 500bhp dragging two tonnes around and doing 24mpg +.

Jimmy Hill Chinny reckon scratchchin

G_T

16,160 posts

192 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
louismchuge said:
that fuel consumption stat is pretty impressive
That fuel consumption stat is wildly and laughably optimistic. I mean seriously. Twin turbo V8 with 500bhp dragging two tonnes around and doing 24mpg +.

Jimmy Hill Chinny reckon scratchchin
Maybe they started measuring at the top of the hill....

I'd be immensely impressed if it was true though.

The diesel spec is pretty impressive as well!

dxbtiger

4,400 posts

175 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
ManOpener said:
alanjpearson said:
I love my Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8.
It outperforms this thing in all areas and is about £30K cheaper.
Does it? I see where you coming from off-road but I bet this is far faster on it...
The SRT-8 Jeep is seriously rapid, even the stockers embarrass me when I try to play with them

shantybeater

1,195 posts

171 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Absolutely hideous and pointless...even more than the last one

louiebaby

10,651 posts

193 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Carl_Docklands said:
Thanks for the review, the drive on these new models has recieved mixed press reviews. Having sat in one of these I had the following comments:

1. The price fully specced for all Cayenne models is now beyond a joke, I don't know why PH bother to list the non-specced prices
2. In the flesh it is better looking than a Range Rover, dependent on colour. It makes the RR look like a giant carboard box. The dark purple is very nice.
3. The interior is now the best in the business
4. The expected depcreciation on a finance deal is slightly higher than last time
5. Unless i was truly loaded and had £120k to blow on a fully specced Cayenne Turbo then I would go for the new Toureg.

Lovely piece of kit but you'll be mugged by the options list more than on the Sports cars!
Good sensible post, interesting comment about the Touareg too.
I think it's been a few years since the Touareg has been available with the V10 TDi, (feel free to correct me.)

If Volkswagen do one with some kind of meaty diesel, it would be difficult to justify a Cayenne Turbo over the top of the Touareg.

In (slightly) the same way it is difficult to justify the supercharged petrol RR over the TDV8 model.

I just wish I was in the position to HAVE to make those kind of decisions...

alexpa

644 posts

174 months

Thursday 10th June 2010
quotequote all
Looks much better. The previous model's rear is disgusting.

Still don't like it though