6 People Hit by 458 Scud This Morning in Battersea

6 People Hit by 458 Scud This Morning in Battersea

Author
Discussion

NorthDave

2,371 posts

233 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
^^^I think this is worthy of it's own thread.

I am used to old cars without any driver aids and the only time I had a play in the snow with a car with aids a bit of fun nearly got out of hand as the programmers clearly didn't expect the driver to react to a slide.

What I expected to be a brief slide (based on a 20+ years experience) became a 50m experience of WTF !!!

Depending upon your position it's / my inputs were unhelpful - with it's sensors, it at least knew what I was doing, I had no idea what it was doing !
I had a similar experience at the Porsche driving experience at Silverstone - with the TC on there was no way I could control the car on the skid pan. Switch it all off and you could do a semi graceful powerslide. Of course you are expecting to slide there so I assume if you arent expecting it the electronics help.

Vaud

50,760 posts

156 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
Can I just say the one in the mazda MX-5 is rubbish. Balance the power around the roundabout and it drops power if it thinks you're pushing it, the applies it again, completely unsettles the car
MK3?

Bradley1500

766 posts

147 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
dme123 said:
Absolutely colossal difference in behaviour between early 90s ESP systems like the one in your Supra and modern state of the art systems like you'd find in a 458 (or a Mondeo). Traction control / stability control systems don't just kill power and leave you to await your death when you try and pull too briskly out of a wet junction any more, thank god.

You can still overcome them of course, but you really do have to be driving like a complete bell end.
Obviously there is a difference between a modern ESP and my Supra’s VSC; the reason I referenced my Supra was in reply to the news story of someone unfortunately killing their girlfriend in one.

I agree that the system in my Supra will be fairly primitive, but I’ve also experienced similar in modern cars: BMW F10 M5, Jaguar XJR and even a BMW 116D! These systems are not infallible, especially when combined with heavy, powerful cars with wide tyres in damp or wet conditions. Once a car like that is sliding the systems are going to have a very hard time of recovering the car without some driver input.

Relating this back to the original post: unfortunately I haven’t driven a Ferrari 458 Speciale, but reading the posts on here it seems you could easily get one very out of shape with all the systems turned on.

jamieduff1981 said:
My personal motive for discussing electronics was as stated a wee bit earlier - that is to say "do not assume that electronics will save you", and depending on the particular car and its particular electronics, you don't need to be driving too aggressively to cross its limits in cold/damp conditions.

My Cerbera has never shocked me like the Jag did, because I'm always very conscious of the fact that the Cerbera offers no assistance at all. I believed (like many here still seem to) until that point that the Jag's electronics would prevent a dramatic rear-end breakaway accelerating fairly modestly in a straight line, and they didn't. Now I drive the Jag like the Cerbera and drive on the basis that the electronics don't help. I just forget they're there. I don't turn them off because I reckon the would prevent a full spin and being switched on doesn't hurt anything, but I have learned not to rely on them.

My concern is that some here still expect their electronics to catch their mistakes. Big engines and fat tyres don't like cold weather. Drivers need to remember that and remember that electronics can't make friction when big fat tyres have let go on cold damp roads.
stewjohnst said:
"Please note that although our engineers are highly skilled, they are not able to alter the laws of physics and therefore you should not rely wholly on the electronic stability programmes as a substitute for...”
These two posts sum it up well. These systems are not perfect, and as such I don’t drive expecting them to catch me when I run out of talent.

BarryGibb

335 posts

148 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Bradley1500 said:
These systems are not infallible, especially when combined with heavy, powerful cars with wide tyres in damp or wet conditions. Once a car like that is sliding the systems are going to have a very hard time of recovering the car without some driver input.
Depends on the particular implementation.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
swerni said:
AH33 said:
"35 year old man, skill level: low, crashes on almost straight road while trying to impress teenagers with his nice red car"
Gets my vote
Equally stupid guess said:
Nice red car swerves onto footpath, avoiding cyclist suddenly crossing road from rear of Sherman tank coming the other way
Guessing game. What's the value in that?

