Petrol prices..........would you now consider a motorbike?

Petrol prices..........would you now consider a motorbike?

Author
Discussion

thewildblue

351 posts

175 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Ive got an 08 ZX10R that with a pillon and luggage will return 47mpg cruising at an indicated 95....or thats what I managed on my way up the A1 to an airfield day. Filled up at home, straight onto the A1, then filled up right near RAF Wittering.

I would sometimes do a 65mile each way commute and not hang about and mid 40s was very easy to achieve.

If you start to have a play with the throttle a little and a few(say 20-30 in a tank) 130+ moments then it will return very high 30s low 40s out of a tank.

If you go batst crazy then the lowest Ive seen is 26mpg and that was maxxing it out all the time on an airfield day, that includes an indicated 189 in 5th down the main straight everytime.

This is all from a bike that will do the quarter in 10sec and crack a ton in under 6.

goldblum

10,272 posts

169 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
My Aprilia Tuono averages at least double the mpg of my car at about 28 mpg.

As for the S8...

NHK244V

3,358 posts

174 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Hmmm would i increase my chances of dying to save money ?
err no laugh


EDLT

15,421 posts

208 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
No. Bikes that are worth owning just aren't efficient enough, and I'd still need a car anyway so anything I save on fuel would be spent on the running costs of a bike (and then some).

twazzock

1,930 posts

171 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Yes, have done. I will probably own my first motorbike before my first car (yes, priced out before I've even begun!)

supersingle

3,205 posts

221 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
No. Bikes that are worth owning just aren't efficient enough, and I'd still need a car anyway so anything I save on fuel would be spent on the running costs of a bike (and then some).
Bikes don't have to be expensive and fast to be fun. I've had some fun and memorable rides on the back of a Honda Cub. wink

Same goes for cars.

terzo

122 posts

162 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
y2blade said:
my DRZ400S was doing 65ish mpg commuting

100miles per £5
confused At 65mpg it's costing somewhere in the region of £5.68 to cover 65 miles (assuming £1.25/litre)

Mastodon2

13,835 posts

167 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I think it would be good fun to ride and own a bike, but the thousands of pounds it would cost to get my licence, get my leathers, boots, gloves, helmet, buy a bike and then tax and insure it would end up being more expense than running a Lancer Evolution for me. I don't think a bike could ever replace cars for me in terms of thrills, cars are where my passion lies, but at that kind of price I just don't consider it anymore.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

200 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Did Das is September, getting bike when weather improves, mid Feb probably to commute on. At bit if a loss of what to get though, only riden 2 bikes, a cb-1 400-4 which I loved and a Gs500 which I hated. Annoyingly all the bikes I have sat in shops the most comfortable one that just seemed right was an sv650 which will display the feature I hated in the gs500 - loads of engine braking. Street triple also seems comfortable and apparently is more like a straight 4 so I should like it. Trouble is they hold value so well I may as well buy new and I didn't really want to spend that much.

twazzock

1,930 posts

171 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
terzo said:
y2blade said:
my DRZ400S was doing 65ish mpg commuting

100miles per £5
confused At 65mpg it's costing somewhere in the region of £5.68 to cover 65 miles (assuming £1.25/litre)
Key word emboldened.

He's referring to back in the day when petrol was 75p/L, according to my spreadsheet.

Mastodon2

13,835 posts

167 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Did Das is September, getting bike when weather improves, mid Feb probably to commute on. At bit if a loss of what to get though, only riden 2 bikes, a cb-1 400-4 which I loved and a Gs500 which I hated. Annoyingly all the bikes I have sat in shops the most comfortable one that just seemed right was an sv650 which will display the feature I hated in the gs500 - loads of engine braking. Street triple also seems comfortable and apparently is more like a straight 4 so I should like it. Trouble is they hold value so well I may as well buy new and I didn't really want to spend that much.
Having sat on many bikes, the two I found most comfortable were the 2010 Fireblade (unsuitable for beginners to say the least) and the Kawasaki ZZR1400, which is like the grim reaper in bike form for noobs! The ZZR is a big bike and I found myself able to stretch out and get comfy on it pretty easily. It's also warp-speed fast and not really a "starter" bike!

# Lord Lucan #

234 posts

193 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I would love a bike but i think there are way to many numpties not looking at junctions and roundabouts and as such think it best to stick with a tin box

*Al*

Original Poster:

3,830 posts

224 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I passed my test first time, i done the DAS course and then bought a CBR600 F Sport which was a sportsbike (not supersports). Fantastic first bike which basically out performed most cars on the road.Test cost me in the region of £500-600 full training inc loan bike and test?CBT. Leathers and decent gear can be bought at a reasonable cost via ebay etc, so not too bad.I can honestly garantee once you pass you'll love it!
Remember it's not all about speeding, handling and acceleration can happen at legal speeds too.

pits

6,429 posts

192 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
David87 said:
Not a chance. The money it'd cost to get through the test and buy the gear and bike would buy an awful lot of fuel. I can't fall off my car either.biggrin
This.
Whilst I do have a bike, the gear, test and bike will put you close to £2000, now to put that in perspective, that is around 11,000 miles in a car that averages around 20-25mpg.

Weigh up whether you do more than 11,000 miles a year in a car that does around 25mpg, if that is bang on the money then it will cost you, but if your car is doing like 16mpg then selling the car and getting a bike would be an option.

Scraggles

7,619 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
used to have a bike, vividly recall the time when my waterproofs failed to be waterproof and there was this slow trickle of cold water down my bum crack and into my pants, soaking the bum and balls

then there was a time I almost went under a truck's wheels, that was so much fun frown

or maybe the lack of ability to carry much more than a backbox to hold the helmet in, so no camping

now I have a car, so I can't fall over, get soaked in heavy rain, got a nice air con for when it is really hot and when I go camping, can fill the car upto the ceiling

DIW35

4,146 posts

202 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
Been there, done that, don't envisage going back to it any time soon.

Uhura fighter

7,018 posts

185 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
No, last time it didn't end well....



I now work from home smile


k-ink

9,070 posts

181 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
Maybe a bike would make a fun extra toy. But there's no way I'd give up heated leather, silence, comfort, load lugging, safety for an additional tiny mpg advantage! Buy a bike if that's your thing, but those mpg seem pretty poor for all the sacrafices. I'd assumed bikes would be 100 mpg or something.

Beartato

634 posts

170 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
If you've never ridden a bike before I would advocate doing the CBT then going for the licence. That way you'll know if you even like riding or not before outlaying a fiendish amount of cash.

However, all right thinking people will love it and riding a bike gives you something most cars just can't deliver. Fuel economy doesn't matter. A lot of cars deliver better fuel economy than my bike but would I change it for a bluemotion Polo? Would I fk.

B3njamin

1,129 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
A 125cc bike does make sense - they're cheap to buy, insure, tax and fuel and since most of them don't hit stellar speeds, safety gear can-if you chose to do so-be reduced to save extra cash.

600cc bike costs:

DAS Test=£800 2 years ago
Insurance=£600 so far
MOT's=£70ish
Gear=£700
Current Bike=£1000
Random bits for it= ~£200

At the current mileage I do it's not likely to break even very soon and will take a while to recoup fully. That said, insurance is £100 a year now, tax is £50, chuck in the MOT and it's less than £200 which means it generally does pay for itself in reduced fuel costs if you write off the start up costs. I get about 46mpg when riding the Monster, a lot more than the Mazda manages.

Running a bike as my only vehicle would be a lot cheaper than a car but I'm happy to keep it as a fun toy that doesn't really cost me anything allongside the car - It's a great experience and it always makes me happy when I go out on it. :-)