grumpy grandad

20 posts

89 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
mikearwas said:
Yes, its easy to get into trouble if you react before the system does which then kicks in and adds additional correction to what you're already doing. This can result in the car snapping back the other way if you're not careful.
I must admit to having little expeience of "driver aids" as I've always tried to avoid them, even to the extent of fighting with Porsche as they were a factory option which they made part of the UK spec, got my car without them eventually.
In my 43 years of driving i've spun a car once, on purpose, in a car park, just to see what happened, but I have been very sideways on numerous occasions without undue drama.
As I've said before, if people let these devices decide the limits they are in for a nasty shock when the system doesn't know what to do, there are millions of variables in car and it's environment and a limited number of lines of code in a program.
The ultimate responsibility lies with the nut on the steering wheel. I prefer to take that responsiblity myself, not delegate it to some silicon chips.
My daily driver is an Integrale so I don't need much more help :-)

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
I did an Audi day at Silverstone when I got my R8 a few years back.

We had a crash avoidance test with and without aids in a V10. Off was quite a eye opener after trying it with aids on!!!

MWM3

1,765 posts

123 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Guessing game. What's the value in that?
Sod off then you boring tt

grumpy grandad

20 posts

89 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
MWM3 said:
Sod off then you boring tt
It's Mr Boring Old tt to you sonny :-)

H20DJY

189 posts

94 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
grumpy grandad said:
I must admit to having little expeience of "driver aids" as I've always tried to avoid them, even to the extent of fighting with Porsche as they were a factory option which they made part of the UK spec, got my car without them eventually.
In my 43 years of driving i've spun a car once, on purpose, in a car park, just to see what happened, but I have been very sideways on numerous occasions without undue drama.
As I've said before, if people let these devices decide the limits they are in for a nasty shock when the system doesn't know what to do, there are millions of variables in car and it's environment and a limited number of lines of code in a program.
The ultimate responsibility lies with the nut on the steering wheel. I prefer to take that responsiblity myself, not delegate it to some silicon chips.
My daily driver is an Integrale so I don't need much more help :-)
I like how all your posts are basically boasting about you and your cars.

grumpy grandad

20 posts

89 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
H20DJY said:
I like how all your posts are basically boasting about you and your cars.
Why thank you you're too kind.

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
grumpy grandad said:

In my 43 years of driving i've spun a car once, on purpose, in a car park,


grumpy grandad

20 posts

89 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
blade7 said:
How did you get my photo, you one of those hacker types?

boxerTen

501 posts

205 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Bradley1500 said:

Once a car like that is sliding the systems are going to have a very hard time of recovering the car without some driver input.

Relating this back to the original post: unfortunately I haven’t driven a Ferrari 458 Speciale, but reading the posts on here it seems you could easily get one very out of shape with all the systems turned on.
Once the Speciale is cornering hard doing something abrupt with the lock, throttle, or brakes will have it break away. Once its let go however the ESP is almost God-like in collecting the situation, often very quickly. It doesn't however point the front wheels for you. In fact I wonder whether inexperienced drivers in fact drive, rather than slide off the road.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
swerni said:
MWM3 said:
mybrainhurts said:
Guessing game. What's the value in that?
Sod off then you boring old tt
Fixed that for you wink
Well, thank you gentlemen.

Bit of valid criticism of vacuous assumptions and lynch mob mentality hard to swallow, eh?

grumpy grandad

20 posts

89 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
swerni said:
Sorry was it criticism? I thought it was just a vacuous comment.;)
+1

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

254 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
Any news on the casualties?

Borroxs

20,911 posts

248 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
Any news on the casualties?
All the injured people were discharged from hospital on the day, or the day after, so I cant see that there could have been any lasting/severe injuries.

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

254 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
Borroxs said:
AMG Merc said:
Any news on the casualties?
All the injured people were discharged from hospital on the day, or the day after, so I cant see that there could have been any lasting/severe injuries.
That's good news then. Surprised the one who went airborne didn't need a longer hospital stay.

Borroxs

20,911 posts

248 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
Borroxs said:
AMG Merc said:
Any news on the casualties?
All the injured people were discharged from hospital on the day, or the day after, so I cant see that there could have been any lasting/severe injuries.
That's good news then. Surprised the one who went airborne didn't need a longer hospital stay.
Yeah me too. Maybe hitting that car was a lucky break, the ground is usually harder! Sure there was a lot of cuts and bruises though... usually the hospitals release info such as broken bones etc in accidents...